OnCo
ideasIdea

A permanent neutral non-profit sponsor for multi-company platform trials

Trials that test many companies' drugs side by side against one shared control work best when nobody's company runs them. A standing non-profit sponsor would make this the norm rather than a rare exception.

A permanent, funded, non-profit organisation that acts as regulatory sponsor and operator for master protocols in which multiple companies contribute agents, on the model of QuantumLeap Healthcare Collaborative (I-SPY 2), the Lung-MAP public-private partnership, GBM AGILE and the UK's STAMPEDE. The sponsor holds the protocol, the shared control arm, the statistical engine and the data, and offers companies a standard entry contract with pre-agreed rights to use platform results for registration. Each platform today is built from scratch by heroic individuals; institutionalising the function lowers the cost and time of adding a new disease platform from years to months.

Hypothesis
A standing neutral sponsor launches at least five new disease platforms within four years, each enrolling multiple company-owned agents, and reduces per-agent evaluation cost and time by at least a third relative to stand-alone phase 2 trials of the same agents.
Rationale
I-SPY 2 graduated several agents to phase 3 and informed approvals at a fraction of stand-alone trial cost; GBM AGILE and Lung-MAP demonstrate industry willingness to participate under neutral sponsorship. The bottleneck is the absence of a durable institution, not of willing companies.
What would test it
Fund the sponsor for five years with a mandate to launch platforms in three under-served indications; report agents evaluated, time to activation and cost per agent against historical stand-alone trials.
Maturity
being tested at scale
Who has to act
philanthropy
Cost to try
Medium ($1M to $50M)
Years to first evidence
3
Bottlenecks it attacks

Connected

11top

Pages like this

not linked directly; found by shared links