OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Early-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma: the decisions you may face

5 treatment settings, 5 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

FDG-PET/CT with Lugano staging; bone marrow biopsy no longer needed when PET is used; fertility counselling and cardiac baseline.

The options, in plain words
FDG PETStandard of care

FDG PET is the standard PET scan. A radioactive sugar shows which tissues are burning glucose fast, which most cancers do.

  • Universal availability
  • Decades of validation

Protecting the ability to have children before cancer treatment that damages eggs, sperm or the womb: sperm and egg or embryo freezing, ovarian tissue freezing, ovarian shielding and, for some breast cancers, temporary ovarian suppression.

  • Established live-birth outcomes for sperm, oocyte, embryo and ovarian tissue
  • Random-start protocols avoid treatment delay
  • POSITIVE trial reassures about pregnancy after breast cancer
Cardio-oncologyEstablished

Cardio-oncology builds heart risk assessment, monitoring and prevention into cancer care so patients can finish curative treatment without trading cancer for heart failure. It targets anthracycline and trastuzumab damage, checkpoint-inhibitor myocarditis and radiation heart disease using echocardiography, troponin tests and protective drugs; specialist clinics are concentrated in large centres.

  • Enables completion of curative therapy
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Non-specific: infection and inflammation are also hot
  • Brain background
  • Poor in indolent tumours
  • Cost and insurance coverage (mandated in only some US states)
  • Prepubertal boys have only experimental options
  • Referral gaps, especially in men, adolescents and LMICs
  • Workforce and access
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between FDG PET, Oncofertility and fertility preservation and Cardio-oncology, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (staging), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: FDG-PET/CT with Lugano staging; bone marrow biopsy no longer needed when PET is used; fertility counselling and cardiac baseline.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Early / localised

Early favourable disease

Two cycles of ABVD with 20 Gy involved-site radiotherapy (HD10); or PET-adapted chemotherapy alone (three ABVD if PET-negative after two, RAPID and H10) accepting a small increase in relapse.

The options, in plain words

The red chemotherapy drug from a soil bacterium that is still the backbone of treatment for sarcoma, lymphoma and breast cancer, limited by cumulative heart damage.

Vinblastine is the vinca alkaloid in ABVD, the standard Hodgkin lymphoma regimen, and was formerly in the cisplatin combinations that first cured testicular cancer.

Dacarbazine is an older chemotherapy infusion. It was the standard treatment for advanced melanoma for decades and is the D in the ABVD regimen that cures most Hodgkin lymphoma.

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits

Scan after two cycles of chemotherapy; if the tumour has gone dark, give less treatment, and if not, give more. Hodgkin lymphoma pioneered this.

  • Spares most patients bleomycin, radiation or intensified chemotherapy
  • Identifies the minority who need escalation
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cumulative dose: risk rises steeply above 400-550 mg/m² (see the anthracycline calculator).
  • Reduce by 50% for bilirubin 20-50 µmol/L and 75% for 50-85 µmol/L.
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Interim PET has imperfect positive predictive value (many PET2-positive patients are cured anyway)
  • Omitting radiotherapy trades a few percent PFS for late-toxicity avoidance
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (early favourable disease), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Two cycles of ABVD with 20 Gy involved-site radiotherapy (HD10); or PET-adapted chemotherapy alone (three ABVD if PET-negative after two, RAPID and H10) accepting a small increase in relapse.
  6. Am I a candidate for Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Early / localised

Early unfavourable disease

Four cycles of ABVD (or two escalated BEACOPP plus two ABVD) with 30 Gy involved-site radiotherapy; radiotherapy omitted in PET-negative patients after HD17.

The options, in plain words

The red chemotherapy drug from a soil bacterium that is still the backbone of treatment for sarcoma, lymphoma and breast cancer, limited by cumulative heart damage.

Vinblastine is the vinca alkaloid in ABVD, the standard Hodgkin lymphoma regimen, and was formerly in the cisplatin combinations that first cured testicular cancer.

Dacarbazine is an older chemotherapy infusion. It was the standard treatment for advanced melanoma for decades and is the D in the ABVD regimen that cures most Hodgkin lymphoma.

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits

Scan after two cycles of chemotherapy; if the tumour has gone dark, give less treatment, and if not, give more. Hodgkin lymphoma pioneered this.

  • Spares most patients bleomycin, radiation or intensified chemotherapy
  • Identifies the minority who need escalation
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Cumulative dose: risk rises steeply above 400-550 mg/m² (see the anthracycline calculator).
  • Reduce by 50% for bilirubin 20-50 µmol/L and 75% for 50-85 µmol/L.
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Interim PET has imperfect positive predictive value (many PET2-positive patients are cured anyway)
  • Omitting radiotherapy trades a few percent PFS for late-toxicity avoidance
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (early unfavourable disease), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Four cycles of ABVD (or two escalated BEACOPP plus two ABVD) with 30 Gy involved-site radiotherapy; radiotherapy omitted in PET-negative patients after HD17.
  6. Am I a candidate for Doxorubicin, Vinblastine, Dacarbazine, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Other settings

Children and adolescents

Response-adapted Children's Oncology Group regimens with radiotherapy for slow responders; AHOD2131 tests brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab.

The options, in plain words

The ADC that made the modern field credible (2011), for Hodgkin lymphoma and CD30+ lymphomas.

Nivolumab was the second PD-1 blocker and is often combined with ipilimumab. Long-term data show about half of advanced melanoma patients alive at 10 years on the combination.

The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm91%82%
Febrile neutropenia · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm19%19%
Peripheral sensory neuropathy · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm65%10%
Vomiting · ECHELON-1, A+AVD arm33%3%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Colitis with ipilimumab (1+3 mg/kg) · Monotherapy pooled unless stated25%14.4%
Hepatitis with ipilimumab · Monotherapy pooled unless stated15%13.4%
Colitis · Monotherapy pooled unless stated2.9%1.7%
Hepatitis · Monotherapy pooled unless stated1.8%1.5%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Brentuximab vedotin and Nivolumab, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in AHOD2131 (COG / NCTN), and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Brentuximab vedotin or Nivolumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  7. For my situation (children and adolescents), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Response-adapted Children's Oncology Group regimens with radiotherapy for slow responders; AHOD2131 tests brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab.
  8. Am I a candidate for Brentuximab vedotin, Nivolumab, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  9. How do the results of AHOD2131 (COG / NCTN) apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Special situations

Survivorship

2 options

Cardiac surveillance, breast screening from eight years after chest radiotherapy in women, thyroid checks and second-cancer awareness for life.

The options, in plain words
Cardio-oncologyEstablished

Cardio-oncology builds heart risk assessment, monitoring and prevention into cancer care so patients can finish curative treatment without trading cancer for heart failure. It targets anthracycline and trastuzumab damage, checkpoint-inhibitor myocarditis and radiation heart disease using echocardiography, troponin tests and protective drugs; specialist clinics are concentrated in large centres.

  • Enables completion of curative therapy

Low-dose breast X-ray used for screening. Newer 3D versions find more cancers with fewer false alarms.

  • Proven mortality benefit
  • Cheap and scalable
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Workforce and access
  • Reduced sensitivity in dense breasts
  • Overdiagnosis of indolent lesions
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Cardio-oncology and Mammography & tomosynthesis, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Hodgkin Lymphoma), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (survivorship), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Cardiac surveillance, breast screening from eight years after chest radiotherapy in women, thyroid checks and second-cancer awareness for life.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.