OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the decisions you may face

7 treatment settings, 4 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

3 options

MRI with cholangiography and CT for staging, endoscopic brushing or biopsy, and biliary drainage by stent or percutaneous route with antibiotics for cholangitis.

The options, in plain words
MRIStandard of care

MRI uses a strong magnet and radio waves, with no ionising radiation, to picture soft tissue in finer contrast than CT, so it is the standard scan for brain tumours, prostate, rectal cancer staging, liver lesions and breast screening in high-risk women. It is slow, expensive and blurred by movement.

  • No ionising radiation
  • Best soft-tissue and brain imaging
  • Functional sequences (diffusion, perfusion)
CT (computed tomography)Standard of care

A CT scan is a fast 3D X-ray that shows the size and shape of tumours and whether they have spread.

  • Fast, ubiquitous
  • Sub-millimetre resolution
  • Standard for RECIST response

A small tube placed by endoscope or through the skin reopens a blocked bile duct, relieving jaundice so chemotherapy can be given.

  • Rapid symptom relief
  • Enables chemotherapy dosing
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Slow and expensive
  • Motion artefacts
  • Gadolinium concerns in renal impairment
  • Anatomic only; cannot distinguish scar from live tumour
  • Radiation dose
  • Poor for brain, marrow, and small peritoneal disease
  • Cholangitis and stent occlusion
  • Pre-operative drainage is debated for resectable disease
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between MRI, CT (computed tomography) and Biliary stenting and drainage, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. For my situation (diagnosis and jaundice), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: MRI with cholangiography and CT for staging, endoscopic brushing or biopsy, and biliary drainage by stent or percutaneous route with antibiotics for cholangitis.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Early / localised

Resectable perihilar

One path named

Bile duct resection with hemihepatectomy and caudate lobectomy after portal vein embolisation and drainage where needed, then six months of capecitabine (BILCAP).

The path, in plain words

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a tablet form of the chemotherapy fluorouracil. It is a backbone of treatment for bowel cancer and a standard option in advanced breast cancer.

The evidence behind it
  • Adjuvant capecitabine for 6 months vs observation after resection of biliary tract cancer

    OS 51.1 vs 36.4 months; ITT HR 0.81 (p=0.097), per-protocol HR 0.75.

    Overall survival (ITT) (months): Capecitabine 51.1 (n=223) vs Observation 36.4 (n=224) · HR 0.81 · source
The main trade-offs on record

No side-effect rates or interaction flags are recorded for these options yet. The side-effect lookup and interaction checker cover the products that have them.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Capecitabine the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in BILCAP, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (resectable perihilar), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Bile duct resection with hemihepatectomy and caudate lobectomy after portal vein embolisation and drainage where needed, then six months of capecitabine (BILCAP).
  6. Am I a candidate for Capecitabine, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  7. How do the results of BILCAP apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Early / localised

Resectable distal

One path named

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) with lymphadenectomy, then adjuvant capecitabine.

The path, in plain words

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a tablet form of the chemotherapy fluorouracil. It is a backbone of treatment for bowel cancer and a standard option in advanced breast cancer.

The evidence behind it
  • Adjuvant capecitabine for 6 months vs observation after resection of biliary tract cancer

    OS 51.1 vs 36.4 months; ITT HR 0.81 (p=0.097), per-protocol HR 0.75.

    Overall survival (ITT) (months): Capecitabine 51.1 (n=223) vs Observation 36.4 (n=224) · HR 0.81 · source
The main trade-offs on record

No side-effect rates or interaction flags are recorded for these options yet. The side-effect lookup and interaction checker cover the products that have them.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Capecitabine the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in BILCAP, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (resectable distal), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) with lymphadenectomy, then adjuvant capecitabine.
  6. Am I a candidate for Capecitabine, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  7. How do the results of BILCAP apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

Unresectable perihilar, selected

One path named

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by liver transplantation under the Mayo protocol in specialist centres.

The path, in plain words

Replacing the whole diseased liver cures both the cancer and the cirrhosis underneath it, for patients whose tumours are small enough.

  • Only therapy that treats cancer and cirrhosis together
  • Best long-term survival for early HCC
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Organ shortage and waiting-list dropout
  • Lifelong immunosuppression; checkpoint inhibitors before transplant risk rejection
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Liver transplantation for cancer (Milan criteria and beyond) the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. For my situation (unresectable perihilar, selected), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by liver transplantation under the Mayo protocol in specialist centres.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin with durvalumab (TOPAZ-1) or pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-966).

The options, in plain words

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin has been the chemotherapy backbone for bile duct cancer since 2010 and is now given with immunotherapy.

A PD-L1 blocker that became standard after chemoradiation for stage III lung cancer, and now in bladder, biliary, and gastric cancers.

Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody approved in more than 40 settings, from melanoma and lung cancer to the first tumour-agnostic approval for mismatch-repair-deficient tumours in 2017, and before and after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer. A subcutaneous form arrived in 2025, and it is the backbone partner for ADCs and personalised neoantigen vaccines.

The evidence behind it
  • First-line advanced biliary tract cancer: gemcitabine-cisplatin + durvalumab vs + placebo
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • OS HR 0.76; 2-year OS 23.6% vs 11.5%.
    Overall survival (updated) (months): Durvalumab + GemCis 12.9 (n=341) vs Placebo + GemCis 11.3 (n=344) · HR 0.76 · source
  • First-line advanced biliary tract cancer: gemcitabine-cisplatin + pembrolizumab vs + placebo

    OS 12.7 vs 10.9 months, HR 0.83.

    Overall survival (months): Pembrolizumab + GemCis 12.7 (n=533) vs Placebo + GemCis 10.9 (n=536) · HR 0.83 · source
  • Locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: gemcitabine + cisplatin vs gemcitabine

    OS 11.7 vs 8.1 months, HR 0.64.

    Overall survival (months): Gemcitabine + cisplatin 11.7 (n=204) vs Gemcitabine 8.1 (n=206) · HR 0.64 · source
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Pneumonitis (any cause, PACIFIC) · vs 12.8% placebo; 1.1% fatal18.3%-

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hypothyroidism (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients8%-
Pneumonitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients3.4%-
Colitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients1.7%-
Hepatitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients0.7%-
  • No pharmacokinetic interactions expected (antibody). See the irAE guide for toxicity management.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Gemcitabine + cisplatin, Durvalumab and Pembrolizumab, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Durvalumab or Pembrolizumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. For my situation (advanced, first line), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Gemcitabine and cisplatin with durvalumab (TOPAZ-1) or pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-966).
  7. Am I a candidate for Gemcitabine + cisplatin, Durvalumab, Pembrolizumab, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  8. How do the results of TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

Advanced, HER2-positive after chemotherapy

Zanidatamab (HERIZON-BTC-01) or trastuzumab deruxtecan; zanidatamab first line in HERIZON-BTC-302.

The options, in plain words

Zanidatamab (Ziihera) is an antibody that grabs HER2 at two different spots, approved for HER2+ bile duct cancer.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu) is the most successful ADC ever. It redefined HER2 by working in tumours with only tiny amounts of the protein, and in 2026 moved into early-stage breast cancer.

Also referenced:HER2
The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Neutropenia · DESTINY-Breast03/04; all-grade rates ≥20% per label-18%
Nausea · DESTINY-Breast03/04; all-grade rates ≥20% per label-7%
Anaemia · DESTINY-Breast03/04; all-grade rates ≥20% per label-7%
Fatigue · DESTINY-Breast03/04; all-grade rates ≥20% per label-6%
  • Interstitial lung disease in 10-15%: hold for any respiratory symptom and image; permanently discontinue for grade 2 or above. Moderately emetogenic: three-drug prophylaxis.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Zanidatamab and Trastuzumab deruxtecan, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in HERIZON-BTC-302, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Trastuzumab deruxtecan are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. For my situation (advanced, her2-positive after chemotherapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Zanidatamab (HERIZON-BTC-01) or trastuzumab deruxtecan; zanidatamab first line in HERIZON-BTC-302.
  7. Am I a candidate for Zanidatamab, Trastuzumab deruxtecan, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  8. How do the results of HERIZON-BTC-302 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

Second line without a target

FOLFOX (ABC-06); pembrolizumab for microsatellite-unstable tumours, dabrafenib-trametinib for BRAF V600E.

The options, in plain words

FOLFOX is the workhorse chemotherapy combination for bowel cancer, used after surgery to cure and in advanced disease as the backbone that targeted drugs are added to.

Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody approved in more than 40 settings, from melanoma and lung cancer to the first tumour-agnostic approval for mismatch-repair-deficient tumours in 2017, and before and after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer. A subcutaneous form arrived in 2025, and it is the backbone partner for ADCs and personalised neoantigen vaccines.

Dabrafenib plus trametinib is the BRAF-plus-MEK pill combination, approved for BRAF V600E lung cancer and, since 2022, for any solid tumour with that mutation.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hypothyroidism (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients8%-
Pneumonitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients3.4%-
Colitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients1.7%-
Hepatitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients0.7%-
  • No pharmacokinetic interactions expected (antibody). See the irAE guide for toxicity management.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Dabrafenib: take on an empty stomach. Trametinib: take on an empty stomach; both cause pyrexia.
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin), Pembrolizumab and Dabrafenib + trametinib, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Pembrolizumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (second line without a target), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: FOLFOX (ABC-06); pembrolizumab for microsatellite-unstable tumours, dabrafenib-trametinib for BRAF V600E.
  6. Am I a candidate for FOLFOX (5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin), Pembrolizumab, Dabrafenib + trametinib, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.