OnCo

Sign in to keep your watchlist

Your watched pages live in this browser. Sign in with an email link and OnCo keeps the same list on every device you use. Only your email address and your watchlist are stored.

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma: the decisions you may face

3 treatment settings, 3 with more than one named option. Each section lays out the options the standard of care names, what each is for, the trials behind them with their recorded results, the side effects and cautions on record, and questions to ask. Built from the cancer page's standard-of-care rows; nothing here is advice for your case.

Early / localised

Localised, limb or trunk

Wide resection with preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy; neoadjuvant anthracycline-ifosfamide for large, deep, high-grade tumours in fit patients (ISG-STS 1001).

The options, in plain words

Removing a bone or soft-tissue sarcoma while keeping the arm or leg, rebuilding with metal implants, bone grafts or growing prostheses in children.

  • Preserves function without compromising survival
  • Custom implants for pelvis and spine

IMRT and IGRT shape the radiation beam to the tumour's outline from multiple angles and check the patient's position with a scan before every session, so surrounding organs receive less dose. Fewer, larger doses are now standard in breast and prostate cancer, but a low-dose bath still spreads across normal tissue.

  • Conformal dose, fewer side effects
  • Hypofractionation saves visits

The red chemotherapy drug from a soil bacterium that is still the backbone of treatment for sarcoma, lymphoma and breast cancer, limited by cumulative heart damage.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating chemotherapy partnered with doxorubicin in sarcoma and with etoposide in Ewing sarcoma, given with a bladder-protecting drug.

The evidence behind it
  • High-risk localised soft-tissue sarcoma of extremities/trunk: neoadjuvant epirubicin-ifosfamide vs histotype-tailored chemotherapy

    Standard arm DFS HR ~0.45 vs tailored; OS 89% vs 64% at 46 months.

    Overall survival at 46 months (%): Epirubicin-ifosfamide 89 (n=142) vs Histotype-tailored 64 (n=145) · source
The main trade-offs on record
  • Implant infection and mechanical failure over decades
  • Requires specialist sarcoma centres
  • Low-dose bath to normal tissue
  • Motion management
  • Cumulative dose: risk rises steeply above 400-550 mg/m² (see the anthracycline calculator).
  • Reduce by 50% for bilirubin 20-50 µmol/L and 75% for 50-85 µmol/L.
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Limb-salvage surgery and endoprosthetic reconstruction, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), Doxorubicin and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in ISG-STS 1001, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (localised, limb or trunk), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Wide resection with preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy; neoadjuvant anthracycline-ifosfamide for large, deep, high-grade tumours in fit patients (ISG-STS 1001).
  6. Am I a candidate for Doxorubicin, Ifosfamide, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  7. How do the results of ISG-STS 1001 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Doxorubicin alone or doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (EORTC 62012) when response matters.

The options, in plain words

The red chemotherapy drug from a soil bacterium that is still the backbone of treatment for sarcoma, lymphoma and breast cancer, limited by cumulative heart damage.

Ifosfamide is an alkylating chemotherapy partnered with doxorubicin in sarcoma and with etoposide in Ewing sarcoma, given with a bladder-protecting drug.

The evidence behind it
  • Advanced soft tissue sarcoma, first line: doxorubicin plus ifosfamide versus doxorubicin alone
    Show survival figures (1)

    Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.

    • Median OS 14.3 vs 12.8 months (HR 0.83, not significant); median PFS 7.4 vs 4.6 months (HR 0.74).
    Overall survival (median) (months): Doxorubicin + ifosfamide 14.3 vs Doxorubicin 12.8 · HR 0.83 · source
The main trade-offs on record
  • Cumulative dose: risk rises steeply above 400-550 mg/m² (see the anthracycline calculator).
  • Reduce by 50% for bilirubin 20-50 µmol/L and 75% for 50-85 µmol/L.
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Doxorubicin and Ifosfamide, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. How closely do I match the people in EORTC 62012, and does that change what the results mean for me?
    Why: Trial populations are selected; age, fitness, prior treatment and biomarkers all affect how far results carry.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (advanced, first line), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Doxorubicin alone or doxorubicin plus ifosfamide (EORTC 62012) when response matters.
  6. Am I a candidate for Doxorubicin, Ifosfamide, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
  7. How do the results of EORTC 62012 apply to someone like me?
    Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

Gemcitabine-docetaxel, trabectedin, pazopanib; pembrolizumab in trials or off label after SARC028.

