OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Angiosarcoma: the decisions you may face

4 treatment settings, 4 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Early / localised

Localised cutaneous (scalp, face)

2 options

Wide excision where feasible plus wide-field radiotherapy; neoadjuvant or definitive weekly paclitaxel with radiotherapy when surgery is not possible.

The options, in plain words

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits

A microtubule poison discovered in the Pacific yew tree, among the most used chemotherapies in breast, lung, and ovarian cancer.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam) and Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. For my situation (localised cutaneous (scalp, face)), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Wide excision where feasible plus wide-field radiotherapy; neoadjuvant or definitive weekly paclitaxel with radiotherapy when surgery is not possible.
  5. Am I a candidate for Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Other settings

Radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma

Total mastectomy with wide skin excision; consider neoadjuvant paclitaxel; re-irradiation is limited by prior dose.

The options, in plain words

A microtubule poison discovered in the Pacific yew tree, among the most used chemotherapies in breast, lung, and ovarian cancer.

The red chemotherapy drug from a soil bacterium that is still the backbone of treatment for sarcoma, lymphoma and breast cancer, limited by cumulative heart damage.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cumulative dose: risk rises steeply above 400-550 mg/m² (see the anthracycline calculator).
  • Reduce by 50% for bilirubin 20-50 µmol/L and 75% for 50-85 µmol/L.
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel and Doxorubicin, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. For my situation (radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Total mastectomy with wide skin excision; consider neoadjuvant paclitaxel; re-irradiation is limited by prior dose.
  5. Am I a candidate for Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Weekly paclitaxel (ANGIOTAX) or doxorubicin-based chemotherapy; liposomal doxorubicin in frail patients.

The options, in plain words

A microtubule poison discovered in the Pacific yew tree, among the most used chemotherapies in breast, lung, and ovarian cancer.

The red chemotherapy drug from a soil bacterium that is still the backbone of treatment for sarcoma, lymphoma and breast cancer, limited by cumulative heart damage.

Doxorubicin wrapped in a fatty bubble so it reaches tumours with less heart damage; a workhorse of relapsed ovarian cancer.

The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record
  • Cumulative dose: risk rises steeply above 400-550 mg/m² (see the anthracycline calculator).
  • Reduce by 50% for bilirubin 20-50 µmol/L and 75% for 50-85 µmol/L.
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel, Doxorubicin and Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in ANGIOTAX, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (advanced, first line), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Weekly paclitaxel (ANGIOTAX) or doxorubicin-based chemotherapy; liposomal doxorubicin in frail patients.
  6. Am I a candidate for Paclitaxel / nab-paclitaxel, Doxorubicin, Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  7. How do the results of ANGIOTAX apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Gemcitabine, pazopanib; checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) for cutaneous scalp and face disease, off label or in trials.

The options, in plain words

A versatile chemotherapy used in pancreatic, bladder, lung, ovarian, breast and biliary cancers, in nasopharyngeal cancer, and as a bladder instillation.

Pazopanib is the only multi-kinase inhibitor approved for soft-tissue sarcoma (excluding fat-derived tumours), used after chemotherapy fails.

Nivolumab was the second PD-1 blocker and is often combined with ipilimumab. Long-term data show about half of advanced melanoma patients alive at 10 years on the combination.

Ipilimumab was the first checkpoint inhibitor (2011), and proved the immune system could be unleashed against cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 that release the brakes on T cells so they attack the cancer. They are approved in more than 20 tumour types and produce lasting, sometimes curative responses that chemotherapy rarely does, but most patients do not respond and autoimmune side effects are the cost.

  • Durable, sometimes curative responses
  • Broad applicability
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Take on an empty stomach (1 hour before or 2 hours after food).
  • Known QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.
  • 200 mg daily in moderate impairment; avoid in severe.
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Colitis with ipilimumab (1+3 mg/kg) · Monotherapy pooled unless stated25%14.4%
Hepatitis with ipilimumab · Monotherapy pooled unless stated15%13.4%
Colitis · Monotherapy pooled unless stated2.9%1.7%
Hepatitis · Monotherapy pooled unless stated1.8%1.5%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Colitis (with nivolumab 1+3) · Nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, melanoma25%14.4%
Hepatitis (with nivolumab) · Nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, melanoma15%13.4%
Rash (with nivolumab) · Nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, melanoma28%4.8%
Adrenal insufficiency (with nivolumab) · Nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg, melanoma8%2.6%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Most patients do not respond
  • Autoimmune toxicity
  • Biomarkers are imperfect
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Gemcitabine, Pazopanib, Nivolumab and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Nivolumab or Ipilimumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (later lines), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Gemcitabine, pazopanib; checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab) for cutaneous scalp and face disease, off label or in trials.
  6. Am I a candidate for Gemcitabine, Pazopanib, Nivolumab or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.