Open questions
57 unresolved questions across 25 targets and 24 technologies. Each says why it is still open, what evidence would settle it, who has to act, and which trials, products and ideas in the corpus bear on it. Cancers carry their own open problems on their pages; this index covers the molecules and the methods.
57 questions
| What would answer it | Bears on it | Source | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Have AI-discovered oncology molecules improved clinical success rates, or only shortened the preclinical timeline? Technology: AI-driven drug & target discovery Several AI-derived molecules (HER2, CDK2/4, KRAS binders) are in phase 1 and structure models are now routine, but no AI-originated cancer drug has yet reported a positive randomised trial. | AI-driven drug & target discovery | Phase 2 and 3 results for AI-discovered molecules compared with matched conventional programmes, and public reporting of attrition by stage. | AlphaFold 3, Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (MIT, open), Chai-1 / Chai-2, Iambic Therapeutics, Isomorphic Labs, A virtual cancer cell that predicts wh… | AlphaFold 3, Nature 2024 | ||
Will fourth-generation ALK inhibitors extend the more than five-year progression-free survival seen with lorlatinib, or is lorlatinib the ceiling for on-target therapy? Target: ALK CROWN's five-year data made lorlatinib the first-line standard; resistance now runs through compound mutations and bypass pathways that neladalkib targets, but the incremental benefit after lorlatinib is unknown. | ALK | ALKOVE-1 and randomised post-lorlatinib trials with resistance-mechanism stratification. | Lorlatinib, Neladalkib, CROWN, ALKOVE-1, CROWN: lorlatinib versus crizotinib as… | CROWN five-year update, J Clin Oncol 2024 | ||
Can off-the-shelf allogeneic CAR-T or CAR-NK products persist long enough to match autologous durability? Technology: Allogeneic (off-the-shelf) cell therapy Allogeneic products avoid manufacturing delay but are rejected within weeks unless the host is heavily lymphodepleted; response rates are comparable, durability is not. | Allogeneic (off-the-shelf) cell therapy | Randomised comparison of an allogeneic product against an approved autologous product with duration of response. | UCART19: the first gene-edited, donor-…, CAR-NK & CAR-macrophage, Qualify one iPSC master cell bank once…, Off-the-shelf natural killer cells to … | KarMMa-3, NEJM 2023 | ||
What determines payload resistance to topoisomerase-I ADCs, and can it be measured before choosing the next ADC? Technology: Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) TOP1 mutations, SLFN11 silencing and efflux pumps are described, but there is no clinical assay, and sequencing two TOP1 ADCs is now common practice without one. | Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) | Prospective biopsy studies at ADC progression correlating TOP1, SLFN11 and ABC-transporter status with response to the next ADC. | ADC sequencing, Topoisomerase-I inhibitors (and ADC pa…, Payload-class switching as the rule fo…, Efflux-agnostic therapy for mesenchyma…, Trastuzumab deruxtecan, Sacituzumab govitecan | DESTINY-Breast04, NEJM 2022 | ||
Why do deruxtecan ADCs cause interstitial lung disease, and can it be predicted or prevented? Technology: Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) ILD is the dose-limiting and occasionally fatal toxicity across HER2-, TROP2- and HER3-directed DXd ADCs, occurs in patients whose tumours do not express the target in lung, and has no validated predictor. | Antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) | Mechanistic studies in human lung tissue and a validated risk score from pooled trial data, tested prospectively. | Trastuzumab deruxtecan, Datopotamab deruxtecan, Patritumab deruxtecan, Topoisomerase-I inhibitors (and ADC pa… | DESTINY-Breast03, NEJM 2022 | ||
Does B7-H3 expression predict benefit from ifinatamab deruxtecan in small-cell lung cancer and prostate cancer, or is it another ADC given without a biomarker? Target: B7-H3 B7-H3 is broadly expressed with low normal-tissue expression, and early single-arm data are promising, but no threshold has been validated and payload resistance from prior topotecan or lurbinectedin is plausible. | B7-H3 | IDeate-Lung02 with prospective B7-H3 IHC analysis and payload-resistance biomarkers. | Ifinatamab deruxtecan, IDeate-Lung02, Re-map the tumour's surface proteins b… | IDeate-Lung02 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Is fixed-duration venetoclax-based therapy curative for a subset of CLL, and who needs retreatment? Target: BCL-2 CLL14 and AMPLIFY show long treatment-free remissions after one or two years; measurable-residual-disease kinetics predict relapse but retreatment strategies and the role of newer BCL2 inhibitors are unsettled. | BCL-2 | Long-term follow-up with MRD-guided retreatment trials and comparison of sonrotoclax with venetoclax. | Venetoclax, Sonrotoclax, CLL14, AMPLIFY, CELESTIAL-TNCLL, CLL14: one year of venetoclax plus obi… | CLL14, NEJM 2019 | ||
