OnCo
ideasIdea

Design drug pairs where resisting one makes you vulnerable to the other

Choose two treatments so that whatever the tumour does to escape the first, it becomes easier to kill with the second. The immune system is a good candidate partner.

An evolutionary double bind pairs therapies with opposing selection pressures. Examples with preclinical support include MAPK inhibition increasing antigen presentation (making escape via MAPK reactivation immune-visible) and antiandrogen resistance via lineage plasticity creating dependence on EZH2. The proposal is to make double-bind logic an explicit design criterion, with a mechanistic screen for pairs in which resistance to A upregulates the target of B.

Hypothesis
Combinations selected for double-bind structure delay resistance in vivo more than combinations selected for additive cytotoxicity, at matched toxicity.
Rationale
Resistance is a phenotype shift; if the shift can be predicted, the second agent can be aimed at the shifted state. This reframes combination discovery from additive killing to evolutionary trap design.
What would test it
Screen resistant derivative panels for upregulated targetable dependencies, validate the top three pairs in immunocompetent models, and take one pair into a phase 1b with mandatory paired biopsies.
Maturity
preclinical evidence
Who has to act
research
Cost to try
Medium ($1M to $50M)
Years to first evidence
5
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

8top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links