OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: the decisions you may face

6 treatment settings, 6 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

3 options

FDG-PET/CT with Lugano staging, International Prognostic Score, fertility counselling and cardiac and pulmonary baselines.

The options, in plain words
FDG PETStandard of care

FDG PET is the standard PET scan. A radioactive sugar shows which tissues are burning glucose fast, which most cancers do.

  • Universal availability
  • Decades of validation

Protecting the ability to have children before cancer treatment that damages eggs, sperm or the womb: sperm and egg or embryo freezing, ovarian tissue freezing, ovarian shielding and, for some breast cancers, temporary ovarian suppression.

  • Established live-birth outcomes for sperm, oocyte, embryo and ovarian tissue
  • Random-start protocols avoid treatment delay
  • POSITIVE trial reassures about pregnancy after breast cancer
Cardio-oncologyEstablished

Cardio-oncology builds heart risk assessment, monitoring and prevention into cancer care so patients can finish curative treatment without trading cancer for heart failure. It targets anthracycline and trastuzumab damage, checkpoint-inhibitor myocarditis and radiation heart disease using echocardiography, troponin tests and protective drugs; specialist clinics are concentrated in large centres.

  • Enables completion of curative therapy
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Non-specific: infection and inflammation are also hot
  • Brain background
  • Poor in indolent tumours
  • Cost and insurance coverage (mandated in only some US states)
  • Prepubertal boys have only experimental options
  • Referral gaps, especially in men, adolescents and LMICs
  • Workforce and access
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between FDG PET, Oncofertility and fertility preservation and Cardio-oncology, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (staging and risk), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: FDG-PET/CT with Lugano staging, International Prognostic Score, fertility counselling and cardiac and pulmonary baselines.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

First line, adults and adolescents 12 and over

Nivolumab with AVD for six cycles (SWOG S1826, preferred); brentuximab vedotin with AVD (ECHELON-1) as an alternative; PET-adapted ABVD with bleomycin omission after two cycles (RATHL) where antibodies are unavailable.

The options, in plain words

Nivolumab was the second PD-1 blocker and is often combined with ipilimumab. Long-term data show about half of advanced melanoma patients alive at 10 years on the combination.

The ADC that made the modern field credible (2011), for Hodgkin lymphoma and CD30+ lymphomas.

The red chemotherapy drug from a soil bacterium that is still the backbone of treatment for sarcoma, lymphoma and breast cancer, limited by cumulative heart damage.

Vinblastine is the vinca alkaloid in ABVD, the standard Hodgkin lymphoma regimen, and was formerly in the cisplatin combinations that first cured testicular cancer.

Dacarbazine is an older chemotherapy infusion. It was the standard treatment for advanced melanoma for decades and is the D in the ABVD regimen that cures most Hodgkin lymphoma.

The evidence behind it
  • Untreated stage III-IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma, age ≥12: nivolumab + AVD vs brentuximab vedotin + AVD
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • 2-year PFS 92% vs 83%, HR 0.45.
    Progression-free survival at 2 years (%): Nivolumab-AVD 92 (n=489) vs BV-AVD 83 (n=487) · HR 0.45 · source
  • Untreated stage III-IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma: brentuximab vedotin + AVD vs ABVD
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • 6-year OS 93.9% vs 89.4%, HR 0.59.
    Modified PFS at 2 years (%): BV-AVD 82.1 vs ABVD 77.2 · HR 0.77 · source
  • Advanced Hodgkin lymphoma: interim-PET-guided omission of bleomycin (AVD) vs continued ABVD
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • 3-year PFS 85.7% (ABVD) vs 84.4% (AVD); bleomycin safely omitted.
    Progression-free survival at 3 years (PET2-negative) (%): ABVD 85.7 (n=470) vs AVD 84.4 (n=465) · source
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Colitis with ipilimumab (1+3 mg/kg) · Monotherapy pooled unless stated25%14.4%
Hepatitis with ipilimumab · Monotherapy pooled unless stated15%13.4%
Colitis · Monotherapy pooled unless stated2.9%1.7%
Hepatitis · Monotherapy pooled unless stated1.8%1.5%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm91%82%
Febrile neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm19%19%
Peripheral sensory neuropathy · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm65%10%
Vomiting · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm33%3%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Cumulative dose: risk rises steeply above 400-550 mg/m² (see the anthracycline calculator).
  • Reduce by 50% for bilirubin 20-50 µmol/L and 75% for 50-85 µmol/L.
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Nivolumab, Brentuximab vedotin, Doxorubicin and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in SWOG S1826 and ECHELON-1, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Nivolumab or Brentuximab vedotin are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  7. For my situation (first line, adults and adolescents 12 and over), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Nivolumab with AVD for six cycles (SWOG S1826, preferred); brentuximab vedotin with AVD (ECHELON-1) as an alternative; PET-adapted ABVD with bleomycin omission after two cycles (RATHL) where antibodies are unavailable.
  8. Am I a candidate for Nivolumab, Brentuximab vedotin, Doxorubicin or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  9. How do the results of SWOG S1826 and ECHELON-1 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

First line, intensive European option

2 options

BrECADD for four to six cycles guided by interim PET (GHSG HD21), replacing escalated BEACOPP.

The options, in plain words

The ADC that made the modern field credible (2011), for Hodgkin lymphoma and CD30+ lymphomas.

