OnCo
cancersCancer

Mantle cell lymphoma

An uncommon B-cell lymphoma driven by cyclin D1 that used to behave badly in almost everyone. BTK inhibitors, CAR-T and now BCL2 drugs have changed it from chemotherapy-plus-transplant to targeted combinations.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) carries t(11;14) with cyclin D1 overexpression (SOX11-positive in classical MCL). Risk is set by MIPI, Ki-67, blastoid morphology and TP53 mutation, the last defining a group that fails chemo-immunotherapy and transplant. A leukaemic non-nodal variant behaves indolently.

Younger fit patients traditionally received cytarabine-containing induction and autologous transplant with rituximab maintenance; TRIANGLE (2024) showed adding ibrutinib to induction and maintenance is at least as good as transplant, and transplant is being abandoned. Older patients receive bendamustine-rituximab or R-CHOP; ECHO (2024) added acalabrutinib to BR first line (FDA approval 2025). Relapse is treated with covalent BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib 2013, acalabrutinib 2017, zanubrutinib 2019; ibrutinib's US MCL approval was withdrawn in 2023 after SHINE), then brexucabtagene autoleucel (ZUMA-2, 2020), the non-covalent BTKi pirtobrutinib (2023), or the BCL2 inhibitor sonrotoclax (2026); venetoclax-ibrutinib (SYMPATICO) is another option. Lisocabtagene was approved for MCL in 2024.

TP53-mutant MCL still does poorly with everything except CAR-T and bispecifics; glofitamab and CD20×CD3 agents are in phase 3.

State of the art today

  • Transplant is leaving first-line MCL: TRIANGLE made ibrutinib-containing induction and maintenance the new fit-patient standard.
  • BTK inhibitors sit in first line for older patients (ECHO) and at relapse; pirtobrutinib rescues covalent-BTKi failures.
  • CAR-T (ZUMA-2) gives long remissions after BTKi failure, including in TP53-mutant disease.
  • BCL2 inhibition is back: sonrotoclax approved for relapsed MCL in 2026 with venetoclax combinations close behind.
Who it affects

Mantle cell lymphoma makes up about 5-7% of non-Hodgkin lymphomas; incidence ~1 per 100,000 per year, median age ~68, 3:1 male.

Where the cases are

Cases by country · GLOBOCAN 2022
All countries →

No country-level case numbers. This cancer is not mapped to a GLOBOCAN site.

Standard of care

4top
First line, fit (<65-70)

Rituximab + high-dose cytarabine-based induction (e.g. R-CHOP/R-DHAP or Nordic) with ibrutinib and 2 years ibrutinib maintenance; autologous transplant no longer adds benefit when ibrutinib is used (TRIANGLE).

First line, older or unfit

Bendamustine-rituximab + acalabrutinib (ECHO, approved 2025) or BR alone with rituximab maintenance; R-CHOP alternative.

NCCN · Category 1 (BR + acalabrutinib)
Relapsed, BTKi-naive

Covalent BTK inhibitor (acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib; ibrutinib ex-US) ± venetoclax (SYMPATICO).

NCCN · Category 2A
Relapsed after BTKi

Brexucabtagene or lisocabtagene CAR-T; pirtobrutinib; sonrotoclax (2026); allogeneic HSCT in selected patients; bispecific trials.

NCCN · Category 2A

Subtypes & biomarkers

top
Biomarkers clinicians test
  • t (11;14) / cyclin D1 IHC
  • SOX11
  • MIPI and MIPI-c
  • Ki-67 (≥30% high risk)
  • TP53 mutation / del (17p)
  • Blastoid morphology
  • MRD (ctDNA/clonoSEQ, investigational)

Target prevalence in this cancer

History

9top
  1. 1992Cyclin D1 and t(11;14) define MCL

    Mantle cell lymphoma recognised as a distinct entity (REAL classification 1994).

  2. 2008MIPI prognostic index
  3. 2013Ibrutinib: first BTK inhibitor approved

    68% response in relapsed MCL; the first indication for any BTK inhibitor.

  4. 2017Acalabrutinib approved (ACE-LY-004)
  5. 2019Zanubrutinib approved
  6. 2020Brexucabtagene autoleucel (ZUMA-2)

    First CAR-T for MCL: 93% response after BTKi failure.

  7. 2023Pirtobrutinib approved; ibrutinib US MCL indication withdrawn
  8. 2024TRIANGLE and ECHO

    Ibrutinib replaces transplant in fit patients; acalabrutinib + BR improves PFS first line in older patients.

  9. 2026Sonrotoclax approved for relapsed MCL

Pipeline

6top

Open problems

  • TP53-mutant and blastoid MCL fail chemo-immunotherapy; need CAR-T or bispecific-based first-line trials.
  • MRD-guided treatment duration.
  • Whether CAR-T should precede pirtobrutinib or follow it.
  • Cost and access of indefinite BTK-inhibitor therapy.