In what order should BCMA CAR-T, BCMA bispecifics and GPRC5D-directed therapy be given, and does antigen loss after one preclude the next? Target: BCMA CARTITUDE-4 and MajesTEC data cover single lines; biallelic TNFRSF17 loss after bispecifics is described and T-cell fitness falls with each line, so sequencing changes outcomes in ways no trial has compared. | BCMA | Randomised sequencing trials and registries capturing BCMA and GPRC5D expression and T-cell fitness at each switch. | Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, Teclistamab, Talquetamab, Elranatamab, CARTITUDE-4, MajesTEC-3 | CARTITUDE-4, NEJM 2023 | ||
Does hitting two antigens with one ADC add efficacy or only widen the eligible population? Technology: Bispecific ADC Izalontamab brengitecan (EGFR x HER3) shows high response rates in EGFR-mutant lung and oesophageal cancer, but no trial isolates the contribution of the second arm from payload potency. | Bispecific ADC | Randomised trials against a matched monospecific ADC with the same payload, and biomarker analyses of dual-antigen expression. | Izalontamab brengitecan, BL-B01D1-307, PANKU-Esophagus01 (BL-B01D1-305), Two-target antibody drugs to close the… | BL-B01D1-307 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Does BREAKWATER's first-line encorafenib plus cetuximab plus chemotherapy improve overall survival enough to displace chemotherapy plus bevacizumab for every BRAF V600E colorectal patient? Target: BRAF BREAKWATER showed higher response and progression-free survival; overall survival maturity, the role of the chemotherapy backbone, and MSI-high BRAF patients (who may do better with immunotherapy) remain open. | BRAF | Mature overall survival, MSI-stratified analyses, and a comparison with immunotherapy in MSI-high BRAF-mutant disease. | Encorafenib, Cetuximab, BREAKWATER, BREAKWATER: encorafenib plus cetuximab…, CheckMate 8HW | BREAKWATER (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Should BRCA reversion mutations detected in ctDNA change treatment before radiographic progression on a PARP inhibitor? Target: BRCA1 / BRCA2 (HRD) Reversions restore homologous recombination and predict PARP-inhibitor and platinum failure, and they are detectable in plasma, but no trial has switched therapy on that signal alone. | BRCA1 / BRCA2 (HRD) | A ctDNA-guided switch trial (reversion detected: switch to a non-DDR agent versus continue) with progression-free survival. | Olaparib, Niraparib, SOLO-1, PAOLA-1 / ENGOT-ov25, Liquid biopsy (ctDNA), Mirvetuximab soravtansine | SOLO-1 seven-year overall survival, J Clin Oncol 2023 | ||
Do BTK degraders outperform non-covalent inhibitors once C481S, T474I or L528W mutations have appeared, and could they replace inhibitors in front line? Target: BTK (Bruton tyrosine kinase) Pirtobrutinib is active against C481S but selects kinase-dead L528W; degraders such as BGB-16673 remove the scaffold and are active preclinically against every known mutation, with early clinical responses. | BTK (Bruton tyrosine kinase) | CaDAnCe-304 (degrader versus pirtobrutinib) and front-line trials with fixed-duration combinations. | BGB-16673, Pirtobrutinib, CaDAnCe-304, BRUIN CLL-321, BTK degraders to pre-empt resistance i… | Woyach et al., NEJM 2014 | ||
Can point-of-care or non-viral manufacturing bring autologous CAR-T below the cost of a year of bispecific antibody therapy? Technology: CAR-T cell therapy List prices and vein-to-vein times keep CAR-T from most eligible patients worldwide; academic point-of-care programmes (Spain, India, Brazil) report far lower costs but are outside the regulatory mainstream. | CAR-T cell therapy | Regulatory acceptance of decentralised comparability standards and published cost-per-remission from academic manufacturing programmes. | Hospital-based CAR-T manufacturing at …, Hospital-made CAR-T under one shared r…, Non-viral CAR-T (transposon or CRISPR …, Non-profit, open-licence lentiviral ve… | ZUMA-7, NEJM 2022 | ||
What is missing for CAR-T to work in solid tumours: the antigen, trafficking, persistence in a suppressive microenvironment, or all three? Technology: CAR-T cell therapy Approvals remain confined to B-cell and plasma-cell malignancies; solid-tumour responses (GD2 in neuroblastoma, CLDN18.2 in gastric cancer) are real but rarely durable. | CAR-T cell therapy | Randomised or well-controlled trials of armoured or logic-gated CARs with serial biopsies showing infiltration, persistence and antigen status. | Armoured, logic-gated & next-gen CARs, Satricabtagene autoleucel, GD2-CART01 (Bambino Gesù phase 1/2), In vivo CAR-T against solid-tumour ant…, Regionally delivered mesothelin CAR-T …, Deliver CAR-T cells straight into the … | ELIANA, NEJM 2018 | ||
