OnCo
trialsTrialNegative

CheckMate 548 & CheckMate 143 & CheckMate 498

CheckMate 548, 143 and 498 were three large trials, all negative: the immunotherapy that transformed melanoma and lung cancer did nothing in glioblastoma.

CheckMate 143 (recurrent, n=369): OS 9.8 vs 10.0 months with bevacizumab. CheckMate 498 (unmethylated, nivolumab replacing temozolomide): OS 13.4 vs 14.9 months, worse. CheckMate 548 (methylated, nivolumab added): no PFS or OS benefit. Explanations: low mutational burden, T-cell exclusion behind the blood-brain barrier, steroid immunosuppression, systemic lymphopenia. Neoadjuvant PD-1 (Cloughesy 2019) showed immune activation and remains the only encouraging signal.

Setting
Glioblastoma: nivolumab added to standard therapy (newly diagnosed, MGMT-methylated CM548; MGMT-unmethylated vs temozolomide CM498) and nivolumab vs bevacizumab at recurrence (CM143)
Phase
Phase 3
Sponsor
BMS
Registry
Headline result
No OS benefit in any of the three trials.
Reported
2020
Enrolled
716
Replication
Consistent with CheckMate 143 and 498: three negative randomised trials of PD-1 blockade in glioblastoma.

Outcomes

1top
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
716 people took part
Overall survival, MGMT-methylated glioblastomaprimarysurvival endpoint
  • Median 28.9 vs 32.1 months with Nivolumab + RT + temozolomide compared with Placebo + RT + temozolomide; about 3.2 months shorter for half the group.
  • A median is a midpoint: half the people did better than this and half did worse, so it is not a prediction for any one person.
  • Put another way, the treated group had about 10 percent higher chance of the event at any given time (hazard ratio 1.1, likely range 0.92 to 1.32).
  • The likely range for the hazard ratio crosses 1, so the difference could be due to chance.
  • Overall survival counts deaths from any cause, so it is the most direct measure of whether a treatment helps people live longer.
  • These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Glioblastoma: nivolumab added to standard therapy (newly diagnosed, MGMT-methylated CM548; MGMT-unmethylated vs temozolomide CM498) and nivolumab vs bevacizumab at recurrence (CM143). People in a different situation may not see the same effect.
  • The trial selected people by a biomarker (MGMT); the result should not be assumed for people whose cancer does not have it.
  • Not significant.

Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.

716 participants enrolled.

Overall survival, MGMT-methylated glioblastomaprimary
HR 1.1 (0.92–1.32)
Nivolumab + RT + temozolomide
28.9 mo
Placebo + RT + temozolomide
32.1 mo

Not significant

Source
EndpointArmnValueHR (95% CI)pSource
Overall survival, MGMT-methylated glioblastomaprimaryNivolumab + RT + temozolomide35828.9 months1.1 (0.92–1.32)link
Placebo + RT + temozolomide35832.1 months
Replication
Consistent with CheckMate 143 and 498: three negative randomised trials of PD-1 blockade in glioblastoma.

Connected

10top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links