OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

WNT-activated medulloblastoma: the decisions you may face

4 treatment settings, 3 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Advanced, first line

Non-metastatic, standard therapy

Maximal safe resection, 23.4 Gy craniospinal radiotherapy with tumour-bed boost (protons where available), then cisplatin, vincristine and cyclophosphamide or lomustine.

The options, in plain words
Proton therapyEstablished

Radiation using protons, which stop inside the tumour instead of passing through, so tissue behind it gets no dose.

  • No exit dose; lower integral dose
  • Reduced second cancers in children

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits

Cisplatin is the original platinum chemotherapy, discovered by accident in 1965; it cures testicular cancer and makes radiation work better in cervical and head and neck cancer.

A plant-derived chemotherapy from the Madagascar periwinkle that has been in almost every childhood leukaemia and lymphoma regimen since the 1960s.

Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating chemotherapy that damages DNA in dividing cells. It is part of CHOP for lymphoma, AC for breast cancer and VAC for childhood sarcomas, clears lymphocytes before CAR-T and prevents graft-versus-host disease after transplant; bladder bleeding, infertility and secondary leukaemia are its harms.

An old chemotherapy pill used when glioblastoma comes back, and the control arm most new glioblastoma drugs must beat.

Reading chemical tags on DNA that reveal a cell's identity, used to classify brain tumours and to detect cancer in blood.

  • Cell-of-origin memory
  • Stable analyte in blood
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cost
  • Range uncertainty
  • Limited randomised evidence in adults
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Dose reduce or avoid for CrCl below 60 (carboplatin is the alternative).
  • Fatal if given intrathecally: label all syringes.
  • Reference cohort dependence
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Proton therapy, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), Cisplatin and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCI PDQ: Childhood Medulloblastoma and Other CNS Embryonal Tumors Treatment (health professional version)), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (non-metastatic, standard therapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Maximal safe resection, 23.4 Gy craniospinal radiotherapy with tumour-bed boost (protons where available), then cisplatin, vincristine and cyclophosphamide or lomustine.
  6. Am I a candidate for Cisplatin, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

Non-metastatic, de-escalation trials

15 Gy (SJMB12) or 18 Gy (ACNS1422) craniospinal radiotherapy with reduced boost and fewer chemotherapy cycles, judged against historical survival.

The options, in plain words
Proton therapyEstablished

Radiation using protons, which stop inside the tumour instead of passing through, so tissue behind it gets no dose.

  • No exit dose; lower integral dose
  • Reduced second cancers in children

Cisplatin is the original platinum chemotherapy, discovered by accident in 1965; it cures testicular cancer and makes radiation work better in cervical and head and neck cancer.

A plant-derived chemotherapy from the Madagascar periwinkle that has been in almost every childhood leukaemia and lymphoma regimen since the 1960s.

Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating chemotherapy that damages DNA in dividing cells. It is part of CHOP for lymphoma, AC for breast cancer and VAC for childhood sarcomas, clears lymphocytes before CAR-T and prevents graft-versus-host disease after transplant; bladder bleeding, infertility and secondary leukaemia are its harms.

Reading chemical tags on DNA that reveal a cell's identity, used to classify brain tumours and to detect cancer in blood.

  • Cell-of-origin memory
  • Stable analyte in blood
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cost
  • Range uncertainty
  • Limited randomised evidence in adults
  • Dose reduce or avoid for CrCl below 60 (carboplatin is the alternative).
  • Fatal if given intrathecally: label all syringes.
  • Reference cohort dependence
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Proton therapy, Cisplatin, Vincristine and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCI PDQ: Childhood Medulloblastoma and Other CNS Embryonal Tumors Treatment (health professional version)), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (non-metastatic, de-escalation trials), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: 15 Gy (SJMB12) or 18 Gy (ACNS1422) craniospinal radiotherapy with reduced boost and fewer chemotherapy cycles, judged against historical survival.
  6. Am I a candidate for Cisplatin, Vincristine, Cyclophosphamide, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Advanced, first line

Metastatic or residual disease

High-risk therapy: 36 Gy craniospinal radiotherapy with boost and intensified chemotherapy, as for other groups.

The options, in plain words

Carboplatin is a platinum chemotherapy that crosslinks DNA; it is part of the standard pre-surgery regimen for triple-negative breast cancer.

Cisplatin is the original platinum chemotherapy, discovered by accident in 1965; it cures testicular cancer and makes radiation work better in cervical and head and neck cancer.

Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating chemotherapy that damages DNA in dividing cells. It is part of CHOP for lymphoma, AC for breast cancer and VAC for childhood sarcomas, clears lymphocytes before CAR-T and prevents graft-versus-host disease after transplant; bladder bleeding, infertility and secondary leukaemia are its harms.

A plant-derived chemotherapy from the Madagascar periwinkle that has been in almost every childhood leukaemia and lymphoma regimen since the 1960s.

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Dose by Calvert formula using GFR (see the calculators).
  • Dose reduce or avoid for CrCl below 60 (carboplatin is the alternative).
  • Fatal if given intrathecally: label all syringes.
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Carboplatin, Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCI PDQ: Childhood Medulloblastoma and Other CNS Embryonal Tumors Treatment (health professional version)), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (metastatic or residual disease), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: High-risk therapy: 36 Gy craniospinal radiotherapy with boost and intensified chemotherapy, as for other groups.
  6. Am I a candidate for Carboplatin, Cisplatin, Cyclophosphamide or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Special situations

Survivorship

One path named

Neurocognitive, audiological, endocrine and second-tumour follow-up for life.

The path, in plain words

Organised follow-up for the 18 million US and 50+ million global cancer survivors: watching for recurrence and second cancers, managing long-term side effects such as heart damage, infertility, neuropathy and fatigue, and helping people return to work and life.

  • Evidence-based screening prevents or detects late effects (e.g. breast MRI after chest radiation)
  • Nurse-led and primary-care models are as safe as specialist follow-up for low-risk survivors
  • Childhood survivor guidelines are mature and international (IGHG)
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Care plans alone do not change outcomes
  • Fragmentation between oncology and primary care
  • Adult late-effects guidelines less developed than paediatric
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Is Survivorship care and late-effects surveillance the only reasonable path for me, or is there a trial, a different sequence or a wait-and-see option?
    Why: A single standard does not mean a single choice; timing and trials are decisions too.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCI PDQ: Childhood Medulloblastoma and Other CNS Embryonal Tumors Treatment (health professional version)), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (survivorship), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Neurocognitive, audiological, endocrine and second-tumour follow-up for life.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.