OnCo
ideasIdea

Use pre-surgery immunotherapy windows as the field's biomarker engine

Giving immunotherapy for a few weeks before surgery produces a tumour sample that shows exactly what the drug did. That is the fastest way to learn who responds.

Neoadjuvant window trials deliver paired baseline and post-treatment tissue plus a pathological response readout within weeks, and they have already produced high-quality mechanistic insight in melanoma, colorectal cancer with mismatch repair deficiency and bladder cancer. Standardising a shared window protocol across tumour types, with common tissue handling and open data release, would turn scattered studies into a systematic discovery platform.

Hypothesis
A standardised multi-tumour neoadjuvant window platform identifies and validates response biomarkers at least twice as fast as advanced-disease trials, measured by biomarkers reaching prospective validation per year.
Rationale
Pathological response is available in weeks and correlates with long-term outcome in several diseases, so causal inference is far cheaper than in metastatic trials. Neoadjuvant mismatch repair deficient studies produced near-complete response rates and detailed mechanism from small numbers of patients.
What would test it
Launch a shared window protocol at ten centres across three tumour types with common sample processing and mandatory rapid open data release; measure biomarkers nominated and validated per year.
Maturity
being tested at scale
Who has to act
research
Cost to try
Medium ($1M to $50M)
Years to first evidence
4
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

17top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links