EvidencePD-L1-high non-small-cell lung cancer without a driver mutation

For the first time a new drug has beaten pembrolizumab, the global first-line standard, in a randomised lung cancer trial, and it did so by combining checkpoint blockade with anti-angiogenesis in one molecule. For patients outside China nothing changes yet: the drug is not approved in the West, the trial was single-country, and survival benefit has not been shown. If confirmed in the global HARMONi-3 and HARMONi-7 trials, PD-1 x VEGF bispecifics could replace PD-1 antibodies as the immunotherapy backbone.

Adjuvant immunotherapy entered lung cancer here, and with it the question that still divides practice: whether it is better given before the operation, after it, or on both sides.

For the minority of patients whose tumours express a lot of PD-L1, a single antibody outperforms chemotherapy and is far easier to take. The word minority is the point: the same drug in the same disease at lower PD-L1 gives much less.

Most patients with newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous lung cancer that lacks a targetable mutation should receive chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab; those with PD-L1 of 50% or more may reasonably receive pembrolizumab alone. About one in five patients is alive at five years, compared with roughly one in ten with chemotherapy alone. Patients with EGFR or ALK alterations were excluded and should have targeted therapy first.

This trial is why PD-L1 is measured on every new advanced lung cancer and why a patient with a high score can start immunotherapy without chemotherapy. Together with KEYNOTE-189 for the rest of the population, it moved checkpoint inhibitors from second-line rescue to the first treatment most lung cancer patients receive.

This trial gave lung cancer its immunotherapy biomarker. The 50% PD-L1 cut-off decides today whether a patient with advanced lung cancer can start immunotherapy alone or needs chemotherapy added, and the five-year follow-up later showed long-term survivors among first-line responders.