A spacer injected between the prostate and the rectum pushes the bowel out of the high-dose area for a few months and then dissolves. Randomised trials found fewer bowel side effects, but the procedure carries its own rare serious complications, and England's guidance allows it only with special arrangements for consent and audit.
What it is. Before prostate radiotherapy, a hydrogel, hyaluronic acid or a biodegradable balloon is placed through the skin between the prostate and the rectum under ultrasound, creating a gap of about a centimetre that lasts through treatment and is absorbed afterwards.
The randomised evidence. In the pivotal hydrogel trial, 222 men having 79.2 Gy in 44 fractions were randomised to spacer or none. The spacer created 12.6 millimetres of separation against 1.6 in controls, cut the rectal volume receiving 70 Gy from 12.4 to 3.3 per cent, and late rectal toxicity at 3 to 15 months was 2.0 against 7.0 per cent; 11.6 against 21.4 per cent of men had a meaningful decline in bowel quality of life at 15 months. A meta-analysis of one randomised trial and six cohort studies with 1,011 men found late grade 2 or worse rectal effects of 1.5 against 5.7 per cent (risk ratio 0.23, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.06 to 0.99). With four-week hypofractionated treatment, a randomised trial of a hyaluronic acid spacer in 201 men found acute grade 2 or worse bowel effects in 2.9 against 13.8 per cent.
The harms the trials did not show. A review of the United States device-reporting database from 2015 to May 2023, against 206,619 devices sold, found 990 reported adverse events, including 91 abscesses and 91 fistulas, 123 of grade 3 or worse and five deaths; 35 events occurred before radiotherapy began, pointing at the device rather than the radiation. Reporting databases cannot give a rate, but they show complications more serious than the trials recorded.
The guidance. NICE HealthTech guidance 659 (formerly IPG752, 2023) states that the evidence on safety and efficacy "is limited in quality" and that the procedure "should only be used with special arrangements for clinical governance, consent, and audit or research". That is why this record is graded promising rather than proven: the dosimetric gain is reliable, the clinical benefit is modest in absolute terms and the rare harms are serious. Adoption is not measured by any source OnCo found for the NHS.
Shares Toxicity and quality of life are undervalued and the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:promising.
Shares Toxicity and quality of life are undervalued and the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:promising.
Shares Toxicity and quality of life are undervalued and the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:promising.
Shares Toxicity and quality of life are undervalued and the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:promising.
Shares Toxicity and quality of life are undervalued and the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:promising.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:promising.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:promising.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:promising.
Every source this page cites, grouped by who published it. Grouping is read from the web address, not assigned by hand.
A source that has moved or gone is reported by the weekly link check. /audit/