OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

KRAS G12C-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the decisions you may face

3 treatment settings, 3 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Chemotherapy as for other pancreatic adenocarcinoma: modified FOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel; G12C inhibitors are not approved first line.

The options, in plain words

FOLFIRINOX is a four-drug chemotherapy combination that, in 2011, became the first treatment to meaningfully extend life in metastatic pancreatic cancer; it is now the standard before and after surgery.

NALIRIFOX is a version of FOLFIRINOX using a liposome-wrapped irinotecan, approved in 2024 as a first-line option for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is the gentler of the two standard chemotherapy backbones for pancreatic cancer, and the base on which most new drugs are being tested.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record

No side-effect rates or interaction flags are recorded for these options yet. The side-effect lookup and interaction checker cover the products that have them.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between FOLFIRINOX / mFOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan + oxaliplatin + 5-FU/LV) and Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (first line), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Chemotherapy as for other pancreatic adenocarcinoma: modified FOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel; G12C inhibitors are not approved first line.
  6. Am I a candidate for FOLFIRINOX / mFOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX (liposomal irinotecan + oxaliplatin + 5-FU/LV), Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

After first-line chemotherapy

Daraxonrasib (RASolute 302, approved for pancreatic cancer irrespective of KRAS subtype); sotorasib or adagrasib as NCCN-listed options on the CodeBreaK 100 and KRYSTAL-1 cohorts.

The options, in plain words

The first drug that blocks all active RAS variants, approved by the FDA in August 2026 for metastatic pancreatic cancer, where KRAS drives 90% of tumours.

Sotorasib (Lumakras) was the first drug to hit KRAS, approved in 2021 after four decades of failure.

Adagrasib was the second KRAS G12C inhibitor, with a long half-life and brain penetration, and is approved in lung and colorectal cancer.

Drugs against the most common cancer gene, considered impossible to target until sotorasib in 2021.

  • First drugs for a 40-year-old target
The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hepatotoxicity · CodeBreaK 10025%12%
Interstitial lung disease · CodeBreaK 1002.2%1.1%
Diarrhoea · CodeBreaK 10042%-
Musculoskeletal pain · CodeBreaK 10035%-
  • No adjustment for mild impairment; hepatotoxicity is common and worse after recent immunotherapy.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hepatotoxicity · KRYSTAL-1 NSCLC37%10%
Dyspnoea · KRYSTAL-1 NSCLC35%10%
Fatigue · KRYSTAL-1 NSCLC59%7%
Musculoskeletal pain · KRYSTAL-1 NSCLC41%7%
  • Known QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Modest durability as monotherapy
  • Adaptive RTK feedback requires combinations
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Daraxonrasib, Sotorasib, Adagrasib and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in RASolute 302, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Sotorasib or Adagrasib are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  7. For my situation (after first-line chemotherapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Daraxonrasib (RASolute 302, approved for pancreatic cancer irrespective of KRAS subtype); sotorasib or adagrasib as NCCN-listed options on the CodeBreaK 100 and KRYSTAL-1 cohorts.
  8. Am I a candidate for Daraxonrasib, Sotorasib, Adagrasib, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  9. How do the results of RASolute 302 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Elironrasib with daraxonrasib, olomorasib, glecirasib and other G12C-selective inhibitors alone or with chemotherapy or EGFR antibodies.

The options, in plain words

A next-generation KRAS G12C drug that hits the active form of the protein, from the same company as daraxonrasib.

Olomorasib is Lilly's KRAS G12C pill, designed to combine safely with immunotherapy in first-line lung cancer.

Glecirasib is Jacobio's KRAS G12C inhibitor, approved in China in 2024 for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer with that mutation, and in a phase 3 trial against docetaxel.

The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record

No side-effect rates or interaction flags are recorded for these options yet. The side-effect lookup and interaction checker cover the products that have them.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Elironrasib, Olomorasib and Glecirasib, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in Study of Elironrasib and Daraxonrasib as Monotherapies and Combination Therapy in Participants With Advanced KRAS G12C Mutant Solid Tumors and Study of LY3537982 in Cancer Patients With a Specific Genetic Mutation (KRAS G12C), and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (clinical trials), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Elironrasib with daraxonrasib, olomorasib, glecirasib and other G12C-selective inhibitors alone or with chemotherapy or EGFR antibodies.
  7. Am I a candidate for Elironrasib, Olomorasib, Glecirasib, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  8. How do the results of Study of Elironrasib and Daraxonrasib as Monotherapies and Combination Therapy in Participants With Advanced KRAS G12C Mutant Solid Tumors and Study of LY3537982 in Cancer Patients With a Specific Genetic Mutation (KRAS G12C) apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.