OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the decisions you may face

5 treatment settings, 4 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Early / localised

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Modified FOLFIRINOX for two to four months in fit patients, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel otherwise; restage with CT and CA 19-9 before deciding on surgery (PREOPANC, ESPAC-5).

The options, in plain words

FOLFIRINOX is a four-drug chemotherapy combination that, in 2011, became the first treatment to meaningfully extend life in metastatic pancreatic cancer; it is now the standard before and after surgery.

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is the gentler of the two standard chemotherapy backbones for pancreatic cancer, and the base on which most new drugs are being tested.

The evidence behind it
  • Resectable and borderline-resectable PDAC: neoadjuvant chemoradiation (PREOPANC-1) or neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX (PREOPANC-2) vs upfront surgery
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • PREOPANC-1 5-year OS 20.5% vs 6.5%; PREOPANC-2 no OS benefit.
    Overall survival (long-term) (%): Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 5-year OS 20.5 (n=119) vs Upfront surgery, 5-year OS 6.5 (n=127) · HR 0.73 · source
The main trade-offs on record

No side-effect rates or interaction flags are recorded for these options yet. The side-effect lookup and interaction checker cover the products that have them.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between FOLFIRINOX / mFOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in PREOPANC-1 / PREOPANC-2, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (neoadjuvant chemotherapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Modified FOLFIRINOX for two to four months in fit patients, gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel otherwise; restage with CT and CA 19-9 before deciding on surgery (PREOPANC, ESPAC-5).
  7. Am I a candidate for FOLFIRINOX / mFOLFIRINOX, Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  8. How do the results of PREOPANC-1 / PREOPANC-2 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

Radiotherapy after chemotherapy

3 options

Optional; conventional chemoradiation or stereotactic radiotherapy to secure an arterial margin in selected patients, with ALLIANCE A021501 as the caution against routine use.

The options, in plain words

Stereotactic body radiotherapy converges multiple beams with sub-millimetre accuracy to deliver tumour-destroying doses in one to five outpatient sessions, doing the job of surgery for inoperable early lung cancer and for metastases in liver, spine and brain. Tumour size and location limit its use, and late toxicity is a concern near the central airways.

  • Ablative doses with minimal recovery
  • Outpatient

An MR-linac is a radiation machine with an MRI scanner built in, so images taken during setup let the plan be re-optimised in minutes to that day's anatomy. It allows tighter margins and higher doses in pancreatic and prostate cancer, but treatment is slow and costly, and whether daily adaptation improves cure rates rather than only toxicity is unproven.

  • Tighter margins, dose escalation in pancreas

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a tablet form of the chemotherapy fluorouracil. It is a backbone of treatment for bowel cancer and a standard option in advanced breast cancer.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Size and location limits
  • Late toxicity near central airways
  • Slow throughput
  • Cost
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between SBRT / SABR (stereotactic radiotherapy), MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy and Capecitabine, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (radiotherapy after chemotherapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Optional; conventional chemoradiation or stereotactic radiotherapy to secure an arterial margin in selected patients, with ALLIANCE A021501 as the caution against routine use.
  6. Am I a candidate for Capecitabine, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

One path named

Pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy with venous resection and reconstruction where needed, arterial resection only in specialist centres; proceed on stable or improved disease with falling CA 19-9.

The path, in plain words

Surgeons operate through small incisions using robotic arms with tremor-free precision and 3D vision.

  • Precision, shorter stay
  • Enables complex minimally invasive resections
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cost
  • Loss of haptic feedback
  • Not superior for every indication
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Robotic & minimally invasive surgery the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (surgery), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy with venous resection and reconstruction where needed, arterial resection only in specialist centres; proceed on stable or improved disease with falling CA 19-9.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Complete six months of chemotherapy in total, usually with the regimen the tumour responded to.

The options, in plain words

FOLFIRINOX is a four-drug chemotherapy combination that, in 2011, became the first treatment to meaningfully extend life in metastatic pancreatic cancer; it is now the standard before and after surgery.

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is the gentler of the two standard chemotherapy backbones for pancreatic cancer, and the base on which most new drugs are being tested.

A versatile chemotherapy used in pancreatic, bladder, lung, ovarian, breast and biliary cancers, in nasopharyngeal cancer, and as a bladder instillation.

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a tablet form of the chemotherapy fluorouracil. It is a backbone of treatment for bowel cancer and a standard option in advanced breast cancer.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record

No side-effect rates or interaction flags are recorded for these options yet. The side-effect lookup and interaction checker cover the products that have them.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between FOLFIRINOX / mFOLFIRINOX, Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, Gemcitabine and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (after surgery), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Complete six months of chemotherapy in total, usually with the regimen the tumour responded to.
  6. Am I a candidate for FOLFIRINOX / mFOLFIRINOX, Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, Gemcitabine or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

Progression during neoadjuvant therapy

Manage as locally advanced or metastatic disease; switch chemotherapy backbone, RAS inhibitor trials, biliary stenting for jaundice.

The options, in plain words

NALIRIFOX is a version of FOLFIRINOX using a liposome-wrapped irinotecan, approved in 2024 as a first-line option for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

The first drug that blocks all active RAS variants, approved by the FDA in August 2026 for metastatic pancreatic cancer, where KRAS drives 90% of tumours.

A small tube placed by endoscope or through the skin reopens a blocked bile duct, relieving jaundice so chemotherapy can be given.

  • Rapid symptom relief
  • Enables chemotherapy dosing
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cholangitis and stent occlusion
  • Pre-operative drainage is debated for resectable disease
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan + oxaliplatin + 5-FU/LV), Daraxonrasib and Biliary stenting and drainage, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (progression during neoadjuvant therapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Manage as locally advanced or metastatic disease; switch chemotherapy backbone, RAS inhibitor trials, biliary stenting for jaundice.
  6. Am I a candidate for NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan + oxaliplatin + 5-FU/LV), Daraxonrasib, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.