Can in vivo CAR-T (lentiviral or mRNA delivery of the CAR to the patient's own T cells) match ex vivo products in B-cell malignancies? Target: CD19 Manufacturing cost, slot limits and vein-to-vein time are the main barriers to CD19 CAR-T access; in vivo approaches remove them but first-in-human data are only now emerging. | CD19 | Phase 1/2 data showing comparable expansion, persistence and complete-response rates, then a randomised comparison with an approved product. | In vivo CAR-T, Axicabtagene ciloleucel, In vivo CAR-T against solid-tumour ant…, In vivo CAR-T as a vial on the shelf: …, In vivo CAR-T manufactured and priced … | ZUMA-1, NEJM 2017 | ||
After progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor, does continuing CDK4/6 inhibition with a new endocrine partner beat switching to a targeted or antibody-drug conjugate approach? Target: CDK4/6 postMONARCH showed modest benefit from continuing abemaciclib; resistance runs through RB1 loss, cyclin E and PI3K activation, and genotype-directed options (capivasertib, inavolisib, oral SERDs) compete for the same slot. | CDK4/6 | Genotype-stratified randomised trials at CDK4/6 progression comparing continuation, PI3K/AKT-directed therapy, oral SERDs and ADCs. | Abemaciclib, postMONARCH, Capivasertib, Inavolisib, Elacestrant, CDK4-selective inhibitors as the new f… | postMONARCH (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Should CLDN18.2 be attacked with an antibody plus chemotherapy, an ADC, or CAR-T, and at what expression threshold? Target: Claudin 18.2 Zolbetuximab needs at least 75% moderate-to-strong staining; ADCs such as CMG901 and the Chinese-approved satri-cel appear active at lower expression, but no trial compares modalities or thresholds. | Claudin 18.2 | Randomised trials in CLDN18.2-positive gastric cancer with stratification by expression level, and a harmonised IHC assay across modalities. | Zolbetuximab, Sonesitatug vedotin, Satricabtagene autoleucel, SPOTLIGHT & GLOW, CLARITY-Gastric 01, Biomarker-directed first-line quadrupl… | CLARITY-Gastric 01 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Does comprehensive genomic profiling for every advanced-cancer patient improve survival at the population level, and who pays for the negative results? Technology: Comprehensive genomic profiling Guidelines recommend broad panels in lung and other cancers; uptake is uneven, most reports find no actionable driver, and randomised evidence of survival benefit from profiling itself is thin. | Comprehensive genomic profiling | Pragmatic randomised or registry-based studies of profiling strategies with survival and cost, and reimbursement models covering the whole pathway. | FoundationOne CDx / Liquid CDx, A fixed share of trial-group funding f…, A DRUP-style protocol for off-label ge… | Vogelstein et al., Science 2013 | ||
Can genome-wide dependency maps in cell lines be made to predict dependencies in patients' tumours, where the microenvironment and immune system are present? Technology: CRISPR functional genomics DepMap has screened more than 1,000 lines and found many context-specific dependencies, but in vivo and organoid screens often disagree with plastic dishes, and few hits have reached the clinic. | CRISPR functional genomics | Matched in vitro, organoid and in vivo screens with clinical validation of predicted dependencies (for example PRMT5 in MTAP-deleted tumours). | DepMap (Cancer Dependency Map), PRMT5 (MTAP-deleted cancers), Synthetic lethality approaches, A synthetic lethality map for every ca…, A pre-competitive consortium to valida…, An open atlas of collateral sensitivit… | Tsherniak et al., Cell 2017 (DepMap) | ||
Does adding tarlatamab to first-line chemo-immunotherapy in small-cell lung cancer improve survival, and can DLL3 expression or subtype select patients? Target: DLL3 DeLLphi-304 proved second-line benefit; DeLLphi-305 tests first-line maintenance with durvalumab. DLL3 is not tested before treatment, yet expression varies by ASCL1 subtype and falls with plasticity. | DLL3 | DeLLphi-305 overall survival with subtype and DLL3 IHC analysed prospectively. | Tarlatamab, DeLLphi-304, DeLLphi-305, DeLLphi-301: tarlatamab, a DLL3-target…, Subtype-directed therapy for SCLC (ASC… | DeLLphi-301, NEJM 2023 | ||
Can two payloads on one antibody be dosed to full effect, or does combined toxicity force each below its active dose? Technology: Dual-payload ADC Dual-payload ADCs aim to pre-empt payload resistance; preclinical data are encouraging but the first clinical programmes must show that the therapeutic window is not simply halved. | Dual-payload ADC | Phase 1 dose-finding with pharmacodynamic evidence that both payloads reach active tumour concentrations at tolerable doses. | Dual-payload ADCs in first line to pre…, Payload-class switching as the rule fo… | Dumontet et al., Nat Rev Drug Discov 2023 (ADC design review) | ||