Trials

top

Recruiting now (live from ClinicalTrials.gov)

Recruiting trials near you · live from ClinicalTrials.gov
Mantle cell lymphoma
condition: Mantle cell lymphoma
Open on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Country and place are remembered in this browser only. A postcode is sent to OpenStreetMap's Nominatim service to find coordinates when you press the button; nothing else leaves your device.

Expert centres

top
Where the expertise is

Centres linked to this cancer in OnCo

Seeking a second opinion: ask your oncologist for a referral to a high-volume centre; most accept records and pathology by mail or telehealth. In the US, use the NCI's Find a Cancer Center tool or the nonprofit Cancer Commons, which navigates options for advanced cancers at no cost.

Questions to ask

top
Bring to your appointment

Questions to ask your oncologist about Mantle cell lymphoma

Generated from this cancer's standard of care, biomarkers, and pipeline · 17 questions

Newly diagnosed

  1. What is my exact diagnosis, stage, and grade, and which tests established them?
    Why: Everything else follows from an accurate stage and subtype.
  2. Which biomarkers have been tested on my tumour (for example t/ cyclin D1 IHC, SOX11, MIPI and MIPI-c, Ki-67, TP53 mutation / del), and what were the results?
    Why: These results decide eligibility for targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and trials.
  3. Which subtype is my cancer, and does that change the recommended treatment?
    Why: Recognised subtypes for this cancer include Classical nodal MCL, Leukaemic non-nodal MCL, Blastoid / pleomorphic variant.
  4. Is germline (inherited) genetic testing recommended for me or my family?
    Why: Inherited variants can change treatment and matter for relatives.

First line, fit (<65-70)

  1. For my situation (first line, fit (<65-70)), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Rituximab + high-dose cytarabine-based induction (e.g. R-CHOP/R-DHAP or Nordic) with ibrutinib and 2 years ibrutinib maintenance; autologous transplant no longer adds benefit when ibrutinib is used (TRIANGLE).
  2. Am I a candidate for Rituximab, Ibrutinib, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

First line, older or unfit

  1. For my situation (first line, older or unfit), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Bendamustine-rituximab + acalabrutinib (ECHO, approved 2025) or BR alone with rituximab maintenance; R-CHOP alternative.
  2. Am I a candidate for Bendamustine, Rituximab, Acalabrutinib, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Relapsed, BTKi-naive

  1. For my situation (relapsed, btki-naive), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Covalent BTK inhibitor (acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib; ibrutinib ex-US) ± venetoclax (SYMPATICO).
  2. Am I a candidate for Acalabrutinib, Zanubrutinib, Ibrutinib or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Relapsed after BTKi

  1. For my situation (relapsed after btki), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?
    Why: Guideline options include: Brexucabtagene or lisocabtagene CAR-T; pirtobrutinib; sonrotoclax (2026); allogeneic HSCT in selected patients; bispecific trials.
  2. Am I a candidate for Brexucabtagene autoleucel, Lisocabtagene maraleucel, Pirtobrutinib or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?
    Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.

Any stage

  1. Are there clinical trials I could join, for example of Sonrotoclax, Glofitamab, Pirtobrutinib, Venetoclax?
    Why: Trials are how the next standard of care is set; asking early keeps options open.
  2. Would a second opinion at a high-volume centre change anything, and can you help arrange it?
    Why: Rare or high-stakes decisions benefit from a centre that treats many similar patients.
  3. What supportive care (symptom control, nutrition, exercise, mental health, financial help) is available from the start?
    Why: Supportive care improves quality of life and helps patients complete treatment.
  4. I read that “TP53-mutant and blastoid MCL fail chemo-immunotherapy; need CAR-T or bispecific-based first-line trials”. How does that affect my plan?
    Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.
  5. I read that “MRD-guided treatment duration”. How does that affect my plan?
    Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.

Print this page for your appointment (your browser's print command). These prompts are for discussion; your clinical team knows your case.

Everything relevant

48top

Direct links plus the targets, companies, and technologies of this cancer's products.

technologies

8

targets

7

drugs

14

companies

10

pathways

3

terms

3

collections

2

key papers

1

Key papers

1top

Latest papers

top
Latest papers · live from Europe PMC
Open in Europe PMC

Query for this cancer: (TITLE:"Mantle cell lymphoma" OR ABSTRACT:"Mantle cell lymphoma") AND (treatment OR therapy OR trial OR survival OR diagnosis). Results are unfiltered search hits about Mantle cell lymphoma, not a curated reading list.

Connected

42top

technologies

6

targets

7

drugs

14

companies

6

pathways

3

terms

3

collections

2

key papers

1