OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

POLE-ultramutated endometrial cancer: the decisions you may face

4 treatment settings, 3 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Screening, prevention and diagnosis

Diagnosis and classification

2 options

Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and sentinel node mapping; molecular classification of every endometrial cancer with POLE sequencing, MMR and p53 immunohistochemistry.

The options, in plain words

Histopathology means looking at cancer cells under a microscope, and immunohistochemistry stains them for specific proteins. Together they are still the foundation of every diagnosis.

  • Cheap, fast, universal
  • Companion diagnostic for most targeted drugs

Removing just the first lymph node a tumour drains to, instead of all of them, to check for spread.

  • Avoids lymphoedema from full dissection
The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record
  • Subjective scoring
  • Single-site sampling misses heterogeneity
  • False negatives in ~5-10%
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Histopathology & immunohistochemistry and Sentinel lymph node biopsy, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in FIRES & SENTOR (sentinel node mapping), and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (diagnosis and classification), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and sentinel node mapping; molecular classification of every endometrial cancer with POLE sequencing, MMR and p53 immunohistochemistry.
  6. How do the results of FIRES & SENTOR (sentinel node mapping) apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Early / localised

Stage I to II after surgery

One path named

Observation without adjuvant treatment is acceptable under the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guideline; vaginal brachytherapy where local protocol still requires it.

The path, in plain words
BrachytherapyStandard of care

Brachytherapy places a radioactive source directly inside or next to the tumour.

  • Highest conformality
  • Short treatment
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Invasive
  • Declining expertise in some regions
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Brachytherapy the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. For my situation (stage i to ii after surgery), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Observation without adjuvant treatment is acceptable under the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guideline; vaginal brachytherapy where local protocol still requires it.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Locally advanced

Stage III after surgery

Pelvic radiotherapy without chemotherapy, as in RAINBO POLEmut-BLUE; chemoradiation with chemotherapy remains an option outside trials.

The options, in plain words

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits

Carboplatin is a platinum chemotherapy that crosslinks DNA; it is part of the standard pre-surgery regimen for triple-negative breast cancer.

A microtubule poison discovered in the Pacific yew tree, among the most used chemotherapies in breast, lung, and ovarian cancer.

The evidence behind it
  • High-risk early or stage III endometrial cancer after surgery: chemoradiation + 4 cycles chemotherapy vs pelvic radiotherapy alone
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • 5-year OS 81.4% vs 76.1% (HR 0.70); benefit concentrated in p53-abnormal disease.
    Overall survival at 5 years (%): Chemoradiation + chemotherapy 81.4 (n=330) vs Radiotherapy alone 76.1 (n=330) · HR 0.7 · source
The main trade-offs on record
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Dose by Calvert formula using GFR (see the calculators).
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), Carboplatin and Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in PORTEC-3, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (stage iii after surgery), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Pelvic radiotherapy without chemotherapy, as in RAINBO POLEmut-BLUE; chemoradiation with chemotherapy remains an option outside trials.
  6. Am I a candidate for Carboplatin, Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  7. How do the results of PORTEC-3 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

Advanced or recurrent (rare)

Checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy by extrapolation from the mismatch-repair-deficient class.

The options, in plain words

Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody approved in more than 40 settings, from melanoma and lung cancer to the first tumour-agnostic approval for mismatch-repair-deficient tumours in 2017, and before and after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer. A subcutaneous form arrived in 2025, and it is the backbone partner for ADCs and personalised neoantigen vaccines.

Dostarlimab is a PD-1 blocker famous for making rectal cancer disappear without surgery in every patient with a mismatch-repair-deficient tumour.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 that release the brakes on T cells so they attack the cancer. They are approved in more than 20 tumour types and produce lasting, sometimes curative responses that chemotherapy rarely does, but most patients do not respond and autoimmune side effects are the cost.

  • Durable, sometimes curative responses
  • Broad applicability
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hypothyroidism (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients8%-
Pneumonitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients3.4%-
Colitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients1.7%-
Hepatitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients0.7%-
  • No pharmacokinetic interactions expected (antibody). See the irAE guide for toxicity management.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Most patients do not respond
  • Autoimmune toxicity
  • Biomarkers are imperfect
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Pembrolizumab, Dostarlimab and Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Pembrolizumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (advanced or recurrent (rare)), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy by extrapolation from the mismatch-repair-deficient class.
  6. Am I a candidate for Pembrolizumab, Dostarlimab, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.