OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Placental-site trophoblastic tumour and epithelioid trophoblastic tumour: the decisions you may face

5 treatment settings, 3 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Expert pathology with immunohistochemistry (human placental lactogen, p63, Ki-67) and genotyping; pelvic MRI, chest CT and FDG-PET; registration with a trophoblastic disease centre.

The options, in plain words

Histopathology means looking at cancer cells under a microscope, and immunohistochemistry stains them for specific proteins. Together they are still the foundation of every diagnosis.

  • Cheap, fast, universal
  • Companion diagnostic for most targeted drugs
MRIStandard of care

MRI uses a strong magnet and radio waves, with no ionising radiation, to picture soft tissue in finer contrast than CT, so it is the standard scan for brain tumours, prostate, rectal cancer staging, liver lesions and breast screening in high-risk women. It is slow, expensive and blurred by movement.

  • No ionising radiation
  • Best soft-tissue and brain imaging
  • Functional sequences (diffusion, perfusion)
CT (computed tomography)Standard of care

A CT scan is a fast 3D X-ray that shows the size and shape of tumours and whether they have spread.

  • Fast, ubiquitous
  • Sub-millimetre resolution
  • Standard for RECIST response
PET/CTStandard of care

PET and CT in one machine, so hot spots on the PET are pinned to exact locations on the CT.

  • Anatomy plus biology
  • Standard for lymphoma, lung, melanoma, head and neck staging
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Subjective scoring
  • Single-site sampling misses heterogeneity
  • Slow and expensive
  • Motion artefacts
  • Gadolinium concerns in renal impairment
  • Anatomic only; cannot distinguish scar from live tumour
  • Radiation dose
  • Poor for brain, marrow, and small peritoneal disease
  • CT radiation added to PET dose
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Histopathology & immunohistochemistry, MRI, CT (computed tomography) and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (diagnosis), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Expert pathology with immunohistochemistry (human placental lactogen, p63, Ki-67) and genotyping; pelvic MRI, chest CT and FDG-PET; registration with a trophoblastic disease centre.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Other settings

Disease confined to the uterus

One path named

Total hysterectomy with ovarian preservation; pelvic node sampling considered; fertility-sparing local resection only in exceptional cases with close follow-up.

The path, in plain words

Protecting the ability to have children before cancer treatment that damages eggs, sperm or the womb: sperm and egg or embryo freezing, ovarian tissue freezing, ovarian shielding and, for some breast cancers, temporary ovarian suppression.

  • Established live-birth outcomes for sperm, oocyte, embryo and ovarian tissue
  • Random-start protocols avoid treatment delay
  • POSITIVE trial reassures about pregnancy after breast cancer
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cost and insurance coverage (mandated in only some US states)
  • Prepubertal boys have only experimental options
  • Referral gaps, especially in men, adolescents and LMICs
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Oncofertility and fertility preservation the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (disease confined to the uterus), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Total hysterectomy with ovarian preservation; pelvic node sampling considered; fertility-sparing local resection only in exceptional cases with close follow-up.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

Metastatic disease or interval over four years

Multi-agent platinum-based chemotherapy (EP-EMA or TP/TE) with resection of residual disease; EMA-CO alone is insufficient.

The options, in plain words

Etoposide is a chemotherapy from the mayapple plant, essential to curing testicular cancer (BEP), treating small-cell lung cancer, lymphomas, childhood sarcomas and leukaemias, and used in transplant conditioning.

Cisplatin is the original platinum chemotherapy, discovered by accident in 1965; it cures testicular cancer and makes radiation work better in cervical and head and neck cancer.

The 1948 antifolate that produced the first chemotherapy remissions in childhood leukaemia and the first cure of a solid tumour; still essential in ALL, lymphoma, osteosarcoma and CNS lymphoma.

The first antibiotic used as an anticancer drug (1954) and still the core of chemotherapy for Wilms tumour, rhabdomyosarcoma and gestational trophoblastic disease.

