The 2010 rule that fixed the line between hormone receptor-positive and negative breast cancer at 1 percent of stained tumour nuclei, after finding that up to a fifth of receptor tests worldwide might be wrong; it is the threshold that defines triple-negative disease.
ASCO and College of American Pathologists guideline by Hammond, Hayes, Dowsett, Allred and colleagues, developed with Cancer Care Ontario from a systematic review. Up to 20 percent of immunohistochemical oestrogen and progesterone receptor determinations worldwide may be inaccurate, mostly through variation in pre-analytic handling, positivity thresholds and interpretation. The panel recommends that receptor status be determined on all invasive breast cancers and recurrences, proposes a testing algorithm with specified elements to reduce assay variation, and recommends that assays be considered positive if at least 1 percent of tumour nuclei stain in the presence of expected internal and external control reactivity. The absence of endocrine therapy benefit in receptor-negative disease has been confirmed in large overviews of randomised trials.
Triple-negative is a laboratory definition; this guideline wrote the oestrogen and progesterone half of it, and the 1 to 10 percent low-positive band it created is still argued over.
Shares Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Digital pathology & AI, Biomarkers are not validated or standardised, Triple-negative breast cancer roadmap: from a remainder defined by three negative tests to immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates and the residual disease problem and the tag tnbc-evidence.
Shares American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Triple-negative breast cancer roadmap: from a remainder defined by three negative tests to immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates and the residual disease problem, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the tag tnbc-evidence.
Shares American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Biomarkers are not validated or standardised, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the tag tnbc-evidence.
Shares American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Digital pathology & AI, Biomarkers are not validated or standardised and the tag tnbc-evidence.
Shares Digital pathology & AI, Biomarkers are not validated or standardised, Triple-negative breast cancer roadmap: from a remainder defined by three negative tests to immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates and the residual disease problem, Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the tag tnbc-evidence.
Shares American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Triple-negative breast cancer roadmap: from a remainder defined by three negative tests to immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates and the residual disease problem, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the tag tnbc-evidence.
Shares Immunohistochemistry (IHC), Digital pathology & AI, Biomarkers are not validated or standardised, Triple-negative breast cancer roadmap: from a remainder defined by three negative tests to immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates and the residual disease problem and the tag tnbc-evidence.
Shares American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), Triple-negative breast cancer roadmap: from a remainder defined by three negative tests to immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates and the residual disease problem, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the tag tnbc-evidence.