Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour
Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours divide fast enough to be called grade 3 yet still look and behave like their slower relatives rather than like neuroendocrine carcinoma. Recognised as separate since 2017, they keep the somatostatin receptor, respond less well to platinum chemotherapy, and in the NETTER-2 trial were among the first treated with lutetium-177 dotatate up front.
Overview
Until 2017 every neuroendocrine neoplasm with a Ki-67 above 20 percent was called neuroendocrine carcinoma and treated like small-cell lung cancer. Pathologists noticed that some of these tumours kept the organoid architecture, uniform nuclei and somatostatin receptor expression of well-differentiated tumours, and that their patients lived far longer than those with carcinoma. Multicentre series, notably Heetfeld and colleagues (2015), showed that these tumours, usually pancreatic and usually with a Ki-67 between 20 and 55 percent, responded poorly to platinum-etoposide but survived longer, and the NORDIC NEC series (2013) had already found that a Ki-67 below 55 percent predicted the same pattern. The WHO classified pancreatic NET G3 as a distinct entity in 2017 and extended it to the whole digestive system in 2019; molecularly these tumours carry the MEN1, DAXX and ATRX changes of neuroendocrine tumours and retain p53 and Rb, whereas carcinoma loses them, which is why p53 and Rb immunohistochemistry is now used when morphology is ambiguous.
Treatment evidence is thin because the entity is new and small. Capecitabine with temozolomide is the most used chemotherapy, on the basis of pancreatic tumour data from E2211 and retrospective grade 3 series, and everolimus and sunitinib are used with less evidence. Somatostatin receptor PET is usually positive, often with FDG avidity as well, and this dual pattern makes radioligand therapy plausible: NETTER-2 (Lancet 2024) was designed to include grade 3 tumours with a Ki-67 up to 55 percent alongside higher grade 2 tumours, and first-line lutetium-177 dotatate lengthened progression-free survival from 8.5 to 22.8 months across the 226 patients, the first randomised evidence in this group. COMPOSE randomises well-differentiated aggressive grade 2 and grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic tumours between 177Lu-edotreotide and CAPTEM, everolimus or FOLFOX, and is due to report in 2027.
The practical decisions are about tempo and receptor status. Tumours near the upper end of Ki-67, growing fast or losing receptor expression on PET are treated more like carcinoma with platinum-etoposide, while receptor-positive tumours with slower tempo are treated like grade 2 tumours with radioligand therapy or CAPTEM. Surgery and liver-directed therapy are used as for other well-differentiated tumours when disease is limited. Whether grade 3 tumours should be graded further, and where the Ki-67 line between tumour and carcinoma really lies, remain open.
State of the art
- The 2017 and 2019 WHO classifications turned a pathology observation into a treatable category and spared these patients platinum they did not benefit from.
- NETTER-2 supplied the first randomised evidence in grade 3 tumours and put radioligand therapy first line.
- p53 and Rb immunohistochemistry and dual-tracer PET give practical tools for the ambiguous case.
Red cards
From the labels and guidelines behind the standard of care. Your team's thresholds win.- Emergency services nowBleeding or bruising
Bleeding that will not stop, black or bloody stools, or unexplained bruising when platelets are expected to be low.
- Emergency services nowBone pain flare or fracture (radium-223)
Sudden severe bone pain, or back pain with weakness or numbness in the legs (possible spinal cord compression).
- Emergency services nowBowel perforation
Sudden severe abdominal pain, a hard or very tender abdomen, or abdominal pain with vomiting and fever. Boxed warning for gastrointestinal perforation on bevacizumab.
- Emergency services nowFainting or palpitations
Fainting, near-fainting, or an irregular or racing heartbeat; several kinase inhibitors prolong the QT interval and the labels require ECG and electrolyte monitoring.
- Check before combiningFood and drink: Everolimus
Avoid grapefruit. Live vaccines are contraindicated.
- Check before combiningFood and drink: Sunitinib
Avoid grapefruit.
See all on the product pages:177Lu-edotreotideCapecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM)EverolimusLutetium-177 dotatatePlatinum + etoposide (EP / CE)Sunitinib·Printable cards in the navigator
Anatomy and lymph node drainage
- Pancreatic head (most PDAC)
- Body and tail
- Ampulla
- Islets (pancreatic NET)
- Intrahepatic ducts
- Perihilar (Klatskin)
- Distal bile duct
- Gallbladder
- Nodes: peripancreatic
- Nodes: hepatic hilar
- Nodes: coeliac and superior mesenteric
Most pancreatic cancers arise in the head next to the bile duct, which is why jaundice is the presenting sign; bile duct cancers are named by where along the tree they sit.