Scan after two cycles of chemotherapy; if the tumour has gone dark, give less treatment, and if not, give more. Hodgkin lymphoma pioneered this.

  • Spares most patients bleomycin, radiation or intensified chemotherapy
  • Identifies the minority who need escalation
The evidence behind it
  • Untreated advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma, age 18-60: PET-guided BrECADD vs escalated BEACOPP
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • 4-year PFS 94.3% vs 90.9%, HR 0.66; less toxicity.
    Progression-free survival at 4 years (%): BrECADD 94.3 (n=742) vs eBEACOPP 90.9 (n=740) · HR 0.66 · source
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm91%82%
Febrile neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm19%19%
Peripheral sensory neuropathy · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm65%10%
Vomiting · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm33%3%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Interim PET has imperfect positive predictive value (many PET2-positive patients are cured anyway)
  • Omitting radiotherapy trades a few percent PFS for late-toxicity avoidance
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Brentuximab vedotin and PET-adapted (response-adapted) therapy, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in GHSG HD21, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Brentuximab vedotin are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  7. For my situation (first line, intensive european option), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: BrECADD for four to six cycles guided by interim PET (GHSG HD21), replacing escalated BEACOPP.
  8. Am I a candidate for Brentuximab vedotin, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  9. How do the results of GHSG HD21 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

2 options

Response-adapted Children's Oncology Group or EuroNet regimens; brentuximab vedotin with AVD in advanced paediatric disease; radiotherapy for slow responders only.

The options, in plain words

The ADC that made the modern field credible (2011), for Hodgkin lymphoma and CD30+ lymphomas.

Scan after two cycles of chemotherapy; if the tumour has gone dark, give less treatment, and if not, give more. Hodgkin lymphoma pioneered this.

  • Spares most patients bleomycin, radiation or intensified chemotherapy
  • Identifies the minority who need escalation
The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm91%82%
Febrile neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm19%19%
Peripheral sensory neuropathy · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm65%10%
Vomiting · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm33%3%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Interim PET has imperfect positive predictive value (many PET2-positive patients are cured anyway)
  • Omitting radiotherapy trades a few percent PFS for late-toxicity avoidance
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Brentuximab vedotin and PET-adapted (response-adapted) therapy, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in A Study of Brentuximab Vedotin + Adriamycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine in Pediatric Participants With Advanced Stage Newly Diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Brentuximab vedotin are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  7. For my situation (children), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Response-adapted Children's Oncology Group or EuroNet regimens; brentuximab vedotin with AVD in advanced paediatric disease; radiotherapy for slow responders only.
  8. Am I a candidate for Brentuximab vedotin, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  9. How do the results of A Study of Brentuximab Vedotin + Adriamycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine in Pediatric Participants With Advanced Stage Newly Diagnosed Hodgkin Lymphoma apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Special situations

Older or frail patients

AVD with brentuximab vedotin sequenced before and after, or nivolumab-AVD; avoid bleomycin and BEACOPP.

The options, in plain words

The ADC that made the modern field credible (2011), for Hodgkin lymphoma and CD30+ lymphomas.

Nivolumab was the second PD-1 blocker and is often combined with ipilimumab. Long-term data show about half of advanced melanoma patients alive at 10 years on the combination.

The red chemotherapy drug from a soil bacterium that is still the backbone of treatment for sarcoma, lymphoma and breast cancer, limited by cumulative heart damage.

Cardio-oncologyEstablished

Cardio-oncology builds heart risk assessment, monitoring and prevention into cancer care so patients can finish curative treatment without trading cancer for heart failure. It targets anthracycline and trastuzumab damage, checkpoint-inhibitor myocarditis and radiation heart disease using echocardiography, troponin tests and protective drugs; specialist clinics are concentrated in large centres.

  • Enables completion of curative therapy
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm91%82%
Febrile neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm19%19%
Peripheral sensory neuropathy · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm65%10%
Vomiting · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm33%3%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Colitis with ipilimumab (1+3 mg/kg) · Monotherapy pooled unless stated25%14.4%
Hepatitis with ipilimumab · Monotherapy pooled unless stated15%13.4%
Colitis · Monotherapy pooled unless stated2.9%1.7%
Hepatitis · Monotherapy pooled unless stated1.8%1.5%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Cumulative dose: risk rises steeply above 400-550 mg/m² (see the anthracycline calculator).
  • Reduce by 50% for bilirubin 20-50 µmol/L and 75% for 50-85 µmol/L.
  • Workforce and access
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Brentuximab vedotin, Nivolumab, Doxorubicin and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Brentuximab vedotin or Nivolumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (older or frail patients), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: AVD with brentuximab vedotin sequenced before and after, or nivolumab-AVD; avoid bleomycin and BEACOPP.
  7. Am I a candidate for Brentuximab vedotin, Nivolumab, Doxorubicin, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Other settings

End of treatment

2 options

PET-directed consolidation radiotherapy only for residual PET-positive bulky disease; long-term survivorship follow-up.

The options, in plain words
FDG PETStandard of care

FDG PET is the standard PET scan. A radioactive sugar shows which tissues are burning glucose fast, which most cancers do.

  • Universal availability
  • Decades of validation

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Non-specific: infection and inflammation are also hot
  • Brain background
  • Poor in indolent tumours
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between FDG PET and IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (end of treatment), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: PET-directed consolidation radiotherapy only for residual PET-positive bulky disease; long-term survivorship follow-up.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.