{"entity":{"id":"paper-nct02453282-jama-oncol-2020","kind":"paper","name":"Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab vs Standard Chemotherapy in First-line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The MYSTIC Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial","aka":[],"tldr":"Published report from the MYSTIC trial registered as NCT02453282, in JAMA Oncology (2020), chosen as the most cited paper whose own text cites the registry id.","summary":"Importance: Checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death 1 or its ligand (PD-L1) as monotherapies or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 have shown clinical activity in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.\n\nObjective: To compare durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.\n\nDesign, setting, and participants: This open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial (MYSTIC) was conducted at 203 cancer treatment centers in 17 countries. Patients with treatment-naive, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer who had no sensitizing EGFR or ALK genetic alterations were randomized to receive treatment with durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, or chemotherapy. Data were collected from July 21, 2015, to October 30, 2018.\n\nInterventions: Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive treatment with durvalumab (20 mg/kg every 4 weeks), durvalumab (20 mg/kg every 4 weeks) plus tremelimumab (1 mg/kg every 4 weeks, up to 4 doses), or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.\n\nMain outcomes and measures: The primary end points, assessed in patients with ≥25% of tumor cells expressing PD-L1, were overall survival (OS) for durvalumab vs chemotherapy, and OS and progression-free survival (PFS) for durvalumab plus tremelimumab vs chemotherapy. Analysis of blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) was exploratory.\n\nResults: Between July 21, 2015, and June 8, 2016, 1118 patients were randomized. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were balanced between treatment groups. Among 488 patients with ≥25% of tumor cells expressing PD-L1, median OS was 16.3 months (95% CI, 12.2-20.8) with durvalumab vs 12.9 months (95% CI, 10.5-15.0) with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 97.54% CI, 0.56-1.02; P =.04 [nonsignificant]). Median OS was 11.9 months (95% CI, 9.0-17.7) with durvalumab plus tremelimumab (HR vs chemotherapy, 0.85; 98.77% CI, 0.61-1.17; P =.20). Median PFS was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.8-5.0) with durvalumab plus tremelimumab vs 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.6-5.8) with chemotherapy (HR, 1.05; 99.5% CI, 0.72-1.53; P =.71). Among 809 patients with evaluable bTMB, those with a bTMB ≥20 mutations per megabase showed improved OS for durvalumab plus tremelimumab vs chemotherapy (median OS, 21.9 months [95% CI, 11.4-32.8] vs 10.0 months [95% CI, 8.1-11.7]; HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.32-0.74). Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 55 (14.9%) of 369 patients who received treatment with durvalumab, 85 (22.9%) of 371 patients who received treatment with durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and 119 (33.8%) of 352 patients who received treatment with chemotherapy. These adverse events led to death in 2 (0.5%), 6 (1.6%), and 3 (0.9%) patients, respectively.\n\nConclusions and relevance: The phase 3 MYSTIC study did not meet its primary end points of improved OS with durvalumab vs chemotherapy or improved OS or PFS with durvalumab plus tremelimumab vs chemotherapy in patients with ≥25% of tumor cells expressing PD-L1. Exploratory analyses identified a bTMB threshold of ≥20 mutations per megabase for optimal OS benefit with durvalumab plus tremelimumab.\n\nTrial registration: ClinicalT rials.gov Identifier: NCT02453282.\n\nIndexed on Europe PMC as PubMed record 32271377 (DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0237). Its abstract cites the registry id NCT02453282, which is how it was matched to this trial; no figure has been checked by an editor.","asOf":"2026-09-22","links":[{"label":"JAMA Oncol 2020","url":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0237"},{"label":"PubMed","url":"https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32271377/"},{"label":"Europe PMC","url":"https://europepmc.org/article/MED/32271377"},{"label":"ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02453282","url":"https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02453282"}],"tags":["europepmc-ingest"],"related":[],"cancers":[],"sections":[],"technologies":[],"targets":[],"drugs":[],"companies":[],"institutions":[],"pathways":[],"terms":[],"trials":["nct02453282"],"people":[],"bottlenecks":[],"keyPapers":[],"journals":["jama-oncology"],"dependsOn":[],"notes":[],"journal":"JAMA Oncology","year":2020,"doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0237","pmid":"32271377","authors":"Rizvi NA, Cho BC, Reinmuth N, et al.","paperType":"rct","findings":[],"whatItMeans":"This is the paper Europe PMC returns for registry id NCT02453282 with the most citations, so it is the natural first reading for anyone following the MYSTIC trial. Read the abstract above alongside the trial page and the registry entry; the record was linked automatically and its figures have not been checked by hand.","caveats":["Matched to the trial by the registry id cited in the Europe PMC record; the summary reproduces the record's abstract and no figure has been verified against the full paper."]},"route":"/key-papers/paper-nct02453282-jama-oncol-2020/","neighbours":{"trial":[{"id":"nct02453282","kind":"trial","name":"Phase III Open Label First Line Therapy Study of MEDI 4736 (Durvalumab) With or Without Tremelimumab Versus SOC in Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)","route":"/trials/nct02453282/"}],"journal":[{"id":"jama-oncology","kind":"journal","name":"JAMA Oncology","route":"/journals/jama-oncology/"}]}}