- Pancreatic head (most PDAC)
- Body and tail
- Ampulla
- Islets (pancreatic NET)Grade 3 well-differentiated pancreatic NET (the commonest site) · Grade 3 well-differentiated small intestinal and other gastroenteropancreatic NET · Grade 2 to grade 3 progression within a known neuroendocrine tumour
- Intrahepatic ducts
- Perihilar (Klatskin)
- Distal bile duct
- Gallbladder
- peripancreatic
- hepatic hilar
- coeliac and superior mesenteric
Same organ: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Biliary tract cancer (cholangiocarcinoma), Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (perihilar and distal), Biliary tract cancer (all types), Neuroendocrine tumours, Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma, Gallbladder cancer, Ampullary cancer (ampulla of Vater)
A small fraction of neuroendocrine neoplasms, most often pancreatic; recognised as a separate entity by the WHO in 2017 for the pancreas and 2019 for the whole digestive system after series showed it outlives neuroendocrine carcinoma and responds less to platinum.
Cases by country
No country-level case numbers. This cancer is not mapped to a GLOBOCAN site.
One section per setting: the options named, what each is for, the trials behind them, the recorded trade-offs and the questions to ask.
Morphology, Ki-67 and p53 or Rb immunohistochemistry to separate grade 3 tumour from carcinoma; somatostatin receptor and FDG PET together.
Lutetium-177 dotatate first line for Ki-67 up to 55 percent (NETTER-2); somatostatin analogue alongside.
Capecitabine with temozolomide; everolimus or sunitinib for pancreatic tumours; platinum-etoposide for carcinoma-like tempo or Ki-67 near 55 percent.
COMPOSE: 177Lu-edotreotide against CAPTEM, everolimus or FOLFOX in aggressive grade 2 and grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic tumours.
Resection and liver-directed therapy as for other well-differentiated tumours.
Subtypes & biomarkers
top- Grade 3 well-differentiated pancreatic NET (the commonest site)
- Grade 3 well-differentiated small intestinal and other gastroenteropancreatic NET
- NET G3 with Ki-67 20 to 55 percent, somatostatin receptor-positive (radioligand candidates)
- NET G3 with high FDG avidity or falling receptor expression (carcinoma-like behaviour)
- Grade 2 to grade 3 progression within a known neuroendocrine tumour
- Ki-67 above 20 percent (usually 20 to 55 percent) with well-differentiated morphology
- Retained p53 and Rb by immunohistochemistry (abnormal in carcinoma)
- Somatostatin receptor PET, usually positive, with FDG PET for dual-tracer assessment
- Chromogranin A (monitoring)
- MEN1, DAXX and ATRX alterations (tumour lineage, research)
- MGMT status (CAPTEM response, investigational)
How often this target appears
- 2013NORDIC NEC: Ki-67 below 55 percent marks a less platinum-sensitive, longer-surviving group
- 2015Heetfeld and colleagues characterise well-differentiated grade 3 tumours as distinct from carcinoma
- 2017WHO classification of pancreatic tumours creates NET G3
- 2019WHO digestive system classification extends NET G3 to the whole gut
- 2021COMPOSE opens: 177Lu-edotreotide against chemotherapy or everolimus in aggressive grade 2 and grade 3 tumours
- 2024NETTER-2: first-line lutetium-177 dotatate in grade 2 to 3 tumours with Ki-67 up to 55 percent
Dated changes read from the records linked to this cancer: approvals, regulatory steps, reported trials, guideline versions and milestones. Newest first; no date is inferred.
All 8 changes by month →- 2026-09-17This recordGrade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumourFacts on this page last checked
When this page itself was last checked or edited.
- 2025Trial resultCOMPETECOMPETE reported
PFS 23.
- 2024MilestoneStudy to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lutathera in Patients With Grade 2 and Grade 3 Advanced GEP-NETNETTER-2: first-line lutetium-177 dotatate in grade 2 to 3 tumours with Ki-67 up to 55 percent
A milestone in how this cancer is treated.
- 2021MilestoneLutetium 177Lu-Edotreotide Versus Best Standard of Care in Well-differentiated Aggressive Grade-2 and Grade-3 GastroEnteroPancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) - COMPOSECOMPOSE opens: 177Lu-edotreotide against chemotherapy or everolimus in aggressive grade 2 and grade 3 tumours
A milestone in how this cancer is treated.
- 2019MilestoneNeuroendocrine tumour grade (Ki-67) and WHO classificationWHO digestive system classification extends NET G3 to the whole gut
A milestone in how this cancer is treated.
- 2017MilestoneNeuroendocrine tumour grade (Ki-67) and WHO classificationWHO classification of pancreatic tumours creates NET G3
A milestone in how this cancer is treated.
