Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Phase 2 or 3 results paper on Niraparib in Ovarian cancer, in New England Journal of Medicine (2016), one of the most cited Europe PMC records with Niraparib in its title.
Overview
Background: Niraparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in patients with ovarian cancer. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib versus placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA cohort and non-gBRCA cohort) and the type of non-gBRCA mutation and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival.
Results: Of 553 enrolled patients, 203 were in the gBRCA cohort (with 138 assigned to niraparib and 65 to placebo), and 350 patients were in the non-gBRCA cohort (with 234 assigned to niraparib and 116 to placebo). Patients in the niraparib group had a significantly longer median duration of progression-free survival than did those in the placebo group, including 21.0 vs. 5.5 months in the gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.41), as compared with 12.9 months vs. 3.8 months in the non-gBRCA cohort for patients who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.59) and 9.3 months vs. 3.9 months in the overall non-gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61; P<0.001 for all three comparisons). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in the niraparib group were thrombocytopenia (in 33.8%), anemia (in 25.3%), and neutropenia (in 19.6%), which were managed with dose modifications.
Conclusions: Among patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of gBRCA mutations or HRD status, with moderate bone marrow toxicity. (Funded by Tesaro; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01847274.).
Indexed on Europe PMC as PubMed record 27717299 (DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1611310). Its title names Niraparib and its text names Ovarian cancer; PubMed types it as a clinical trial report (Clinical Trial, Phase III, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial). It was matched automatically to the idea "ctDNA-guided duration of PARP maintenance" and no figure has been checked by an editor.
One of the most cited trial reports Europe PMC returns for Niraparib in Ovarian cancer, so it is a natural first reading for anyone weighing the idea it is linked from. The record was linked automatically by title and abstract; read the abstract above and the paper itself before relying on any figure.
- Matched by Niraparib in the title and Ovarian cancer in the title or abstract of the Europe PMC record; the summary reproduces the record's abstract and no figure has been verified against the full paper.
- Chosen as a phase 2 or 3 report by the record's publication type or its own wording, not by reading the paper.
Similar pages
not linked directly; found by shared links- Key paperPRIMA: niraparib maintenance in newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer
Shares ctDNA-guided duration of PARP maintenance, New England Journal of Medicine.
- Key paperSOLO-1: two years of olaparib maintenance after first-line chemotherapy for BRCA-mutated ovarian cancer
Shares ctDNA-guided duration of PARP maintenance, New England Journal of Medicine.