The International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, known as the Red Journal, is the American Society for Radiation Oncology's journal and the main US venue for radiotherapy trials, dose and fractionation evidence, physics and toxicity research, including NRG and RTOG cooperative-group results. Access is hybrid.
The International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics (IJROBP), known as the Red Journal, is the journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), founded in 1975 and published by Elsevier on a hybrid access model. It is the main US venue for radiation oncology trials, dose-fractionation evidence, physics and toxicity research, publishing NRG and RTOG cooperative-group trials, stereotactic and hypofractionation studies, radiobiology and ASTRO clinical practice guidelines, with the ASTRO annual meeting abstracts as a supplement. Its readers are radiation oncologists, physicists and radiobiologists. Within OnCo it is related to the ASTRO Annual Meeting source and linked from the Albert Koong and Anthony Zietman biographies.
A second publication from the CONVERT trial, later than the first and described in its title as an update or longer-term analysis. Read it with the primary publication linked from the trial page; the record was linked automatically and its figures have not been checked by hand.
For men with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer, protons and modern IMRT give the same excellent quality of life and cancer control, so the choice can rest on access, cost and convenience rather than on an expected sparing of bowel or bladder. The result removes prostate cancer from the list of adult indications where a proton advantage was assumed but untested.
One trial page and one technology page on OnCo cite this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing pages listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
Imaging the prostate before every session is now standard, and this trial supports it for rectal side effects and PSA control. It also shows how hard it is to turn a physical gain in accuracy into a survival result, and that a randomised trial can throw up an unexplained difference that should be reported rather than smoothed over.
With image guidance, a larger safety margin around a brain metastasis did not buy better tumour control and added healthy brain to the high-dose region. It is one of the few randomised tests of a margin itself.
One trial page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
In the recipe a systematic error, one repeated at every session, costs about three and a half times as much margin as a random error of the same size, so reducing systematic error is the larger lever for shrinking the margin.
Albert Koong is a radiation oncologist leading MD Anderson's radiation department, with a focus on pancreatic cancer and SBRT.
Led the proton dose-escalation trial in prostate cancer and the comparative-effectiveness debate over proton therapy.
A second publication from the CONVERT trial, later than the first and described in its title as an update or longer-term analysis. Read it with the primary publication linked from the trial page; the record was linked automatically and its figures have not been checked by hand.
For men with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer, protons and modern IMRT give the same excellent quality of life and cancer control, so the choice can rest on access, cost and convenience rather than on an expected sparing of bowel or bladder. The result removes prostate cancer from the list of adult indications where a proton advantage was assumed but untested.
One trial page and one technology page on OnCo cite this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing pages listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
Imaging the prostate before every session is now standard, and this trial supports it for rectal side effects and PSA control. It also shows how hard it is to turn a physical gain in accuracy into a survival result, and that a randomised trial can throw up an unexplained difference that should be reported rather than smoothed over.
With image guidance, a larger safety margin around a brain metastasis did not buy better tumour control and added healthy brain to the high-dose region. It is one of the few randomised tests of a margin itself.
One trial page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
Shares The probability of correct target dosage: dose-population histograms for deriving treatment margins in radiotherapy, Daily versus weekly prostate cancer image guided radiation therapy: phase 3 multicenter randomized trial, Defining the optimal planning target volume in image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: results of a randomized trial.
Shares ASTRO Annual Meeting, Anthony L. Zietman.
Every source this page cites, grouped by who published it. Grouping is read from the web address, not assigned by hand.
A source that has moved or gone is reported by the weekly link check. /audit/