OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Acute myeloid leukaemia in older or unfit patients: the decisions you may face

4 treatment settings, 4 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Special situations

Newly diagnosed, unfit for intensive chemotherapy

Venetoclax plus azacitidine (VIALE-A) or venetoclax plus decitabine; ivosidenib plus azacitidine for IDH1-mutated disease; targeted triplets in trials.

The options, in plain words

A pill that removes the survival shield from leukaemia cells, enabling chemotherapy-free, time-limited treatment for CLL.

A gentle chemotherapy that switches silenced genes back on. With venetoclax it became the standard for older people with AML who cannot take intensive treatment.

Decitabine (Dacogen) is an infusion that loosens the chemical silencing of genes in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia, helping the bone marrow work again. An oral version combined with cedazuridine has its own record.

The first drug to block a mutant metabolic enzyme in cancer. With azacitidine it tripled survival in IDH1-mutated AML that could not take intensive chemotherapy.

The evidence behind it
The main trade-offs on record
  • Take with a meal and water. Avoid grapefruit, Seville oranges and starfruit.
  • Reduce by 50% in severe impairment.
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Neutropenia · VIALE-A combination arm-42%

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Differentiation syndrome · AGILE combination arm14%-
  • Known QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Venetoclax, Azacitidine, Decitabine and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in VIALE-A and AGILE, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. Which side effects of Azacitidine or Ivosidenib are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  5. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  6. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Acute Myeloid Leukemia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  7. For my situation (newly diagnosed, unfit for intensive chemotherapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Venetoclax plus azacitidine (VIALE-A) or venetoclax plus decitabine; ivosidenib plus azacitidine for IDH1-mutated disease; targeted triplets in trials.
  8. Am I a candidate for Venetoclax, Azacitidine, Decitabine or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  9. How do the results of VIALE-A and AGILE apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Special situations

Fit older patients, 60 to 75

7+3 or CPX-351 for secondary disease, with a FLT3 inhibitor where indicated, and reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant in remission.

The options, in plain words

The intensive chemotherapy that has induced remission in fit AML patients since 1973: seven days of one drug, three of another. Still the backbone that targeted drugs are added to.

The two old chemotherapy drugs packed together into tiny fat bubbles at a fixed ratio, which doubled five-year survival in older adults with high-risk AML.

The first drug to improve survival in FLT3-mutated AML, added to standard chemotherapy: median survival went from about two years to more than six.

Quizartinib is a more selective FLT3 blocker that, added to chemotherapy, roughly doubled median survival in the highest-risk FLT3 subtype.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation replaces a patient's blood system with a donor's after conditioning chemotherapy, so donor immune cells hunt down leukaemia left behind. It remains the only cure for adverse-risk acute myeloid leukaemia, high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and Richter transformation, at the price of graft-versus-host disease.

  • Curative for otherwise incurable leukaemia
  • Graft-versus-leukaemia is an antigen-agnostic immune therapy
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Febrile neutropenia · Both arms of RATIFY; not drug-specific-84%
  • Take with food; antiemetic prophylaxis.
  • Possible QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Known QT prolongation. Boxed warning: QT prolongation, torsades and cardiac arrest. Do not start if QTcF above 450 ms; avoid QT-prolonging drugs; REMS programme.
  • Treatment-related mortality 10-20%
  • Chronic GVHD
  • Relapse remains the main cause of failure
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Cytarabine + anthracycline ('7+3'), CPX-351 (liposomal daunorubicin-cytarabine), Midostaurin and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Midostaurin are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Acute Myeloid Leukemia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (fit older patients, 60 to 75), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: 7+3 or CPX-351 for secondary disease, with a FLT3 inhibitor where indicated, and reduced-intensity allogeneic transplant in remission.
  7. Am I a candidate for Cytarabine + anthracycline ('7+3'), CPX-351 (liposomal daunorubicin-cytarabine), Midostaurin or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Other settings

Not a candidate for any leukaemia-directed therapy

Hydroxyurea for count control, transfusion support and palliative care; low-dose cytarabine or glasdegib combinations where tolerated.

The options, in plain words

Hydroxyurea is a cheap, decades-old pill that lowers high blood counts in polycythaemia vera and essential thrombocythaemia and is also the main drug for sickle cell disease.

Red cell and platelet transfusions, iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents keep patients safe through chemotherapy and marrow failure; restrictive thresholds and ESA caution reflect trials showing more is not better.

  • Life-saving in acute leukaemia and transplant
  • Restrictive strategies proven safe and cheaper
  • New MDS agents reduce transfusion burden

Glasdegib is a hedgehog-pathway pill that, with low-dose chemotherapy, extends survival in older AML patients who cannot have intensive treatment; it has largely been displaced by venetoclax combinations.

Cytarabine is the core chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukaemia, given with an anthracycline as the classic 7+3 induction and at high doses for consolidation; it is also injected into the spinal fluid to treat or prevent leukaemia in the brain.

The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Blood supply shortages, especially in LMICs
  • ESA safety restricts use
  • Iron overload and alloimmunisation with chronic transfusion
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide), Transfusion support and anaemia management, Glasdegib and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  4. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Acute Myeloid Leukemia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  5. For my situation (not a candidate for any leukaemia-directed therapy), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Hydroxyurea for count control, transfusion support and palliative care; low-dose cytarabine or glasdegib combinations where tolerated.
  6. Am I a candidate for Hydroxyurea (hydroxycarbamide), Glasdegib, Cytarabine, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Second line

Relapse after venetoclax-azacitidine

Genotype-directed drugs (gilteritinib, IDH inhibitors, menin inhibitors) or trials; transplant for the few who respond.

The options, in plain words

A single pill that beats salvage chemotherapy for relapsed FLT3-mutated AML, and the backbone of the triplets now being tested in frontline disease.

The first drug to block a mutant metabolic enzyme in cancer. With azacitidine it tripled survival in IDH1-mutated AML that could not take intensive chemotherapy.

Revumenib (Revuforj) is the first menin inhibitor (2024), for acute leukaemias with KMT2A rearrangements or NPM1 mutations.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation replaces a patient's blood system with a donor's after conditioning chemotherapy, so donor immune cells hunt down leukaemia left behind. It remains the only cure for adverse-risk acute myeloid leukaemia, high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and Richter transformation, at the price of graft-versus-host disease.

  • Curative for otherwise incurable leukaemia
  • Graft-versus-leukaemia is an antigen-agnostic immune therapy
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Differentiation syndrome · Boxed warning3%-
  • Known QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Differentiation syndrome · AGILE combination arm14%-
  • Known QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Known QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.
  • Treatment-related mortality 10-20%
  • Chronic GVHD
  • Relapse remains the main cause of failure
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Gilteritinib, Ivosidenib, Revumenib and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Gilteritinib or Ivosidenib are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. Does your recommendation follow the current guideline (NCCN Guidelines: Acute Myeloid Leukemia), and if it departs from it, why?
    Why: Departures from guidelines are sometimes right for an individual; they should be explained.
  6. For my situation (relapse after venetoclax-azacitidine), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Genotype-directed drugs (gilteritinib, IDH inhibitors, menin inhibitors) or trials; transplant for the few who respond.
  7. Am I a candidate for Gilteritinib, Ivosidenib, Revumenib, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.