OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

KRAS G12C-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: the decisions you may face

3 treatment settings, 3 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

As for driver-negative disease: pembrolizumab plus platinum doublet, or pembrolizumab alone if PD-L1 is 50 percent or more; KRAS inhibitors are not yet approved first line.

The options, in plain words

Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody approved in more than 40 settings, from melanoma and lung cancer to the first tumour-agnostic approval for mismatch-repair-deficient tumours in 2017, and before and after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer. A subcutaneous form arrived in 2025, and it is the backbone partner for ADCs and personalised neoantigen vaccines.

Carboplatin is a platinum chemotherapy that crosslinks DNA; it is part of the standard pre-surgery regimen for triple-negative breast cancer.

Pemetrexed is the chemotherapy that, with a platinum drug, became the first approved treatment for mesothelioma in 2004, and is still the backbone today.

A microtubule poison discovered in the Pacific yew tree, among the most used chemotherapies in breast, lung, and ovarian cancer.

The evidence behind it
  • First-line metastatic NSCLC without EGFR/ALK: pembrolizumab alone (PD-L1 TPS ≥50%, KEYNOTE-024) or pembrolizumab + platinum-pemetrexed (any PD-L1, non-squamous, KEYNOTE-189)
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • 5-year OS 31.9% vs 16.3% (024); 19.4% vs 11.3% (189).
    KEYNOTE-024: overall survival at 5 years, PD-L1 ≥50% (%): Pembrolizumab 31.9 (n=154) vs Chemotherapy 16.3 (n=151) · HR 0.62 · source
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hypothyroidism (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients8%-
Pneumonitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients3.4%-
Colitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients1.7%-
Hepatitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients0.7%-
  • No pharmacokinetic interactions expected (antibody). See the irAE guide for toxicity management.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Dose by Calvert formula using GFR (see the calculators).
  • Not recommended for CrCl below 45.
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Pembrolizumab, Carboplatin, Pemetrexed and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in KEYNOTE-024 & KEYNOTE-189, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Pembrolizumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  7. For my situation (advanced, first line), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: As for driver-negative disease: pembrolizumab plus platinum doublet, or pembrolizumab alone if PD-L1 is 50 percent or more; KRAS inhibitors are not yet approved first line.
  8. Am I a candidate for Pembrolizumab, Carboplatin, Pemetrexed or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  9. How do the results of KEYNOTE-024 & KEYNOTE-189 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

Advanced, after chemoimmunotherapy

Sotorasib (CodeBreaK 200) or adagrasib (KRYSTAL-12), preferred to docetaxel; adagrasib for active brain metastases; docetaxel with or without ramucirumab afterwards.

The options, in plain words

Sotorasib (Lumakras) was the first drug to hit KRAS, approved in 2021 after four decades of failure.

Adagrasib was the second KRAS G12C inhibitor, with a long half-life and brain penetration, and is approved in lung and colorectal cancer.

The first chemotherapy to extend life in prostate cancer (2004), now part of triplet therapy at first metastatic diagnosis.

An antibody that blocks the VEGF receptor, approved in liver cancer only for patients with a high AFP blood level, the first biomarker-selected HCC drug.

Drugs against the most common cancer gene, considered impossible to target until sotorasib in 2021.

  • First drugs for a 40-year-old target
The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hepatotoxicity · CodeBreaK 10025%12%
Interstitial lung disease · CodeBreaK 1002.2%1.1%
Diarrhoea · CodeBreaK 10042%-
Musculoskeletal pain · CodeBreaK 10035%-
  • No adjustment for mild impairment; hepatotoxicity is common and worse after recent immunotherapy.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hepatotoxicity · KRYSTAL-1 NSCLC37%10%
Dyspnoea · KRYSTAL-1 NSCLC35%10%
Fatigue · KRYSTAL-1 NSCLC59%7%
Musculoskeletal pain · KRYSTAL-1 NSCLC41%7%
  • Known QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Do not give if bilirubin above ULN, or AST/ALT above 1.5 x ULN with alkaline phosphatase above 2.5 x ULN (treatment-related deaths).
  • Modest durability as monotherapy
  • Adaptive RTK feedback requires combinations
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Sotorasib, Adagrasib, Docetaxel and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in CodeBreaK 200 and KRYSTAL-12, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Sotorasib or Adagrasib are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  7. For my situation (advanced, after chemoimmunotherapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Sotorasib (CodeBreaK 200) or adagrasib (KRYSTAL-12), preferred to docetaxel; adagrasib for active brain metastases; docetaxel with or without ramucirumab afterwards.
  8. Am I a candidate for Sotorasib, Adagrasib, Docetaxel or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  9. How do the results of CodeBreaK 200 and KRYSTAL-12 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

Advanced, clinical trials

Divarasib versus sotorasib or adagrasib (Krascendo 1); olomorasib or adagrasib with pembrolizumab first line (SUNRAY-01, KRYSTAL-7); pan-RAS inhibitors.

The options, in plain words

Divarasib is Roche's KRAS G12C pill, the first to beat the two approved KRAS drugs head-to-head (July 2026).

Olomorasib is Lilly's KRAS G12C pill, designed to combine safely with immunotherapy in first-line lung cancer.

The first drug that blocks all active RAS variants, approved by the FDA in August 2026 for metastatic pancreatic cancer, where KRAS drives 90% of tumours.

The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record

No side-effect rates or interaction flags are recorded for these options yet. The side-effect lookup and interaction checker cover the products that have them.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Divarasib, Olomorasib and Daraxonrasib, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in Krascendo 1 and A Study of First-Line Olomorasib (LY3537982) and Pembrolizumab With or Without Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (advanced, clinical trials), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Divarasib versus sotorasib or adagrasib (Krascendo 1); olomorasib or adagrasib with pembrolizumab first line (SUNRAY-01, KRYSTAL-7); pan-RAS inhibitors.
  7. Am I a candidate for Divarasib, Olomorasib, Daraxonrasib, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  8. How do the results of Krascendo 1 and A Study of First-Line Olomorasib (LY3537982) and Pembrolizumab With or Without Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced KRAS G12C-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.