OnCo
trialsTrialPositive

EV-303 / KEYNOTE-905

For patients who cannot have cisplatin, the ADC-immunotherapy pair around surgery cut the risk of recurrence or death by 60% and the risk of death by half.

EFS HR 0.40; OS HR 0.50; pCR 57.1% vs 8.6%. Presented ESMO 2025 (NEJM); FDA approval November 2025 for perioperative EV + pembrolizumab in cisplatin-ineligible MIBC. The largest effect size yet seen in a perioperative bladder trial.

Setting
Cisplatin-ineligible MIBC: perioperative enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab with cystectomy vs cystectomy alone
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
Astellas / Pfizer / Merck
Registry
Headline result
EFS HR 0.40; OS HR 0.50; pCR 57.1% vs 8.6%.
Reported
2025
Enrolled
344
Replication
EV-304 (cisplatin-eligible) reported positive EFS, OS, and pCR versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in December 2025, confirming the perioperative EV + pembrolizumab effect in a second population.

Outcomes

3top
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
344 people took part
Event-free survivalprimarysurrogate endpoint
  • The treated group had about 60 percent lower chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 0.4).
  • The absolute difference, how many more people out of 100 were helped, is not reported here.
  • This is a surrogate endpoint: it measures the cancer being controlled or absent on scans and tests, which often, but not always, translates into living longer.
Overall survivalsurvival endpoint
  • The treated group had about 50 percent lower chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 0.5).
  • The absolute difference, how many more people out of 100 were helped, is not reported here.
  • Overall survival counts deaths from any cause, so it is the most direct measure of whether a treatment helps people live longer.
Pathologic complete responsesurrogate endpoint
  • 57.1 vs 8.6 out of 100 had no cancer left at surgery with EV + pembrolizumab compared with Cystectomy alone; 48.5 more per 100.
  • Roughly one extra person helped for every 2 treated. That is a rough figure taken from the two percentages, not a guarantee for any one person.
  • This is a surrogate endpoint: it measures the cancer being controlled or absent on scans and tests, which often, but not always, translates into living longer.
Be careful
  • These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Cisplatin-ineligible MIBC: perioperative enfortumab vedotin + pembrolizumab with cystectomy vs cystectomy alone. People in a different situation may not see the same effect.

Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.

344 participants enrolled.

Event-free survivalprimary
HR 0.4 (0.28–0.56)

Numbers not yet public.

Source
Overall survival
HR 0.5 (0.33–0.74)

Numbers not yet public.

Pathologic complete response
EV + pembrolizumab57.1 of 100
Cystectomy alone8.6 of 100
EndpointArmnValueHR (95% CI)pSource
Event-free survivalprimaryEV + pembrolizumab, perioperative0.4 (0.28–0.56)link
Cystectomy alone
Overall survivalEV + pembrolizumab0.5 (0.33–0.74)
Cystectomy alone
Pathologic complete responseEV + pembrolizumab57.1%
Cystectomy alone8.6%
Replication
EV-304 (cisplatin-eligible) reported positive EFS, OS, and pCR versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in December 2025, confirming the perioperative EV + pembrolizumab effect in a second population.

Connected

8top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links