Everything in development, the medicines held by this cancer's subtypes, the open problems and what is being done about them, the roadmaps, and what changed on this record.
What is in development for Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, drawn from the whole corpus: 0 items. Drugs are grouped by the most advanced trial phase they have reached anywhere; approved treatments sit under standard of care. Technologies are the methods being tested for this cancer, trials are the studies recorded here, and ideas are proposals not yet in a trial.
Nothing recorded in development for this cancer yet.
The consensus recommendations that govern treatment state that most of the evidence behind them is small retrospective series and case reports, and that very few prospective or multicentre studies exist.
The line between this disease and lymphomatoid papulosis is drawn on the clinical course rather than on the biopsy, and in a person who has both there is no test that settles which lesion is which.
Over-treatment is the commonest harm: combination chemotherapy for skin-limited disease produces short remissions in a condition that is otherwise controlled for decades.
Dated changes read from the records linked to this cancer: approvals, regulatory steps, reported trials, guideline versions and milestones. Newest first; no date is inferred.
On EdgeAll 8 changes by month →When this page itself was last checked or edited.
The diagnosis cannot be made on the biopsy alone, because the cells look identical to those of systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma. It requires staging that shows no disease outside the skin, and a clinical history: how long the lesion has been there, whether others have come and gone, and whether the person has lymphomatoid papulosis or mycosis fungoides, which coexist with it. An ALK-positive skin tumour is usually systemic disease that has reached the skin, and is staged and treated as such.
WHO-HAEM5 groups primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma under the primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, acknowledging its relationship to them and its favourable outcome in contrast to systemic ALK-negative disease.
Brentuximab vedotin produced far more objective responses lasting at least four months than methotrexate or bexarotene; approved in November 2017.
Low-dose weekly methotrexate for disease that keeps recurring in many places. Brentuximab vedotin for widespread or extracutaneous disease: ALCANZA randomised patients with CD30-positive mycosis fungoides or primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma to brentuximab vedotin against the physician's choice of methotrexate or bexarotene, and the figures are on the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma page. Combination chemotherapy is reserved for disease outside the skin: it produces short remissions and real harm in a disease otherwise controlled for decades, and over-treatment is the commonest avoidable harm here.
Surgical excision or local radiotherapy. Both work; the choice is made on the site, the size and what will heal well. Lesions recur in a substantial proportion of patients, 42 per cent in the Stanford series, and recurrence in the skin is expected rather than a treatment failure: it is treated the same way again. Up to a quarter of lesions regress partly or completely without any treatment, so observing a lesion that is already shrinking is reasonable.