OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

High-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: the decisions you may face

5 treatment settings, 5 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

hCG, chest CT, brain MRI, abdominal imaging, pelvic Doppler ultrasound and FIGO scoring; genotyping where the antecedent pregnancy is unclear.

The options, in plain words
CT (computed tomography)Standard of care

A CT scan is a fast 3D X-ray that shows the size and shape of tumours and whether they have spread.

  • Fast, ubiquitous
  • Sub-millimetre resolution
  • Standard for RECIST response
MRIStandard of care

MRI uses a strong magnet and radio waves, with no ionising radiation, to picture soft tissue in finer contrast than CT, so it is the standard scan for brain tumours, prostate, rectal cancer staging, liver lesions and breast screening in high-risk women. It is slow, expensive and blurred by movement.

  • No ionising radiation
  • Best soft-tissue and brain imaging
  • Functional sequences (diffusion, perfusion)
UltrasoundStandard of care

Ultrasound uses sound waves to make live pictures; it is cheap, safe, and used to guide needles into lumps.

  • Real-time, portable, no radiation
  • Ideal biopsy guidance
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Anatomic only; cannot distinguish scar from live tumour
  • Radiation dose
  • Poor for brain, marrow, and small peritoneal disease
  • Slow and expensive
  • Motion artefacts
  • Gadolinium concerns in renal impairment
  • Operator dependent
  • Cannot see through bone or air
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between CT (computed tomography), MRI and Ultrasound, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (staging), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: hCG, chest CT, brain MRI, abdominal imaging, pelvic Doppler ultrasound and FIGO scoring; genotyping where the antecedent pregnancy is unclear.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Early / localised

High-risk disease, first line

EMA-CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D alternating with cyclophosphamide and vincristine) until hCG normalises plus at least three consolidation cycles.

The options, in plain words

Etoposide is a chemotherapy from the mayapple plant, essential to curing testicular cancer (BEP), treating small-cell lung cancer, lymphomas, childhood sarcomas and leukaemias, and used in transplant conditioning.

The 1948 antifolate that produced the first chemotherapy remissions in childhood leukaemia and the first cure of a solid tumour; still essential in ALL, lymphoma, osteosarcoma and CNS lymphoma.

The first antibiotic used as an anticancer drug (1954) and still the core of chemotherapy for Wilms tumour, rhabdomyosarcoma and gestational trophoblastic disease.

Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating chemotherapy that damages DNA in dividing cells. It is part of CHOP for lymphoma, AC for breast cancer and VAC for childhood sarcomas, clears lymphocytes before CAR-T and prevents graft-versus-host disease after transplant; bladder bleeding, infertility and secondary leukaemia are its harms.

A plant-derived chemotherapy from the Madagascar periwinkle that has been in almost every childhood leukaemia and lymphoma regimen since the 1960s.

Cytotoxic chemotherapyStandard of care

Cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs (platinums, antimetabolites, microtubule agents and topoisomerase inhibitors) kill rapidly dividing cells by damaging DNA or the mitotic spindle. They still cure testicular cancer, lymphoma and leukaemia, and they are the warhead inside antibody-drug conjugates, but a narrow margin between effective and toxic doses is their limitation.

  • Curative in several cancers
  • Cheap, generic
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Reduce to 75% for CrCl 15-50.
  • High-dose methotrexate requires normal renal function, hydration, urine alkalinisation and leucovorin rescue with level monitoring.
  • Fatal if given intrathecally: label all syringes.
  • Narrow therapeutic index
  • Resistance via efflux pumps and DNA repair
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Etoposide, Methotrexate, Dactinomycin (actinomycin D) and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (high-risk disease, first line), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: EMA-CO (etoposide, methotrexate, actinomycin D alternating with cyclophosphamide and vincristine) until hCG normalises plus at least three consolidation cycles.
  6. Am I a candidate for Etoposide, Methotrexate, Dactinomycin (actinomycin D) or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Early / localised

Ultra-high-risk disease

Induction low-dose etoposide and cisplatin for one to three cycles before EMA-CO to prevent early death from haemorrhage and organ failure.

The options, in plain words

Etoposide is a chemotherapy from the mayapple plant, essential to curing testicular cancer (BEP), treating small-cell lung cancer, lymphomas, childhood sarcomas and leukaemias, and used in transplant conditioning.