A microtubule poison discovered in the Pacific yew tree, among the most used chemotherapies in breast, lung, and ovarian cancer.

Cytotoxic chemotherapyStandard of care

Cytotoxic chemotherapy drugs (platinums, antimetabolites, microtubule agents and topoisomerase inhibitors) kill rapidly dividing cells by damaging DNA or the mitotic spindle. They still cure testicular cancer, lymphoma and leukaemia, and they are the warhead inside antibody-drug conjugates, but a narrow margin between effective and toxic doses is their limitation.

  • Curative in several cancers
  • Cheap, generic
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Reduce to 75% for CrCl 15-50.
  • Dose reduce or avoid for CrCl below 60 (carboplatin is the alternative).
  • High-dose methotrexate requires normal renal function, hydration, urine alkalinisation and leucovorin rescue with level monitoring.
  • Narrow therapeutic index
  • Resistance via efflux pumps and DNA repair
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Etoposide, Cisplatin, Methotrexate and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (metastatic disease or interval over four years), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Multi-agent platinum-based chemotherapy (EP-EMA or TP/TE) with resection of residual disease; EMA-CO alone is insufficient.
  6. Am I a candidate for Etoposide, Cisplatin, Methotrexate or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

Resistant disease

3 options

Surgical excision of chemoresistant deposits; high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in selected cases; pembrolizumab in trials or on a case basis.

The options, in plain words

Autologous stem cell transplant collects the patient's own blood-forming stem cells, gives melphalan or another chemotherapy at a dose that would otherwise destroy the marrow, then returns the cells to rebuild it. It is standard consolidation in myeloma and for relapsed lymphoma, though CAR-T has displaced it in early-relapsing large B-cell lymphoma.

  • Permits dose intensity impossible otherwise
  • Decades of outcome data
  • Widely available

Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody approved in more than 40 settings, from melanoma and lung cancer to the first tumour-agnostic approval for mismatch-repair-deficient tumours in 2017, and before and after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer. A subcutaneous form arrived in 2025, and it is the backbone partner for ADCs and personalised neoantigen vaccines.

PET/CTStandard of care

PET and CT in one machine, so hot spots on the PET are pinned to exact locations on the CT.

  • Anatomy plus biology
  • Standard for lymphoma, lung, melanoma, head and neck staging
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Treatment-related mortality ~1-2% (myeloma) to higher in children
  • Infertility, second malignancies, prolonged cytopenias
  • Being challenged by CAR-T and MRD-guided deferral
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hypothyroidism (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients8%-
Pneumonitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients3.4%-
Colitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients1.7%-
Hepatitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients0.7%-
  • No pharmacokinetic interactions expected (antibody). See the irAE guide for toxicity management.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • CT radiation added to PET dose
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Autologous stem cell transplant (high-dose therapy), Pembrolizumab and PET/CT, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Pembrolizumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (resistant disease), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Surgical excision of chemoresistant deposits; high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in selected cases; pembrolizumab in trials or on a case basis.
  7. Am I a candidate for Pembrolizumab, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

One path named

Clinical review with hCG and imaging, because hCG alone can miss recurrence; prolonged surveillance for late relapse.

The path, in plain words
MRIStandard of care

MRI uses a strong magnet and radio waves, with no ionising radiation, to picture soft tissue in finer contrast than CT, so it is the standard scan for brain tumours, prostate, rectal cancer staging, liver lesions and breast screening in high-risk women. It is slow, expensive and blurred by movement.

  • No ionising radiation
  • Best soft-tissue and brain imaging
  • Functional sequences (diffusion, perfusion)
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Slow and expensive
  • Motion artefacts
  • Gadolinium concerns in renal impairment
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is MRI the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (follow-up), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Clinical review with hCG and imaging, because hCG alone can miss recurrence; prolonged surveillance for late relapse.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.