Which agent should follow osimertinib when C797S emerges: a fourth-generation TKI, amivantamab-based therapy, or an ADC that ignores genotype? Target: EGFR C797S removes the covalent anchor of every third-generation TKI. Allosteric fourth-generation inhibitors exist only in early trials, while ADCs and bispecifics work regardless of the mutation but carry different toxicities. | EGFR | A randomised comparison at osimertinib progression stratified by resistance mechanism (C797S, MET amplification, transformation), with biopsy or ctDNA at entry. | Osimertinib, Amivantamab, Patritumab deruxtecan, Datopotamab deruxtecan, Izalontamab brengitecan, TROPION-Lung05 | FLAURA2, NEJM 2023 | ||
Which patients need intensified first-line therapy (osimertinib plus chemotherapy, or amivantamab plus lazertinib) and which are well served by osimertinib alone? Target: EGFR FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA improve progression-free survival at the price of toxicity, and subgroup signals (brain metastases, TP53 co-mutation, detectable ctDNA) suggest the benefit is not uniform. | EGFR | Prospective ctDNA- or co-mutation-stratified trials, or individual-patient meta-analysis of FLAURA2 and MARIPOSA, showing who gains overall survival. | FLAURA2, MARIPOSA, MARIPOSA: amivantamab plus lazertinib …, ctDNA-guided dose holidays for lung ca… | MARIPOSA, NEJM 2024 | ||
Does switching to an oral SERD when ESR1 mutations first appear in ctDNA, before progression, improve overall survival? Target: Estrogen receptor (ERα) SERENA-6 showed longer progression-free survival with an early camizestrant switch, but overall survival and quality-of-life benefit are unproven and the strategy requires serial ctDNA testing. | Estrogen receptor (ERα) | Mature overall survival from SERENA-6 and replication with other SERDs or degraders; health-economic analysis of serial ctDNA. | Camizestrant, Elacestrant, Vepdegestrant, Imlunestrant, SERENA-6, EMERALD | SERENA-6 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Can FGFR2-selective inhibitors overcome the polyclonal kinase-domain mutations that end responses to pemigatinib and futibatinib? Target: FGFR2 Resistance in cholangiocarcinoma is polyclonal (N550, V565, E566, L618) and varies between lesions; covalent and next-generation FGFR2-selective agents cover subsets, and hyperphosphataemia from FGFR1 limits dosing of pan-FGFR drugs. | FGFR2 | Trials of FGFR2-selective inhibitors after FGFR-inhibitor progression with ctDNA-defined resistance profiles. | Pemigatinib, Futibatinib, Tinengotinib, FIRST-308, ctDNA-guided switching among FGFR inhi… | Goyal et al., Cancer Discov 2017 | ||
Does the FLASH effect (normal-tissue sparing at ultra-high dose rate) hold in people at curative doses? Technology: FLASH radiotherapy The effect is robust in animals; first-in-human studies used palliative bone metastases with electrons or protons, and the mechanism (oxygen depletion, radical recombination) is unsettled. | FLASH radiotherapy | Randomised FLASH-versus-conventional trials at curative dose with normal-tissue toxicity as the primary endpoint. | Proton therapy, A coordinated FLASH radiotherapy evide…, Compact FLASH and proton systems at th… | Favaudon et al., Sci Transl Med 2014 | ||
Can folate-receptor-alpha ADCs work below the 75% high-expression cut-off used for mirvetuximab, and in platinum-sensitive disease? Target: Folate receptor alpha MIRASOL enrolled only FRalpha-high platinum-resistant patients; newer FRalpha ADCs with topoisomerase payloads (rinatabart sesutecan, luveltamab tazevibulin) claim activity at lower expression but lack randomised data. | Folate receptor alpha | Randomised trials in FRalpha-medium and platinum-sensitive populations with a standardised FRalpha assay. | Mirvetuximab soravtansine, Rinatabart sesutecan, Luveltamab tazevibulin, MIRASOL / GOG-3045, RAINFOL-01 (Rina-S), Sequence folate-receptor ADCs by paylo… | MIRASOL (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
After trastuzumab deruxtecan, does a second HER2-directed ADC with a different payload work, or is payload resistance shared? Target: HER2 Resistance to topoisomerase-I payloads (TOP1 mutation, SLFN11 loss, efflux) is target-independent, so a second TOP1 ADC often fails; whether switching payload class restores benefit has not been tested prospectively. | HER2 | Randomised or well-controlled sequencing studies with pre-treatment biopsies characterising TOP1, SLFN11 and HER2 status. | Trastuzumab deruxtecan, Trastuzumab emtansine, Trastuzumab rezetecan, Payload-class switching as the rule fo…, Dual-payload ADCs in first line to pre…, ADC sequencing | DESTINY-Breast03, NEJM 2022 | ||
