OnCo
roadmapsRoadmap

Diagnostics roadmap: stains → gene panels → blood tests that decide treatment

Cancer diagnosis moved from what a tumour looks like under a microscope to what is driving it, and now to reading it from a blood sample. The next step is tests that tell the doctor what to do, not only what is there.

Story

top
1940s-1990shistoricstep 1 of 7

Morphology, stains and the first companion test

Haematoxylin and eosin, then immunohistochemistry and FISH, defined cancer by appearance and a handful of proteins. HER2 testing approved alongside trastuzumab in 1998 created the companion diagnostic: a test whose result is the gate to a drug. Every targeted therapy since has been launched with one.

2000s-2010shistoricstep 2 of 7

Single-gene tests and gene-expression signatures

PCR kits for EGFR, KRAS and BRAF matched the first kinase inhibitors to the right patients; the cobas EGFR test became the first blood-based companion diagnostic. Gene-expression signatures did the opposite job, identifying who could safely skip treatment: TAILORx (2018) and RxPONDER showed that most women with early hormone-positive breast cancer and a low Oncotype DX score gain nothing from chemotherapy.

2017-2022currentstep 3 of 7

Comprehensive profiling and tumour-agnostic biomarkers

Sequencing hundreds of genes at once (FoundationOne CDx, TruSight Oncology, Tempus xT) replaced serial single-gene tests, and the biomarker began to matter more than the organ: pembrolizumab for any mismatch-repair-deficient tumour and larotrectinib for any NTRK fusion made the test the indication. Guardant360 CDx did the same from blood. Variant knowledgebases and molecular tumour boards turned raw variants into decisions.

technologyStandard of care
Comprehensive genomic profiling

Sequencing hundreds of cancer genes at once from a biopsy to find the mutations a drug can target.

drugApproved
FoundationOne CDx / Liquid CDx

The FDA-approved tissue (324 genes) and blood genomic tests that serve as companion diagnostics for dozens of drugs.

drugApproved
TruSight Oncology Comprehensive

A large gene panel hospitals can run themselves, approved by the FDA in 2024 as a companion diagnostic for the tumour-agnostic drug larotrectinib.

drugApproved
Tempus xT CDx

Tempus's tumour-and-normal gene panel, FDA-approved in 2023 as a companion test for EGFR antibodies in bowel cancer.

drugApproved
Guardant360 CDx

A blood test that reads a tumour's mutations without a tissue biopsy and is the FDA-approved gateway to several targeted drugs.

technologyStandard of care
MSI and mismatch-repair testing

Tests that show whether a tumour has lost its DNA spell-checker; if so, immunotherapy works unusually well and an inherited syndrome may be present.

technologyEstablished
Tumour mutational burden testing

Counting how many mutations a tumour carries per stretch of DNA; heavily mutated tumours are more likely to respond to immunotherapy.

technologyStandard of care
HRD & BRCA testing

Tests that reveal whether a tumour has a broken DNA repair system, which predicts response to PARP inhibitors and platinum.

technologyEstablished
Cancer variant knowledgebases and molecular tumour boards

Curated databases that say what each mutation means for treatment, and the expert meetings that use them to decide on therapy.

technologyStandard of care
Multidisciplinary tumour boards

Regular meetings where surgeons, oncologists, radiologists, pathologists and others review each patient's case together and agree a plan; mandatory in many countries and associated with more guideline-concordant care.

term
Tumour-agnostic (tissue-agnostic) approval

A tumour-agnostic approval lets a drug be used for any cancer carrying a specific molecular feature, regardless of where it started.

2022-2026currentstep 4 of 7

Blood tests that change treatment in randomised trials

Molecular residual disease testing crossed from prognosis to action. DYNAMIC (2022) halved adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer with no loss of recurrence-free survival; CIRCULATE-Japan runs the same question at national scale; SERENA-6 switched endocrine therapy when an ESR1 mutation appeared in blood before a scan showed progression; and IMvigor011 delivered the first ctDNA-guided approval, in bladder cancer, in 2026. Tumour-informed (Signatera, RaDaR) and tumour-naive (Guardant Reveal) assays now compete on sensitivity and turnaround.

technologyEstablished
MRD / molecular residual disease testing

An ultra-sensitive blood test after surgery that detects leftover cancer months before a scan would.

technologyStandard of care
Liquid biopsy (ctDNA)

A blood test that reads fragments of DNA shed by the tumour, so you can genotype or monitor cancer without a needle in the tumour.

trialPositive
DYNAMIC

Showed that a blood test can safely halve the number of colon cancer patients given chemotherapy after surgery.

trialActive
CIRCULATE-Japan (GALAXY / VEGA / ALTAIR)

Japan's national programme tests whether a blood test after surgery should decide who gets chemotherapy, and whether treating a positive test early helps.

trialPositive
SERENA-6

The first trial to change treatment because of a blood test rather than a scan: switching to camizestrant when an ESR1 mutation appeared in the blood delayed progression by seven months.

trialPositive
IMvigor011

The first trial to use a blood test for leftover cancer to decide who gets immunotherapy, and it worked.

drugEstablished
Signatera

The most widely used blood test for detecting leftover cancer after surgery, personalised to each patient's tumour mutations.

drugEstablished
RaDaR

NeoGenomics' personalised blood test for tiny amounts of leftover cancer, tracking up to 48 mutations from the patient's own tumour.

drugEstablished
Guardant Reveal

A blood test for leftover cancer after surgery that needs no tumour sample, so results come faster than tumour-informed tests.

trialActive
INSIGHT

A blood-test-selected trial testing whether matching the drug to the specific resistance mutation beats the standard second-line drug.

