Loading
Below, week by week, is what OnCo's record of Monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma says about the first two months: the order is typical, the timing is yours to ask about. An aggressive T-cell lymphoma of the small bowel that looks and presents much like the lymphoma that complicates coeliac disease but has no connection with coeliac disease at all. It was separated out of that diagnosis in 2016, it is made of monotonous small to medium cells, and it often presents with perforation or obstruction of the bowel. Sections appear only where the record has something to say. Orientation, not medical advice.
Staging tests establish exactly what and where the cancer is. Everything else follows from the answers.
Often made on small bowel resected as an emergency for perforation or obstruction. What separates it from enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma is the absence of coeliac disease, the monotonous small to medium cells rather than varied large ones, a CD8-positive and CD56-positive phenotype, and SETD2 mutation with JAK3 and STAT5B rather than JAK1 and STAT3. Neither carries Epstein-Barr virus, which separates both from NK/T-cell lymphoma of the gut.
Ask which of these were tested and what the results were; see the report reader for what each value means.
These specialties appear in the standard of care for this cancer. In most centres they meet weekly as a tumour board to agree each plan; you can ask when yours was discussed and what was decided.
A second opinion from a centre that treats many similar cases is normal, not rude; the standard of care tells you what to compare it against.
Each row is a setting from the standard of care, in the order it usually arises. Not all will apply to you; your stage and biomarkers decide which do. The guideline grade, where recorded, says how strong the evidence is.
There is no randomised evidence of any kind. The largest real-world comparison took 50 patients who received systemic chemotherapy and compared a modified version of the Newcastle regimen developed for enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, giving cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone alternating with ifosfamide, etoposide and epirubicin but leaving out the methotrexate, against ordinary chemotherapy of the same backbone: median progression-free survival 14.4 against 6.6 months and overall survival 28.7 against 11.7 months, with the regimen remaining an independent predictor of better progression-free survival after adjustment. The two-year cumulative incidence of relapse in the central nervous system was 12.1 per cent, which is what the omitted methotrexate had been intended to prevent. Entry into a trial is a reasonable first choice rather than a last resort.
Generated from this cancer's standard of care, biomarkers and open problems. Take the group that matches where you are. To tick, add your own and print, open the one-page appointment sheet.
Much of what helps in the first weeks is free if you know to ask: testing, helplines, rides and lodging, second opinions, trial travel.
Every term links to the glossary.