Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation
Phase 2 or 3 results paper on BRAF in Melanoma, in New England Journal of Medicine (2015), one of the most cited Europe PMC records with BRAF in its title.
Overview
Background: Nivolumab was associated with higher rates of objective response than chemotherapy in a phase 3 study involving patients with ipilimumab-refractory metastatic melanoma. The use of nivolumab in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma has not been tested in a phase 3 controlled study.
Methods: We randomly assigned 418 previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks and dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks and nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival.
Results: At 1 year, the overall rate of survival was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 78.9) in the nivolumab group, as compared with 42.1% (95% CI, 33.0 to 50.9) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.42; 99.79% CI, 0.25 to 0.73; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the nivolumab group versus 2.2 months in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death or progression of disease, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 40.0% (95% CI, 33.3 to 47.0) in the nivolumab group versus 13.9% (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.4) in the dacarbazine group (odds ratio, 4.06; P<0.001). The survival benefit with nivolumab versus dacarbazine was observed across prespecified subgroups, including subgroups defined by status regarding the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Common adverse events associated with nivolumab included fatigue, pruritus, and nausea. Drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 11.7% of the patients treated with nivolumab and 17.6% of those treated with dacarbazine.
Conclusions: Nivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, as compared with dacarbazine, among previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 066 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01721772.).
Indexed on Europe PMC as PubMed record 25399552 (DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1412082). Its title names BRAF and its text names Melanoma; PubMed types it as a clinical trial report (Clinical Trial, Phase III, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Randomized Controlled Trial). It was matched automatically to the idea "Test intermittent dosing of targeted drugs to delay resistance, with honest priors" and no figure has been checked by an editor.
One of the most cited trial reports Europe PMC returns for BRAF in Melanoma, so it is a natural first reading for anyone weighing the idea it is linked from. The record was linked automatically by title and abstract; read the abstract above and the paper itself before relying on any figure.
- Matched by BRAF in the title and Melanoma in the title or abstract of the Europe PMC record; the summary reproduces the record's abstract and no figure has been verified against the full paper.
- Chosen as a phase 2 or 3 report by the record's publication type or its own wording, not by reading the paper.
Similar pages
not linked directly; found by shared links- Key paperCrizotinib versus chemotherapy in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer
Shares Test intermittent dosing of targeted drugs to delay resistance, with honest priors, New England Journal of Medicine.
- Key paperBRIM-3: improved survival with vemurafenib in melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation
Shares Test intermittent dosing of targeted drugs to delay resistance, with honest priors, New England Journal of Medicine.