DYNAMIC
Showed that a blood test can safely halve the number of colon cancer patients given chemotherapy after surgery.
ctDNA-guided arm: 15% received chemotherapy vs 28%; 2-year RFS non-inferior (93.5% vs 92.4%). NEJM 2022. DYNAMIC-III (stage III) followed with more nuanced results.
Setting
Stage II colon cancer: ctDNA-guided adjuvant chemotherapy vs standard management
Phase
Phase 2
Sponsor
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute
Registry
Headline result
Chemotherapy use 15% vs 28% with non-inferior RFS.
Reported
2022
Enrolled
455
Replication
Supported by observational cohorts (CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY); DYNAMIC-III in stage III gave a more nuanced result, and randomised escalation trials are ongoing.
In plain words
What these results mean for people, not percentages
Recurrence-free survival at 2 years (non-inferiority)primarysurrogate endpoint
- 93.5 vs 92.4 out of 100 alive without the cancer coming back at 2 years with ctDNA-guided management compared with Standard management; 1.1 more per 100.
- Roughly one extra person helped for every 91 treated. That is a rough figure taken from the two percentages, not a guarantee for any one person.
- This is a surrogate endpoint: it measures the cancer being controlled or absent on scans and tests, which often, but not always, translates into living longer.
Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapyother endpoint
- 15 vs 28 out of 100 reached this endpoint with ctDNA-guided management compared with Standard management; 13 fewer per 100.
- On this measure the first group did worse, not better.
- The p-value (<0.001) says a difference this large would rarely happen by chance; it does not say how large or how useful the difference is.
- This endpoint is not one of the standard survival or response measures; read it alongside the trial's primary result.
Be careful
- These results apply to the people the trial enrolled: Stage II colon cancer: ctDNA-guided adjuvant chemotherapy vs standard management. People in a different situation may not see the same effect.
Numbers are from the trial as recorded here; see the source links in the table below. This is orientation, not medical advice: ask your team how closely the trial population matches you.
455 participants enrolled.
Recurrence-free survival at 2 years (non-inferiority)primary
ctDNA-guided management93.5 of 100
n = 302
Standard management92.4 of 100
n = 153
Non-inferiority met (margin −8.5 points)
SourcePatients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy
· p <0.001
ctDNA-guided management15 of 100
Standard management28 of 100
| Endpoint | Arm | n | Value | HR (95% CI) | p | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recurrence-free survival at 2 years (non-inferiority)primary | ctDNA-guided management | 302 | 93.5% | — | — | link |
| Standard management | 153 | 92.4% | ||||
| Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy | ctDNA-guided management | — | 15% | — | <0.001 | link |
| Standard management | — | 28% |
Replication
Supported by observational cohorts (CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY); DYNAMIC-III in stage III gave a more nuanced result, and randomised escalation trials are ongoing.cancers
1technologies
1institutions
1pathways
1terms
3trials
1pairings
1ideas
6A national platform trial that every ctDNA-positive patient can joinA national residual-disease weather service: serial blood tests for every curatively treated patient, pooledctDNA-guided adjuvant therapy as the default in stage II-III colon cancerFormally qualify tumour-DNA blood tests as a surrogate endpoint for adjuvant trialsStrip the platelet coat off travelling tumour cells in ctDNA-positive patientsUse tumour DNA in blood to decide when to pause treatment in metastatic cancer