OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: the decisions you may face

5 treatment settings, 2 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

One path named

Serial hCG after molar evacuation; pelvic Doppler ultrasound and chest X-ray or CT; FIGO scoring; no biopsy needed.

The path, in plain words
UltrasoundStandard of care

Ultrasound uses sound waves to make live pictures; it is cheap, safe, and used to guide needles into lumps.

  • Real-time, portable, no radiation
  • Ideal biopsy guidance
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Operator dependent
  • Cannot see through bone or air
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Ultrasound the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (diagnosis and staging), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Serial hCG after molar evacuation; pelvic Doppler ultrasound and chest X-ray or CT; FIGO scoring; no biopsy needed.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Single-agent methotrexate with folinic acid (eight-day regimen) or pulsed actinomycin D (GOG 174), continued until hCG normalises plus three consolidation cycles.

The options, in plain words

The 1948 antifolate that produced the first chemotherapy remissions in childhood leukaemia and the first cure of a solid tumour; still essential in ALL, lymphoma, osteosarcoma and CNS lymphoma.

The first antibiotic used as an anticancer drug (1954) and still the core of chemotherapy for Wilms tumour, rhabdomyosarcoma and gestational trophoblastic disease.

Cytotoxic chemotherapyStandard of care

Cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs (platinums, antimetabolites, microtubule agents and topoisomerase inhibitors) kill rapidly dividing cells by damaging DNA or the mitotic spindle. They still cure testicular cancer, lymphoma and leukaemia, and they are the warhead inside antibody-drug conjugates, but a narrow margin between effective and toxic doses is their limitation.

  • Curative in several cancers
  • Cheap, generic
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • High-dose methotrexate requires normal renal function, hydration, urine alkalinisation and leucovorin rescue with level monitoring.
  • Narrow therapeutic index
  • Resistance via efflux pumps and DNA repair
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Methotrexate, Dactinomycin (actinomycin D) and Cytotoxic chemotherapy, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (first line), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Single-agent methotrexate with folinic acid (eight-day regimen) or pulsed actinomycin D (GOG 174), continued until hCG normalises plus three consolidation cycles.
  6. Am I a candidate for Methotrexate, Dactinomycin (actinomycin D), and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

Resistance to first agent

Switch to the alternative single agent if hCG is low; EMA-CO if hCG is high; avelumab or pembrolizumab as chemotherapy-sparing options (TROPHIMMUN).

The options, in plain words

The first antibiotic used as an anticancer drug (1954) and still the core of chemotherapy for Wilms tumour, rhabdomyosarcoma and gestational trophoblastic disease.

The 1948 antifolate that produced the first chemotherapy remissions in childhood leukaemia and the first cure of a solid tumour; still essential in ALL, lymphoma, osteosarcoma and CNS lymphoma.

Etoposide is a chemotherapy from the mayapple plant, essential to curing testicular cancer (BEP), treating small-cell lung cancer, lymphomas, childhood sarcomas and leukaemias, and used in transplant conditioning.

Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating chemotherapy that damages DNA in dividing cells. It is part of CHOP for lymphoma, AC for breast cancer and VAC for childhood sarcomas, clears lymphocytes before CAR-T and prevents graft-versus-host disease after transplant; bladder bleeding, infertility and secondary leukaemia are its harms.

A plant-derived chemotherapy from the Madagascar periwinkle that has been in almost every childhood leukaemia and lymphoma regimen since the 1960s.

Avelumab is a PD-L1 blocker given as maintenance after chemotherapy for advanced bladder cancer, which lengthened survival by about seven months.

Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody approved in more than 40 settings, from melanoma and lung cancer to the first tumour-agnostic approval for mismatch-repair-deficient tumours in 2017, and before and after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer. A subcutaneous form arrived in 2025, and it is the backbone partner for ADCs and personalised neoantigen vaccines.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • High-dose methotrexate requires normal renal function, hydration, urine alkalinisation and leucovorin rescue with level monitoring.
  • Reduce to 75% for CrCl 15-50.
  • Fatal if given intrathecally: label all syringes.
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hypothyroidism (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients8%-
Pneumonitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients3.4%-
Colitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients1.7%-
Hepatitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients0.7%-
  • No pharmacokinetic interactions expected (antibody). See the irAE guide for toxicity management.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Dactinomycin (actinomycin D), Methotrexate, Etoposide and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Pembrolizumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (resistance to first agent), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Switch to the alternative single agent if hCG is low; EMA-CO if hCG is high; avelumab or pembrolizumab as chemotherapy-sparing options (TROPHIMMUN).
  7. Am I a candidate for Dactinomycin (actinomycin D), Methotrexate, Etoposide or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

One path named

Second uterine evacuation in selected women with low hCG; hysterectomy for women who have completed their families or with uncontrolled bleeding.

The path, in plain words

Protecting the ability to have children before cancer treatment that damages eggs, sperm or the womb: sperm and egg or embryo freezing, ovarian tissue freezing, ovarian shielding and, for some breast cancers, temporary ovarian suppression.

  • Established live-birth outcomes for sperm, oocyte, embryo and ovarian tissue
  • Random-start protocols avoid treatment delay
  • POSITIVE trial reassures about pregnancy after breast cancer
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cost and insurance coverage (mandated in only some US states)
  • Prepubertal boys have only experimental options
  • Referral gaps, especially in men, adolescents and LMICs
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Oncofertility and fertility preservation the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (surgery), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Second uterine evacuation in selected women with low hCG; hysterectomy for women who have completed their families or with uncontrolled bleeding.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Described in words

hCG monitoring for twelve months after remission, contraception during follow-up, and hCG after every future pregnancy.

The path, in plain words

This setting names no product or technology record yet; the approach above is the standard as written. Ask your team which specific treatments they mean.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record

No side-effect rates or interaction flags are recorded for these options yet. The side-effect lookup and interaction checker cover the products that have them.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Which specific treatments are you proposing for this setting, and what are the alternatives?
    Why: The standard of care here is described in words rather than named products; ask for the names.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (follow-up), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: hCG monitoring for twelve months after remission, contraception during follow-up, and hCG after every future pregnancy.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.