OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Central nervous system germ cell tumours: the decisions you may face

5 treatment settings, 4 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Early / localised

Localised germinoma

Platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin and etoposide, with ifosfamide in the SIOP schedule) followed by reduced-dose whole-ventricular irradiation with a tumour boost (SIOP CNS GCT II, ACNS1123); craniospinal irradiation alone remains an alternative in adults.

The options, in plain words

Carboplatin is a platinum chemotherapy that crosslinks DNA; it is part of the standard pre-surgery regimen for triple-negative breast cancer.

Etoposide is a chemotherapy from the mayapple plant, essential to curing testicular cancer (BEP), treating small-cell lung cancer, lymphomas, childhood sarcomas and leukaemias, and used in transplant conditioning.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating chemotherapy partnered with doxorubicin in sarcoma and with etoposide in Ewing sarcoma, given with a bladder-protecting drug.

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits
Proton therapyEstablished

Radiation using protons, which stop inside the tumour instead of passing through, so tissue behind it gets no dose.

  • No exit dose; lower integral dose
  • Reduced second cancers in children
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Dose by Calvert formula using GFR (see the calculators).
  • Reduce to 75% for CrCl 15-50.
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Cost
  • Range uncertainty
  • Limited randomised evidence in adults
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Carboplatin, Etoposide, Ifosfamide and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCI PDQ: childhood CNS germ cell tumours), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (localised germinoma), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Platinum-based chemotherapy (carboplatin and etoposide, with ifosfamide in the SIOP schedule) followed by reduced-dose whole-ventricular irradiation with a tumour boost (SIOP CNS GCT II, ACNS1123); craniospinal irradiation alone remains an alternative in adults.
  6. Am I a candidate for Carboplatin, Etoposide, Ifosfamide, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

Disseminated germinoma

2 options

Craniospinal irradiation with boosts, with or without chemotherapy.

The options, in plain words

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits
Proton therapyEstablished

Radiation using protons, which stop inside the tumour instead of passing through, so tissue behind it gets no dose.

  • No exit dose; lower integral dose
  • Reduced second cancers in children
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Cost
  • Range uncertainty
  • Limited randomised evidence in adults
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam) and Proton therapy, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCI PDQ: childhood CNS germ cell tumours), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (disseminated germinoma), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Craniospinal irradiation with boosts, with or without chemotherapy.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Other settings

Non-germinomatous germ cell tumour

Intensive cisplatin or carboplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide chemotherapy, second-look surgery for residual disease, then craniospinal or whole-ventricular irradiation depending on stage and response (ACNS0122, ACNS1123, SIOP CNS GCT II).

The options, in plain words

Cisplatin is the original platinum chemotherapy, discovered by accident in 1965; it cures testicular cancer and makes radiation work better in cervical and head and neck cancer.

Carboplatin is a platinum chemotherapy that crosslinks DNA; it is part of the standard pre-surgery regimen for triple-negative breast cancer.

Etoposide is a chemotherapy from the mayapple plant, essential to curing testicular cancer (BEP), treating small-cell lung cancer, lymphomas, childhood sarcomas and leukaemias, and used in transplant conditioning.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating chemotherapy partnered with doxorubicin in sarcoma and with etoposide in Ewing sarcoma, given with a bladder-protecting drug.

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits
Proton therapyEstablished

Radiation using protons, which stop inside the tumour instead of passing through, so tissue behind it gets no dose.

  • No exit dose; lower integral dose
  • Reduced second cancers in children
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Dose reduce or avoid for CrCl below 60 (carboplatin is the alternative).
  • Dose by Calvert formula using GFR (see the calculators).
  • Reduce to 75% for CrCl 15-50.
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Cost
  • Range uncertainty
  • Limited randomised evidence in adults
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Etoposide and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCI PDQ: childhood CNS germ cell tumours), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (non-germinomatous germ cell tumour), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Intensive cisplatin or carboplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide chemotherapy, second-look surgery for residual disease, then craniospinal or whole-ventricular irradiation depending on stage and response (ACNS0122, ACNS1123, SIOP CNS GCT II).
  6. Am I a candidate for Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Etoposide or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

One path named

Complete surgical resection; growing teratoma after chemotherapy is also managed surgically.

The path, in plain words
MRIStandard of care

MRI uses a strong magnet and radio waves, with no ionising radiation, to picture soft tissue in finer contrast than CT, so it is the standard scan for brain tumours, prostate, rectal cancer staging, liver lesions and breast screening in high-risk women. It is slow, expensive and blurred by movement.

  • No ionising radiation
  • Best soft-tissue and brain imaging
  • Functional sequences (diffusion, perfusion)
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Slow and expensive
  • Motion artefacts
  • Gadolinium concerns in renal impairment
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is MRI the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. For my situation (teratoma), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Complete surgical resection; growing teratoma after chemotherapy is also managed surgically.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

2 options

High-dose chemotherapy (thiotepa-based) with autologous stem cell rescue, with re-irradiation where possible.

The options, in plain words

Thiotepa is an old chemotherapy with a modern job: at high doses it prepares patients for stem cell transplants, and it is still instilled into the bladder or body cavities for superficial bladder cancer and malignant effusions.

Autologous stem cell transplant collects the patient's own blood-forming stem cells, gives melphalan or another chemotherapy at a dose that would otherwise destroy the marrow, then returns the cells to rebuild it. It is standard consolidation in myeloma and for relapsed lymphoma, though CAR-T has displaced it in early-relapsing large B-cell lymphoma.

  • Permits dose intensity impossible otherwise
  • Decades of outcome data
  • Widely available
Also referenced:Re-irradiation
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Treatment-related mortality ~1-2% (myeloma) to higher in children
  • Infertility, second malignancies, prolonged cytopenias
  • Being challenged by CAR-T and MRD-guided deferral
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Thiotepa and Autologous stem cell transplant (high-dose therapy), which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. For my situation (relapse), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: High-dose chemotherapy (thiotepa-based) with autologous stem cell rescue, with re-irradiation where possible.
  5. Am I a candidate for Thiotepa, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.