The options, in plain words

A versatile chemotherapy used in pancreatic, bladder, lung, ovarian, breast and biliary cancers, in nasopharyngeal cancer, and as a bladder instillation.

The first chemotherapy to extend life in prostate cancer (2004), now part of triplet therapy at first metastatic diagnosis.

A chemotherapy derived from a sea squirt, used with liposomal doxorubicin in relapsed ovarian cancer in Europe and for sarcomas.

Pazopanib is the only multi-kinase inhibitor approved for soft-tissue sarcoma (excluding fat-derived tumours), used after chemotherapy fails.

Pembrolizumab is a PD-1 blocking antibody approved in more than 40 settings, from melanoma and lung cancer to the first tumour-agnostic approval for mismatch-repair-deficient tumours in 2017, and before and after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer. A subcutaneous form arrived in 2025, and it is the backbone partner for ADCs and personalised neoantigen vaccines.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are antibodies against CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 that release the brakes on T cells so they attack the cancer. They are approved in more than 20 tumour types and produce lasting, sometimes curative responses that chemotherapy rarely does, but most patients do not respond and autoimmune side effects are the cost.

  • Durable, sometimes curative responses
  • Broad applicability
The evidence behind it

No trial record is attached to this row yet. The trials tab lists what is recruiting and the landmark trials for this cancer.

The main trade-offs on record
  • Do not give if bilirubin above ULN, or AST/ALT above 1.5 x ULN with alkaline phosphatase above 2.5 x ULN (treatment-related deaths).
  • Alcohol: avoid (hepatotoxicity). Dexamethasone 20 mg before each dose protects the liver.
  • Reduce to 0.9 mg/m² in moderate impairment; avoid in severe.
  • Take on an empty stomach (1 hour before or 2 hours after food).
  • Known QT prolongation. Avoid other QT-prolonging drugs where possible; check ECG and correct potassium and magnesium before and during treatment.
  • 200 mg daily in moderate impairment; avoid in severe.
Side effectAny gradeGrade 3+
Hypothyroidism (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients8%-
Pneumonitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients3.4%-
Colitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients1.7%-
Hepatitis (immune-mediated) · Pooled monotherapy data, >2,800 patients0.7%-
  • No pharmacokinetic interactions expected (antibody). See the irAE guide for toxicity management.

Rates from the label or pivotal trial as recorded on the product page; each grade 3+ figure links to its source.

  • Most patients do not respond
  • Autoimmune toxicity
  • Biomarkers are imperfect
Questions to ask about this decision
  1. Between Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, Trabectedin and the other options, which do you recommend for me, and what about my case would make you choose differently?
    Why: Guidelines list several reasonable options; the choice turns on details of your tumour, your health and your priorities.
  2. What is each option trying to achieve: cure, long control, or relief of symptoms, and over what time?
    Why: The aim shapes how much side effect and disruption is worth accepting.
  3. Which side effects of Pembrolizumab are most likely for me, which are reversible, and which would make us stop?
    Why: The recorded rates below come from labels and trials; your own risk depends on dose, other medicines and your health.
  4. What happens if I delay, or decline this step for now? Is the decision reversible?
    Why: Some decisions can wait for a second opinion or a trial slot; others cannot. Knowing which is part of the choice.
  5. For my situation (later lines), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Gemcitabine-docetaxel, trabectedin, pazopanib; pembrolizumab in trials or off label after SARC028.
  6. Am I a candidate for Gemcitabine, Docetaxel, Trabectedin or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Add these to your appointment list, or take the full question set for this cancer.

How to read this page. Options and results come from OnCo records with their sources; the settings are the standard-of-care rows on the cancer page, and the lines of therapy are on the sequencing grid. Where a setting names one path, the choice is usually about timing, trials and where to be treated: see expert centres. OnCo is orientation, not medical advice.