How should pathologists reliably separate HER2-low and HER2-ultralow from HER2-zero when the assays were designed to find HER2-high? Target: HER2 DESTINY-Breast04 and 06 made IHC 1+ and faint IHC 0 staining actionable, yet inter-observer agreement at the low end is poor and the antibodies, controls and cut-offs were validated for amplification. | HER2 | Ring studies with reference materials at the low end, AI-assisted scoring validated against trial outcomes, and label language tied to a reproducible assay. | Trastuzumab deruxtecan, DESTINY-Breast04, DESTINY-Breast06, DESTINY-Breast04: trastuzumab deruxtec…, AI quantification of HER2-low and HER2…, Calibrated reference slides so every l… | DESTINY-Breast04, NEJM 2022 | ||
Should homologous-recombination deficiency be measured as a genomic scar (past history) or as current repair function? Technology: HRD & BRCA testing Scar assays (myChoice GIS, HRDetect) predicted PARP-inhibitor benefit in PAOLA-1 but stay positive after resistance develops; functional assays (RAD51 foci) may track current status but are not standardised. | HRD & BRCA testing | Prospective comparison of scar and functional HRD assays against PARP-inhibitor outcomes, including after prior platinum. | PAOLA-1 / ENGOT-ov25, PAOLA-1: olaparib added to bevacizumab…, Olaparib, Niraparib, A functional test for homologous recom… | PAOLA-1, NEJM 2019 | ||
When should vorasidenib be started in IDH-mutant glioma, and can it delay or replace radiotherapy and chemotherapy? Target: IDH1 / IDH2 INDIGO enrolled grade 2 patients after surgery only; whether IDH inhibition helps after radiotherapy, in grade 3 disease, or as a way to defer radiotherapy-related cognitive harm is untested. | IDH1 / IDH2 | Trials in grade 3 and post-radiotherapy settings, and a comparison of early vorasidenib versus standard chemoradiotherapy with cognitive endpoints. | Vorasidenib, INDIGO, INDIGO: vorasidenib, the first targete…, Group trials by broken mechanism, not … | INDIGO, NEJM 2023 | ||
How should regulators assess integration, off-target transduction and germline risk for in vivo CAR delivery vectors? Technology: In vivo CAR-T In vivo lentiviral and LNP-mRNA CAR approaches transduce cells inside the patient, so the safety framework built for ex vivo manufacturing (release testing, vector copy number per product) does not apply directly. | In vivo CAR-T | Regulatory guidance and first-in-human integration-site and biodistribution data made public. | In vivo CAR-T, In vivo CAR-T as a vial on the shelf: …, In vivo CAR-T against solid-tumour ant… | UCART19, Lancet 2020 | ||
Can shared-antigen KRAS vaccines prevent relapse after surgery in pancreatic and colorectal cancer? Target: KRAS Mutant KRAS peptides are public neoantigens present in most pancreatic cancers, but AMPLIFY-7P missed its endpoint and it is unclear whether T-cell responses translate into fewer relapses. | KRAS | Randomised relapse-free-survival data for a KRAS vaccine, with ctDNA clearance as an early read, in resected patients with minimal residual disease. | ELI-002 7P, AMPLIFY-7P, Off-the-shelf KRAS vaccines after panc…, Off-the-shelf cancer vaccines | AMPLIFY-7P (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Does blocking the adaptive receptor feedback up front (EGFR, SHP2 or SOS1 co-inhibition) beat sequencing after progression? Target: KRAS Relief of ERK feedback re-activates receptors within hours of RAS inhibition; CodeBreaK 300 showed EGFR co-blockade helps in colorectal cancer, but whether that generalises to lung cancer and to SHP2 or SOS1 combinations is open. | KRAS | Phase 3 comparisons of first-line combinations against single-agent inhibitor followed by combination at progression, with ctDNA to time the switch. | CodeBreaK 300, CodeBreaK 300: sotorasib plus panitumu…, Add the second drug on day one when th…, Sotorasib, Adagrasib | CodeBreaK 300, NEJM 2023 | ||
Will KRAS G12D and pan-RAS(ON) inhibitors improve survival in pancreatic cancer, where G12D dominates? Target: KRAS The covalent G12C chemistry does not transfer to G12D, and pancreatic tumours rewire quickly through receptor feedback. Daraxonrasib reached approval on RASolute 302 but durable benefit in first line and in the adjuvant setting is unproven. | KRAS | Randomised overall-survival data for pan-RAS(ON) or G12D-selective inhibitors in first-line and resected pancreatic cancer, with paired biopsies showing which bypass routes emerge. | Daraxonrasib, MRTX1133, Zoldonrasib, RASolute 302, RAS(ON) inhibitors to convert unresect…, Covalent chemistry for the RAS mutatio… | RASolute 302 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
How should ctDNA assays be standardised so that a result from one laboratory means the same as another's? Technology: Liquid biopsy (ctDNA) Tumour-informed and tumour-naive assays differ in sensitivity by an order of magnitude; reference materials and reporting standards are immature, and trial results are assay-specific. | Liquid biopsy (ctDNA) | Reference plasma panels, inter-laboratory ring trials and regulatory qualification of MRD as a drug-development tool. | Certified reference samples to benchma…, Formally qualify tumour-DNA blood test…, A clone report from blood at every tre… | GALAXY (CIRCULATE-Japan), Nat Med 2023 | ||
