Three countries wrote three different sets of follow-up rules for the same survivors, and the rules disagreed about who to screen, how and how often. Since 2010 this group has been settling those disagreements one organ at a time, in public, with the evidence graded and the disagreement named.
The problem the group was formed to solve is stated in each of its papers: surveillance recommendations "vary considerably" between the existing long-term follow-up guidelines, which "impedes the implementation of screening". A survivor of the same treatment could be told to have a yearly echocardiogram in one country, one every five years in another, and nothing in a third. The International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group was initiated in 2010 with the aim of establishing "a common vision and integrated strategy for the surveillance of late effects in childhood and young adult cancer survivors".
The method is consistent across topics: an international multidisciplinary panel, a systematic review of the evidence for the late effect and for the surveillance test, grading of each recommendation by the strength of the underlying evidence and the potential benefit from early detection, and transparent reporting of where the panel had to rely on consensus. Panels have run from 25 to 33 experts across as many as ten countries, often jointly with PanCare.
The published topics include cardiomyopathy surveillance (2015), breast cancer surveillance after chest radiation (2013), premature ovarian insufficiency (2016), male gonadotoxicity (2017), thyroid cancer (2018), ototoxicity (2019) and fertility preservation for female and male patients (2021), alongside recommendations on bone mineral density, central nervous system neoplasms, coronary artery disease, dexrazoxane cardioprotection, education and employment, fatigue, hepatic toxicity, hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction, mental health, metabolic syndrome, nephrotoxicity, obstetric care and pulmonary dysfunction, and anthracycline dose equivalence ratios. The group's site also lists topics still in development, among them colorectal cancer, dyslipidaemia, growth hormone treatment, neurocognitive problems, osteonecrosis, overweight and obesity, splenic dysfunction, thyroid dysfunction and underweight.
Two honest features are worth a reader's attention. The guidelines frequently conclude that the evidence is thin: the male gonadotoxicity paper states that the recommendations "reveal the paucity of high-quality evidence, highlighting the need for further targeted research". And where two screening strategies are equally unproven, the group says so rather than choosing: for thyroid cancer, "Of the two available surveillance strategies, thyroid ultrasound and neck palpation, neither was shown to be superior", so the panel produced a decision aid for a shared decision rather than a recommendation to screen.
Shares PanCareSurFup and the European survivor cohorts, Growth and final height after treatment in childhood, and growth hormone, Kidneys after cisplatin, ifosfamide, radiotherapy and nephrectomy in childhood, The pituitary, puberty and the hypothalamic axis after cranial radiotherapy in childhood and the tags rejuvenation, survivorship, paediatric, late-effects.
Shares PanCareSurFup and the European survivor cohorts, Growth and final height after treatment in childhood, and growth hormone, Kidneys after cisplatin, ifosfamide, radiotherapy and nephrectomy in childhood, Education, work and the years that were interrupted and the tags rejuvenation, survivorship, paediatric, late-effects.
Shares PanCareSurFup and the European survivor cohorts, Long-term follow-up in the United Kingdom: what a survivor is actually offered, The Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines, Knowledge reaches practice too slowly and the tags rejuvenation, survivorship, paediatric, late-effects.
Shares Long-term follow-up in the United Kingdom: what a survivor is actually offered, Education, work and the years that were interrupted, Fragmented care and guideline gaps, Survivorship and late effects are neglected and the tags rejuvenation, survivorship, paediatric, late-effects.
Shares The heart after anthracyclines and chest radiotherapy in childhood, Second cancers after childhood cancer: the risk by treatment, and why it is falling, Survivorship care and late-effects surveillance, Survivorship and late effects are neglected and the tags rejuvenation, survivorship, paediatric, late-effects.
Shares Education, work and the years that were interrupted, Fragmented care and guideline gaps, Survivorship care and late-effects surveillance, Survivorship and late effects are neglected and the tags rejuvenation, survivorship, paediatric, late-effects.
Shares The Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines, Survivorship and late effects are neglected and the tags rejuvenation, survivorship, paediatric, late-effects.
Shares PanCareSurFup and the European survivor cohorts, Growth and final height after treatment in childhood, and growth hormone, Breast cancer after chest radiotherapy in childhood, and the screening that follows, Education, work and the years that were interrupted and the tags survivorship, paediatric.