OnCo
ideasIdea

Alert guidelines and trials when a paper they rely on is retracted

When a study is retracted, everything built on it should get a warning. Today, retracted cancer papers keep being cited and used for years.

Retracted papers continue to be cited, and guidelines or trial protocols that relied on them are rarely revisited. A service that maps retractions and expressions of concern (from Retraction Watch and publishers) onto the citation graph and notifies guideline bodies, trial registries and systematic reviews that cite the retracted work would close a loop that is currently open.

Hypothesis
Within a year of launch, at least 80% of oncology guidelines citing a retracted paper have been notified and at least half have issued an update or statement.
Rationale
Retraction Watch's database now makes retractions machine-readable; citation graphs from OpenAlex make propagation computable. The missing piece is delivery to the people who act on the evidence.
What would test it
Run the service over oncology guidelines from three societies; count notifications and responses.
Maturity
speculative
Who has to act
data
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
1
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

6top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links