2024-2028emergingstep 5 of 7

Slides become data

Whole-slide scanning made the microscope image computable, and foundation models trained on millions of slides now predict biomarkers, recurrence risk and treatment benefit from a routine stain. ArteraAI Prostate (2025) was the first AI test cleared to predict benefit from a therapy; ArteraAI Breast followed in 2026. MASAI showed in a randomised screening trial that AI reading finds more cancers with less radiologist workload. The open question is prospective proof that AI-derived biomarkers should change treatment, and a regulatory route for models that keep learning.

technologyEstablished
Digital pathology & AI

Scanning microscope slides and letting software measure things a pathologist cannot see, including predictions of who will benefit from a treatment.

technologyEmerging
Pathology & radiology foundation models

Very large AI models trained on millions of slides or scans that can be adapted to almost any diagnostic question.

technologyEstablished
Whole-slide scanners and image management

The scanners that turn glass slides into gigapixel images, and the software that stores and serves them, without which pathology AI cannot run.

technologyEmerging
Virchow / Virchow2 (Paige, MSK)

A pathology foundation model trained on millions of slides that can detect cancer and predict biomarkers from an ordinary H&E slide.

technologyEmerging
Prov-GigaPath (Microsoft, Providence)

An open pathology model trained on 1.3 billion image tiles from a US health system, modelling whole slides at gigapixel scale.

drugApproved
ArteraAI Prostate

The first AI tool cleared by the FDA to predict both prognosis and treatment benefit from a routine biopsy slide, in prostate cancer.

drugApproved
ArteraAI Breast

An FDA-cleared AI test (May 2026) that reads breast cancer slides to estimate recurrence risk in early hormone-positive disease.

trialPositive
MASAI (Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence)

The first randomised trial of AI in breast screening found more cancers and cut radiologists' reading work almost in half without more false alarms.

technologyEmerging
MUSK (Stanford, vision-language pathology)

A model that reads slides and clinical text together to predict who will respond to immunotherapy.

2027-2032emergingstep 6 of 7

Spatial, single-cell and protein layers guide the choice

Genotype explains which drug could work; architecture and phenotype may explain which one will. Spatial and single-cell profiling map where immune cells sit relative to tumour cells, proteomics measures the drug's actual target, long-read sequencing resolves rearrangements and methylation together, and near-continuous ctDNA sampling turns monitoring into a running signal. Each is a research tool today; the work of this era is showing that any of them changes an outcome when used to choose treatment.

What sets the pacecurrentstep 7 of 7

Validation, standardisation and payment

Tests that decide who gets a drug are still often validated retrospectively, run differently in different laboratories, and paid for only when they add treatment rather than remove it. The fixes on the table: pre-registration of biomarker studies, a national platform every ctDNA-positive patient can join, coverage-with-evidence for residual disease tests, universal sequencing that feeds a shared learning system, and a clear regulatory status for laboratory-developed tests.

bottleneck
Biomarkers are not validated or standardised

Tests that decide who gets a drug are often not validated prospectively and are measured differently in every lab.

bottleneck
Dormant cells and minimal residual disease

After a 'successful' treatment, cells can sleep for years then relapse. We can barely detect them and cannot target them.

bottleneck
Data silos

Records, scans, genomes and outcomes sit in separate systems that cannot talk. Every patient's experience is lost to the next.

bottleneck
Tumour heterogeneity and clonal evolution

A tumour is many tumours. Treatments that kill most cells leave the rest to grow back, changed.

idea
Pre-register biomarker validation studies the way trials are registered

Drug trials must be registered before they start so results cannot be hidden or reshaped. Studies that claim a biomarker predicts outcome should be registered too.

idea
A national platform trial that every ctDNA-positive patient can join

Blood tests can now find leftover cancer months before scans, but most patients who test positive have nothing to enrol in. One standing trial per country would fix that.

idea
Pay for residual disease tests only inside a trial or registry

Leftover-cancer blood tests are being sold faster than evidence that acting on them helps. Paying for them only when the result is recorded would generate the missing evidence.

idea
Universal tumour and germline sequencing at diagnosis feeding a shared learning system

Sequence every cancer at diagnosis, along with the patient's inherited genes, and pool the results with treatments and outcomes so every patient teaches the system how to treat the next.

term
FDA laboratory-developed test (LDT) rule

Most cancer tests in the US, including Galleri, Signatera and Oncotype DX, are 'lab-developed tests' overseen through lab standards rather than FDA approval; the FDA's 2024 attempt to change that was struck down in court in 2025.

technologyStandard of care
Reference laboratories and companion-diagnostic testing

The big labs that run most biomarker tests, and the reagent makers whose stains decide who gets a drug.