What is in development for Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour, drawn from the whole corpus: 4 items. Drugs are grouped by the most advanced trial phase they have reached anywhere; approved treatments sit under standard of care. Technologies are the methods being tested for this cancer, trials are the studies recorded here, and ideas are proposals not yet in a trial.
Drugs in phase 3 · 1
Trials under way · 2
- Lutetium 177Lu-Edotreotide Versus Best Standard of Care in Well-differentiated Aggressive Grade-2 and Grade-3 GastroEnteroPancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) - COMPOSE · phase 3 · ITM Solucin GmbH
- Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lutathera in Patients With Grade 2 and Grade 3 Advanced GEP-NET · phase 3 · Advanced Accelerator Applications
Ideas not yet in a trial · 1
Open problems and what is being done
The Ki-67 boundary between grade 3 tumour and carcinoma is not sharp, and some cases can only be settled by molecular testing.
No trial has been run in grade 3 tumours alone; NETTER-2 and COMPOSE mix them with grade 2.
Whether platinum-etoposide, CAPTEM or radioligand therapy should come first in the fastest grade 3 tumours is unknown.
Trials
topTrials recruiting now
Country and place are remembered in this browser only. A postcode is sent to OpenStreetMap's Nominatim service to find coordinates when you press the button; nothing else leaves your device.
Landmark trials
Expert centres
topExpert centres
Shanghai · hospital | China | none recorded | 0 | 2,872 | 31,534 | - | |
Rotterdam · cancer center | Netherlands | none recorded | 0 | 852 | 12,180 | - | |
| Switzerland | none recorded | 0 | 470 | 4,598 | - | ||
Munich · university | Germany | none recorded | 0 | 438 | 4,021 | - | |
Chandigarh · hospital | India | none recorded | 0 | 398 | 3,509 | - | |
São Paulo · cancer center | Brazil | none recorded | 0 | 352 | 2,396 | - | |
Uppsala · hospital | Sweden | none recorded | 0 | 211 | 1,236 | - | |
Madrid · research institute | Spain | none recorded | 0 | 203 | 3,502 | - | |
Rehovot · research institute | Israel | none recorded | 0 | 183 | 3,727 | - | |
Brno · cancer center | Czechia | none recorded | 0 | 155 | 1,946 | - | |
Porto Alegre · hospital | Brazil | none recorded | 0 | 131 | 1,978 | - | |
Bangkok · cancer center | Thailand | none recorded | 0 | 61 | 907 | - | |
Rome · cancer center | Italy | none recorded | 0 | 37 | 332 | - | |
Cambridge, MA · research institute | United States | 0 | 22 | 500 | - | ||
Philadelphia, PA · consortium | United States | none recorded | 0 | 15 | 142 | - |
These are the things we can measure; they are not a ranking of quality. Each column is a field on the institution record or a count over what OnCo has linked; a centre that treats many patients with Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour but is thinly recorded here will look small.
Not known: OnCo holds no case-volume or outcome figures for centres, so none are shown. Where a national audit or registry publishes them, the centre's page links to it. Default order: Newsweek rank, then trials for this cancer, then research output.
Questions to ask
topQuestions to ask your oncologist about Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour
Newly diagnosed
- What is my exact diagnosis, stage, and grade, and which tests established them?Why: Everything else follows from an accurate stage and subtype.
- Which biomarkers have been tested on my tumour (for example Ki-67 above 20 percentwith well-differentiated morphology, Retained p53 and Rb by immunohistochemistry, Somatostatin receptor PET, usually positive, with FDG PET for dual-tracer assessment, Chromogranin A, MEN1, DAXX and ATRX alterations), and what were the results?Why: These results decide eligibility for targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and trials.
- Which subtype is my cancer, and does that change the recommended treatment?Why: Recognised subtypes for this cancer include Grade 3 well-differentiated pancreatic NET, Grade 3 well-differentiated small intestinal and other gastroenteropancreatic NET, NET G3 with Ki-67 20 to 55 percent, somatostatin receptor-positive.
- Is germline (inherited) genetic testing recommended for me or my family?Why: Inherited variants can change treatment and matter for relatives.
Diagnosis
- For my situation (diagnosis), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: Morphology, Ki-67 and p53 or Rb immunohistochemistry to separate grade 3 tumour from carcinoma; somatostatin receptor and FDG PET together.
Advanced, somatostatin receptor-positive
- For my situation (advanced, somatostatin receptor-positive), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: Lutetium-177 dotatate first line for Ki-67 up to 55 percent (NETTER-2); somatostatin analogue alongside.
- Am I a candidate for Lutetium-177 dotatate, Somatostatin analogues (octreotide, lanreotide), and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
- How do the results of Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lutathera in Patients With Grade 2 and Grade 3 Advanced GEP-NET apply to someone like me?Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.
