OnCo
ideasIdea

Screen every patient for financial hardship at diagnosis and connect them to help

Cancer often ruins families financially, and money worries make people skip treatment. Ask about finances at the first visit, as routinely as asking about allergies, and route people to assistance.

Financial toxicity is common, predicts non-adherence and worse outcomes, and is rarely assessed. Validated brief instruments (such as the COST measure) can be added to intake, with positive screens triggering referral to financial navigators, charity programmes, and benefit advice. This is cheap and addresses a cause of care fragmentation and abandonment in every health system, insured or not.

Hypothesis
Routine financial screening with navigation will reduce treatment non-adherence attributable to cost by at least a third and improve financial-toxicity scores at six months.
Rationale
Screening for distress became standard once it was embedded in intake; financial hardship is more prevalent than clinical distress and has a clearer remedy.
What would test it
A randomised implementation across ten clinics with adherence, financial-toxicity scores, and use of assistance as endpoints.
Maturity
early clinical
Who has to act
clinic
Cost to try
Small (under $1M)
Years to first evidence
2
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

4top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links