Do menin inhibitors added to induction chemotherapy or venetoclax-azacitidine improve survival in newly diagnosed NPM1-mutant and KMT2A-rearranged AML? Target: Menin Revumenib and ziftomenib were approved on single-arm relapsed data; MEN1 resistance mutations and differentiation syndrome are described, and front-line randomised trials are only now under way. | Menin | Randomised front-line trials with overall survival and measurable-residual-disease negativity, plus resistance-mutation surveillance. | Revumenib, Ziftomenib, AUGMENT-101, KOMET-001, AUGMENT-101: revumenib, the first meni…, Menin inhibitors for infant KMT2A-rear… | AUGMENT-101 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
What definition of MET amplification or overexpression should select patients for MET-directed drugs at EGFR-TKI progression? Target: MET Copy-number thresholds by FISH, NGS and IHC disagree; MARIPOSA showed amivantamab's benefit without MET selection, while MET TKI combinations depend on it. | MET | Harmonised MET assay validation against outcomes in a randomised trial at osimertinib progression. | Amivantamab, Capmatinib & tepotinib, Telisotuzumab vedotin, MARIPOSA, TeliMET NSCLC-01 | MARIPOSA, NEJM 2024 | ||
Does treating ctDNA-detected molecular residual disease improve survival, or only move the diagnosis of relapse earlier? Technology: MRD / molecular residual disease testing DYNAMIC showed ctDNA can safely de-escalate adjuvant chemotherapy and IMvigor011 showed benefit of atezolizumab in ctDNA-positive bladder cancer, but escalation on a positive result has not improved survival in most cancers yet. | MRD / molecular residual disease testing | Randomised MRD-escalation trials with overall survival in colorectal, breast and lung cancer. | Signatera, DYNAMIC, IMvigor011, CIRCULATE-Japan (GALAXY / VEGA / ALTAIR), DYNAMIC: a blood test safely halved ch…, ctDNA-triggered escalation in early TNBC | DYNAMIC, NEJM 2022 | ||
Do multi-cancer early detection blood tests reduce cancer deaths, and at what cost in false positives and workups? Technology: Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) PATHFINDER showed feasibility and NHS-Galleri is the first randomised trial, but stage shift is not proof of mortality benefit, and positive results need a resolution pathway. | Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) | NHS-Galleri and follow-on trials reporting late-stage incidence and cancer-specific mortality, with harm accounting. | Galleri, NHS-Galleri, PATHFINDER 2, PATHFINDER: the first prospective test…, A 28-day national pathway for people w…, A mandatory decision aid before any mu… | PATHFINDER, Lancet 2023 | ||
Can oncolytic viruses be delivered systemically and still reach tumours, or will they remain intratumoural agents? Technology: Oncolytic viruses Approved and late-stage products (T-VEC, cretostimogene, RP1) are injected into accessible lesions; neutralising antibodies and hepatic clearance limit intravenous use. | Oncolytic viruses | Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies of shielded or carrier-cell-delivered viruses with responses in non-injected visceral lesions. | Talimogene laherparepvec, Cretostimogene grenadenorepvec, Vusolimogene oderparepvec, BOND-003, Oncolytic viruses that make interleuki… | BOND-003 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Do pathology foundation models improve patient outcomes prospectively, or only benchmark scores on retrospective slides? Technology: Pathology & radiology foundation models Dozens of models report state-of-the-art on TCGA-derived tasks; almost none have prospective, multi-site validation with clinical endpoints, and scanner and site batch effects remain. | Pathology & radiology foundation models | Prospective trials of model-guided decisions (biomarker triage, treatment selection) with outcome endpoints and external validation registries. | UNI and CONCH (Harvard, Mahmood Lab), Virchow / Virchow2 (Paige, MSK), Prov-GigaPath (Microsoft, Providence), A registry of external validation data…, A dedicated fund for randomised trials…, A public registry of every AI model us… | UNI, Nature Medicine 2024 | ||
Can patient-derived organoid drug testing predict a person's response well enough to guide therapy, and fast enough to matter? Technology: Patient-derived organoids Retrospective concordance is high in colorectal and pancreatic cancer, but organoids take weeks, fail to grow in a third of cases, lack immune and stromal components, and no randomised trial has shown benefit. | Patient-derived organoids | Randomised organoid-guided versus standard therapy trials with response and survival, plus turnaround-time and success-rate reporting. | Functional (ex vivo) drug testing, Hold organoid drug tests to the same s…, Grow each trial patient's tumour as or…, A funded organoid and PDX panel as the…, Patient-derived organoids to pick ADC … | Vlachogiannis et al., Science 2018 | ||
