EvidenceBiliary tract cancer (all types)

The IHC 3+ subgroup result is why the tumour-agnostic label is written at 3+ and not 2+, and why a gallbladder cancer with a strong HER2 stain now has two on-label choices (zanidatamab, trastuzumab deruxtecan) after chemotherapy. Lung toxicity again ran higher than in breast cancer.

For gallbladder cancer the sobering points are that HER2 can disappear under HER2-directed pressure, that SMAD4 co-mutation predicts a worse response, and that sequencing at progression, not just at diagnosis, may be needed to guide the next line.

Together with the JCO Precision Oncology cohort this makes residual disease testing in biliary cancer prognostic to the same degree as in colon cancer. Nobody has yet shown that acting on it helps; that is the trial gap the ideas on this page name.

Very wide confidence intervals from a small cohort, but the direction matches the larger 2026 analysis. Gallbladder cancer recurs early and distantly after re-resection, which is exactly the setting where a residual disease test could pick who gets more than capecitabine.

The tail of long survivors is the case for chemo-immunotherapy in gallbladder cancer, where the median gain is under two months. Who lands in that tail is still unknown; no biomarker in the trial predicts it.

Together with the DESTINY-PanTumor02 biliary cohort this is the evidence behind trastuzumab deruxtecan's tumour-agnostic IHC 3+ label being used in gallbladder cancer; the lung toxicity rate, higher than in breast cancer, is the caution for a population with pre-existing lung and liver compromise.

This is the reference European standard against which UK and NHS practice for gallbladder cancer is compared; it treats gallbladder cancer within biliary tract cancer rather than as its own disease.

One cancer page on OnCo cites this paper by its DOI; this record gives the citation a page of its own so a reader can follow it without leaving OnCo. Read the abstract above alongside the citing page listed under Related; the record was created automatically from the Europe PMC entry and its figures have not been checked by hand.

A positive randomised phase 2 that the German NALIRICC trial failed to reproduce; guidelines list the regimen as an option, and the disagreement is a reminder that single-country phase 2 results in biliary cancer need replication.

The first prospective evidence that HER2 blockade works in biliary cancer, which led to HERIZON-BTC-01 and the HER2 antibody-drug conjugate studies; the definition of HER2-positive here (amplification or overexpression) is looser than the later IHC 3+ label.

FOLFOX became the guideline second-line option for gallbladder cancer on this trial. The gain is real but small, which is why later-line care now starts with a search for a HER2 or other targetable alteration.

Biliary tumours are often diagnosed on tiny biopsies or brushings, so a blood-based panel that detects HER2 amplification and other targets in half of patients is a practical route to testing, with tissue confirmation where the blood is uninformative.

The germline finding is the practical lesson: a meaningful minority of biliary cancer patients carry inherited repair-gene mutations that matter for PARP inhibitor eligibility and for their relatives, which argues for germline testing alongside tumour sequencing.

The prevalence estimate that made HER2 the first gallbladder-relevant target; it argues for testing every advanced gallbladder cancer, since one in five may qualify for zanidatamab or trastuzumab deruxtecan.

The paper that separated the biliary tree into molecular subtypes: FGFR2 and IDH belong to the intrahepatic ducts, while gallbladder cancer carries HER2, ELF3 and an APOBEC signature. Its hypermutated, checkpoint-high poor-prognosis group foreshadowed immunotherapy.