Weight loss and poor eating during cancer treatment are common and often missed. A European guideline strongly recommends checking intake and weight from diagnosis, and in a randomised trial of hospital patients with cancer at nutritional risk, tailored nutrition support lowered 30-day deaths from 19.9 to 14.1 per cent. Of 100 Italian centres surveyed, 31 assessed every patient.
The guideline. The ESPEN practical guideline on clinical nutrition in cancer opens with the recommendation "to regularly evaluate nutritional intake, weight change, and body mass index (BMI), beginning with cancer diagnosis and repeated depending on the stability of the clinical situation", graded as a strong recommendation.
The trial. In a preplanned secondary analysis of the Swiss multicentre EFFORT trial, 506 inpatients whose main admission diagnosis was cancer and who were at nutritional risk on the NRS 2002 screen were randomised to protocol-guided individual nutritional support or standard hospital food. Thirty-day mortality was 14.1 per cent against 19.9 per cent (adjusted odds ratio 0.57, 95 per cent confidence interval 0.35 to 0.94), and function and quality of life also improved; each additional point of nutritional risk predicted higher mortality over 180 days. This is one trial, in hospital inpatients, analysed as a subgroup, which is why the grade is moderate; outpatient evidence for screening itself is weaker.
The measured gap. Of 165 Italian oncology centres surveyed by CIPOMO, 100 responded: 67 routinely assessed nutrition at diagnosis but only 31 did so for every patient, 69 per cent used a validated screening tool, and systematic reassessment during treatment was reported by 15 per cent.
Three technology pages and two term pages on OnCo cite this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing pages listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
One technology page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.
Shares Nutrition support and cachexia management and the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:proven-unevenly-used.
Shares Nutrition support and cachexia management and the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:proven-unevenly-used.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:proven-unevenly-used.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:proven-unevenly-used.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:proven-unevenly-used.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:proven-unevenly-used.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:proven-unevenly-used.
Shares the tags protocol-upgrade, upgrade:proven-unevenly-used.
Every source this page cites, grouped by who published it. Grouping is read from the web address, not assigned by hand.
A source that has moved or gone is reported by the weekly link check. /audit/