For which cancers should neoadjuvant immunotherapy replace surgery-first, and can pathological response replace long-term endpoints? Target: PD-1 NADINA, CheckMate 816, NICHE-2 and KEYNOTE-522 show deep pathological responses, but regulators still want event-free or overall survival and surgeons want to know who can safely have less surgery. | PD-1 | Validation of pathological complete response as a surrogate across tumour types and de-escalation trials that omit or reduce surgery in complete responders. | NADINA, CheckMate 816, NICHE-2, KEYNOTE-522, NADINA: two doses of ipilimumab plus n…, CheckMate 816: three cycles of nivolum… | NADINA, NEJM 2024 | ||
How long should checkpoint inhibitors be given: two years, one year, or until a ctDNA or imaging signal says stop? Target: PD-1 Trials fixed two years by convention; long-term CheckMate 067 and KEYNOTE-006 data show durable remissions after stopping, and the cost and toxicity of unnecessary years are large. | PD-1 | Randomised stop-versus-continue trials with ctDNA-guided arms, powered for overall survival. | Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, CheckMate 067, KEYNOTE-006, Randomised trials of stopping immunoth…, Extended-interval immunotherapy: give … | CheckMate 067 ten-year follow-up, NEJM 2025 | ||
What actually turns an immune-desert tumour into one that responds to PD-1 blockade? Target: PD-1 Most patients have primary resistance: no T-cell infiltrate or T cells excluded by stroma. Radiation, oncolytic viruses, ADCs and vaccines each prime in some models, but no combination has produced a reliable conversion in people. | PD-1 | Randomised combination trials with mandatory on-treatment biopsies linking immune-infiltration change to survival, and mechanistic studies of exclusion drivers such as TGF-beta and CXCL12. | Hot vs cold tumours, Radiotherapy + immunotherapy, Oncolytic virus + PD-1 blockade, ADC + checkpoint inhibitor, What actually holds T cells at the tum…, Make every cold tumour hot: a coordina… | Topalian et al., NEJM 2012 | ||
Can PD-L1 scoring be harmonised across antibodies (22C3, SP263, 28-8, SP142) and cut-points (TPS, CPS, IC) so one test serves every drug? Target: PD-L1 Each drug was approved with its own assay and threshold; concordance is good for tumour-cell scoring but poor for immune-cell and combined scores, so patients are classified differently by which kit the lab bought. | PD-L1 | Cross-assay concordance studies tied to outcomes, digital calibration standards, and labels that accept validated equivalent assays. | Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Lock the biomarker cut-off before phas…, One digital PD-L1 scale that maps acro…, Drug labels must state which biomarker… | KEYNOTE-189, NEJM 2018 | ||
Will personalised neoantigen vaccines confirm their phase 2 melanoma benefit in phase 3, and can manufacturing time and cost fall enough for routine use? Technology: Personalised neoantigen (mRNA) vaccines KEYNOTE-942 showed fewer recurrences with intismeran plus pembrolizumab; phase 3 (INTerpath-001) is the test, and six-to-eight-week manufacturing per patient limits use in fast-moving cancers. | Personalised neoantigen (mRNA) vaccines | INTerpath-001 recurrence-free and overall survival, plus manufacturing turnaround and cost data. | Intismeran autogene, Autogene cevumeran, INTerpath-001 (V940-001), KEYNOTE-942: a personalised mRNA cance…, Rojas 2023: a personalised mRNA vaccin…, Personalised cancer vaccines at commod… | INTerpath-001 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Can degraders reach the transcription factors and scaffolds that inhibitors cannot, beyond the first approvals against oestrogen and androgen receptors? Technology: PROTACs & molecular glues (targeted protein degradation) Vepdegestrant showed degraders can match small-molecule antagonists; the promise is undruggable proteins (MYC, mutant p53, fusion transcription factors), where ligands for the target are the bottleneck. | PROTACs & molecular glues (targeted protein degradation) | Clinical proof of degradation and response for a transcription factor or scaffold with no prior inhibitor. | Vepdegestrant, VERITAC-2, BGB-16673, Degraders for the fusion proteins that…, Degrade the damaged p53 protein rather…, An open degrader consortium against ev… | Sakamoto et al., PNAS 2001 (PROTAC concept) | ||
For which adult cancers does proton therapy reduce toxicity or improve survival enough to justify its cost over modern photon radiotherapy? Technology: Proton therapy Dosimetric advantages are clear; randomised evidence in adults is limited to a few sites (oesophagus, head and neck, prostate under way), and payers differ widely in coverage. | Proton therapy | Completed randomised trials with patient-reported toxicity and cost-effectiveness, and coverage tied to their results. | IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), Pooled coverage-with-evidence for prot…, A national repository of radiotherapy … | Lin et al., J Clin Oncol 2020 (oesophageal proton versus IMRT) | ||