Cisplatin is the original platinum chemotherapy, discovered by accident in 1965; it cures testicular cancer and makes radiation work better in cervical and head and neck cancer.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Reduce to 75% for CrCl 15-50.
  • Dose reduce or avoid for CrCl below 60 (carboplatin is the alternative).
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Etoposide and Cisplatin, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (ultra-high-risk disease), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Induction low-dose etoposide and cisplatin for one to three cycles before EMA-CO to prevent early death from haemorrhage and organ failure.
  6. Am I a candidate for Etoposide, Cisplatin, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Special situations

Brain metastases

3 options

High-dose systemic and intrathecal methotrexate within EMA-CO, with whole-brain or stereotactic radiotherapy or craniotomy for bleeding or single lesions.

The options, in plain words

The 1948 antifolate that produced the first chemotherapy remissions in childhood leukaemia and the first cure of a solid tumour; still essential in ALL, lymphoma, osteosarcoma and CNS lymphoma.

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits

Stereotactic body radiotherapy converges multiple beams with sub-millimetre accuracy to deliver tumour-destroying doses in one to five outpatient sessions, doing the job of surgery for inoperable early lung cancer and for metastases in liver, spine and brain. Tumour size and location limit its use, and late toxicity is a concern near the central airways.

  • Ablative doses with minimal recovery
  • Outpatient
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • High-dose methotrexate requires normal renal function, hydration, urine alkalinisation and leucovorin rescue with level monitoring.
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Size and location limits
  • Late toxicity near central airways
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Methotrexate, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam) and SBRT / SABR (stereotactic radiotherapy), which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (brain metastases), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: High-dose systemic and intrathecal methotrexate within EMA-CO, with whole-brain or stereotactic radiotherapy or craniotomy for bleeding or single lesions.
  6. Am I a candidate for Methotrexate, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

Resistant or relapsed disease

EP-EMA or TP/TE; resection of a resistant focus (hysterectomy, lung wedge); pembrolizumab or avelumab; high-dose chemotherapy with autologous rescue in exceptional cases.

The options, in plain words

Etoposide is a chemotherapy from the mayapple plant, essential to curing testicular cancer (BEP), treating small-cell lung cancer, lymphomas, childhood sarcomas and leukaemias, and used in transplant conditioning.

Cisplatin is the original platinum chemotherapy, discovered by accident in 1965; it cures testicular cancer and makes radiation work better in cervical and head and neck cancer.

A microtubule poison discovered in the Pacific yew tree, among the most used chemotherapies in breast, lung, and ovarian cancer.

Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody approved in more than 40 settings, from melanoma and lung cancer to the first tumour-agnostic approval for mismatch-repair-deficient tumours in 2017, and before and after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer. A subcutaneous form arrived in 2025, and it is the backbone partner for ADCs and personalised neoantigen vaccines.

Avelumab is a PD-L1 blocker given as maintenance after chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer, which lengthened survival by about seven months.

Autologous stem cell transplant collects the patient's own blood-forming stem cells, gives melphalan or another chemotherapy at a dose that would otherwise destroy the marrow, then returns the cells to rebuild it. It is standard consolidation in myeloma and for relapsed lymphoma, though CAR-T has displaced it in early-relapsing large B-cell lymphoma.

  • Permits dose intensity impossible otherwise
  • Decades of outcome data
  • Widely available
PET/CTStandard of care

PET and CT in one machine, so hot spots on the PET are pinned to exact locations on the CT.

  • Anatomy plus biology
  • Standard for lymphoma, lung, melanoma, head and neck staging
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Reduce to 75% for CrCl 15-50.
  • Dose reduce or avoid for CrCl below 60 (carboplatin is the alternative).
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hypothyroidism (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients8%-
Pneumonitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients3.4%-
Colitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients1.7%-
Hepatitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients0.7%-
  • No pharmacokinetic interactions expected (antibody). See the irAE guide for toxicity management.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Treatment-related mortality ~1-2% (myeloma) to higher in children
  • Infertility, second malignancies, prolonged cytopenias
  • Being challenged by CAR-T and MRD-guided deferral
  • CT radiation added to PET dose
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Etoposide, Cisplatin, Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Pembrolizumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (resistant or relapsed disease), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: EP-EMA or TP/TE; resection of a resistant focus (hysterectomy, lung wedge); pembrolizumab or avelumab; high-dose chemotherapy with autologous rescue in exceptional cases.
  7. Am I a candidate for Etoposide, Cisplatin, Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.