Closed-system transfer devices are sealed connectors meant to stop chemotherapy escaping when it is prepared and given. US standards require them for giving hazardous drugs, but a Cochrane review found only weak observational studies and could not say whether they reduce staff exposure.
The evidence. The Cochrane review (2018) found 24 observational cluster studies in 359 hospitals and no randomised trials; all were at serious risk of bias, mostly in pharmacy staff, and mostly of one device. Very low certainty evidence was insufficient to show a difference in staff urine tests or surface contamination, and the authors wrote that "no firm conclusions can be drawn". They suggested multicentre randomised trials, or interrupted time series, measuring exposure to the drugs actually used and short-term health outcomes.
The standards. ASCO's safe handling standards (2019) rated the literature as low quality, noted that no standard test of device performance existed, and reported that USP chapter 800 requires the devices for nursing administration and recommends them for compounding. The devices add cost to every dose; adoption has not been measured by any source read.
Shares Oncology pharmacy automation and compounding robots, Closed-system transfer devices for hazardous drugs (PhaSeal, ChemoLock, Equashield).
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:untested.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:untested.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:untested.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:untested.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:untested.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:untested.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:untested.
Every source this page cites, grouped by who published it. Grouping is read from the web address, not assigned by hand.
A source that has moved or gone is reported by the weekly link check. /audit/