Advanced, shrinkage needed or receptor-negative
- For my situation (advanced, shrinkage needed or receptor-negative), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: Capecitabine with temozolomide; everolimus or sunitinib for pancreatic tumours; platinum-etoposide for carcinoma-like tempo or Ki-67 near 55 percent.
- Am I a candidate for Capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM), Everolimus, Sunitinib or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
Trials
- For my situation (trials), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: COMPOSE: 177Lu-edotreotide against CAPTEM, everolimus or FOLFOX in aggressive grade 2 and grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic tumours.
- Am I a candidate for 177Lu-edotreotide, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
- How do the results of Lutetium 177Lu-Edotreotide Versus Best Standard of Care in Well-differentiated Aggressive Grade-2 and Grade-3 GastroEnteroPancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) - COMPOSE apply to someone like me?Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.
Limited disease
- For my situation (limited disease), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: Resection and liver-directed therapy as for other well-differentiated tumours.
Any stage
- Are there clinical trials I could join, for example of Lutetium 177Lu-Edotreotide Versus Best Standard of Care in Well-differentiated Aggressive Grade-2 and Grade-3 GastroEnteroPancreatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs) - COMPOSE, 177Lu-edotreotide, Lutetium-177 dotatate, Capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM)?Why: Trials are how the next standard of care is set; asking early keeps options open.
- Would a second opinion at a high-volume centre change anything, and can you help arrange it?Why: Rare or high-stakes decisions benefit from a centre that treats many similar patients.
- What supportive care (symptom control, nutrition, exercise, mental health, financial help) is available from the start?Why: Supportive care improves quality of life and helps patients complete treatment.
- I read that “The Ki-67 boundary between grade 3 tumour and carcinoma is not sharp, and some cases can only be settled by molecular testing”. How does that affect my plan?Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.
- I read that “No trial has been run in grade 3 tumours alone; NETTER-2 and COMPOSE mix them with grade 2”. How does that affect my plan?Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.
Newly diagnosed? Read the first 60 days with Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour, then print the one-page appointment sheet with room for the answers.
Print this page for your appointment (your browser's print command). These prompts are for discussion; your clinical team knows your case.
Direct links plus the targets, companies, and technologies of this cancer's products.
technologies
12targets
7drugs
7companies
4terms
6trials
3ideas
1Latest papers
topQuery for this cancer: (TITLE:"Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour" OR ABSTRACT:"Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour" OR TITLE:"NET G3" OR ABSTRACT:"NET G3" OR TITLE:"Grade 3 NET" OR ABSTRACT:"Grade 3 NET" OR TITLE:"Well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumour" OR ABSTRACT:"Well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumour" OR TITLE:"High-grade well-differentiated NET" OR ABSTRACT:"High-grade well-differentiated NET") AND (treatment OR therapy OR trial OR survival OR diagnosis). Results are unfiltered search hits about Grade 3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour, not a curated reading list.
Similar pages
not linked directly; found by shared links- CancerPancreatic neuroendocrine tumours
Shares Chromogranin A, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lutathera in Patients With Grade 2 and Grade 3 Advanced GEP-NET, Neuroendocrine tumour grade (Ki-67) and WHO classification, COMPETE and the tags subtype-page, endocrine.
- CancerSmall intestinal neuroendocrine tumours
Shares Chromogranin A, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Lutathera in Patients With Grade 2 and Grade 3 Advanced GEP-NET, Neuroendocrine tumour grade (Ki-67) and WHO classification, COMPETE and the tags subtype-page, endocrine.
- CancerExtrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma
Shares Neuroendocrine tumour grade (Ki-67) and WHO classification, Tumour differentiation (well / moderately / poorly differentiated), Capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM), Platinum + etoposide (EP / CE) and the tags subtype-page, endocrine.
- CancerLung neuroendocrine tumours (typical and atypical carcinoid)
Shares Chromogranin A, Neuroendocrine tumour grade (Ki-67) and WHO classification, Capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM), Somatostatin analogues (octreotide, lanreotide) and the tags subtype-page, endocrine.
- CancerChromophobe renal cell carcinoma
Shares Sunitinib, Thermal ablation (RFA, microwave, cryo), Everolimus and the tag subtype-page.
- CancerNeuroendocrine and small-cell prostate cancer
Shares Platinum + etoposide (EP / CE), PET (positron emission tomography), TP53 and the tag subtype-page.
- CancerEarly hepatocellular carcinoma (BCLC 0 and A)
Shares Hepatectomy (liver resection), Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), Thermal ablation (RFA, microwave, cryo) and the tag subtype-page.
- CancerPapillary renal cell carcinoma
Shares Sunitinib, Thermal ablation (RFA, microwave, cryo) and the tag subtype-page.