Should PSMA radioligand therapy move to hormone-sensitive disease, and is an alpha emitter better than lutetium-177? Target: PSMA VISION and PSMAfore established lutetium-177 PSMA-617 late in the disease; PSMAddition tests it in hormone-sensitive disease and actinium-225 programmes report deeper responses with salivary toxicity, but head-to-head data are absent. | PSMA | Randomised trials of lutetium versus actinium PSMA ligands and of earlier use with overall survival, quality of life and dosimetry. | Lutetium-177 vipivotide tetraxetan, Actinium-225 PSMA agents, VISION, PSMAddition, PSMAfore, AlphaBreak (FPI-2265) & AcTION (225Ac-… | VISION, NEJM 2021 | ||
Should radioligand therapy be dosed by individual dosimetry rather than fixed activity? Technology: Radioligand therapy (beta emitters) Every approved radioligand is given as a fixed activity; dosimetry studies show several-fold variation in tumour and kidney absorbed dose, but no randomised trial has shown that personalised dosing improves outcomes. | Radioligand therapy (beta emitters) | A randomised comparison of dosimetry-guided versus fixed-activity treatment with response, toxicity and survival. | Lutetium-177 vipivotide tetraxetan, Lutetium-177 dotatate, VISION, SPECT & bone scan, A university cyclotron network with sh… | VISION, NEJM 2021 | ||
Which targets can T-cell engagers hit in solid tumours without on-target toxicity in normal tissue? Technology: T-cell engagers (bispecific) Tarlatamab (DLL3) and tebentafusp (gp100) proved the principle; most solid-tumour antigens are shared with normal tissue and the therapeutic window depends on affinity tuning and masking. | T-cell engagers (bispecific) | Randomised data for engagers against further solid-tumour antigens (STEAP1, PRAME, B7-H3) and masked or logic-gated formats. | Tarlatamab, Tebentafusp, Xaluritamig, Brenetafusp, XALute, PRISM-MEL-301 | DeLLphi-301, NEJM 2023 | ||
Can actinium-225 supply scale to treat tens of thousands of patients a year if the phase 3 trials succeed? Technology: Targeted alpha therapy Actinium-225 comes from a handful of thorium-229 generators and accelerator routes with radionuclidic impurities; current output is a small fraction of projected demand. | Targeted alpha therapy | Committed production capacity with regulatory-grade specifications matching the enrolment and label projections of AlphaBreak-type trials. | Actinium-225 PSMA agents, AlphaBreak (FPI-2265) & AcTION (225Ac-…, Therapeutic isotope supply chain (Mo-9…, A global medical isotope supply observ…, A coordinated reserve and shared sched… | AlphaBreak (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Does TIL therapy work outside melanoma, and can selection for neoantigen-reactive T cells raise response rates? Technology: TIL therapy Lifileucel is approved for melanoma after PD-1 failure; responses in lung and cervical cancer are lower, and most infused cells are not tumour-reactive. | TIL therapy | Randomised trials in non-melanoma cancers and comparisons of selected versus bulk TIL products. | Lifileucel, C-144-01, PD-1 failure → TIL therapy, Grow tumour organoids together with th… | C-144-01 (ClinicalTrials.gov) | ||
Can mutant p53 be drugged directly, whether by reactivation (Y220C binders), degradation, or synthetic lethality with WEE1 or ATR? Target: TP53 TP53 is the most mutated cancer gene and still has no approved drug; eprenetapopt failed, Y220C reactivators are in trials, and WEE1 and ATR inhibitors have shown activity mainly in small studies. | TP53 | A randomised trial with a TP53-allele-selected population meeting its primary endpoint, or a mechanistic demonstration of mutant-p53 degradation with clinical response. | Eprenetapopt, WEE1, ATR, Degrade the damaged p53 protein rather…, Extend p53 reactivation beyond the Y22…, A synthetic lethality map for every ca… | Vogelstein et al., Science 2013 | ||
Is there any biomarker (IHC, PET, quantitative continuous scoring) that predicts who benefits from a TROP2 ADC? Target: TROP2 TROP2 ADCs are given without testing because IHC did not separate responders in ASCENT or TROPION-Breast01; TROPION-Lung01 reported a computational membrane-ratio score retrospectively but it is unvalidated. | TROP2 | Prospective validation of a quantitative TROP2 score or a TROP2 PET tracer against progression-free survival in a randomised ADC trial. | Sacituzumab govitecan, Datopotamab deruxtecan, ASCENT, TROPION-Breast01, TROP2 PET, TROP2 PET to choose and sequence TROP2… | ASCENT, NEJM 2021 |
Framing sources are papers or registry records, not proof that the question is unanswered everywhere; if you know a trial or paper that settles one, suggest an edit. Questions appear on the target dossiers. Stage and actor use the same vocabulary as ideas, so a funder can filter both by who has to move.