Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive but curable lymphoma. CAR-T cures about 40% of relapsed patients, and off-the-shelf bispecifics are now approved.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most common aggressive lymphoma, about 30% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with a median age around 65. It is curable: R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) cures roughly 60% of patients, more with low IPI and fewer with high-risk features (IPI 3-5, double-hit MYC/BCL2 rearrangement, activated B-cell origin, TP53 loss). Staging uses PET-CT and the Lugano classification; biology is read from cell of origin and FISH for MYC, BCL2 and BCL6, with genetic classifiers (LymphGen) and ctDNA emerging.
Frontline therapy stood still for twenty years until POLARIX (2022) showed that replacing vincristine with the CD79b ADC polatuzumab vedotin improves progression-free survival (5-year 64.9% vs 59.1%), and frontMIND (Lancet 2026) showed tafasitamab plus lenalidomide added to R-CHOP improves PFS in IPI 3-5 disease (HR 0.75); epcoritamab plus R-CHOP (EPCORE DLBCL-2) and golcadomide plus R-CHOP (GOLSEEK-1) follow. For the 30-40% who relapse, the sequence has been rebuilt around T-cell redirection: CD19 CAR-T (axi-cel, liso-cel) beats salvage chemotherapy and transplant for relapse within a year (ZUMA-7 with an overall survival benefit; TRANSFORM), while transplant remains for later chemosensitive relapse. Off-the-shelf CD20×CD3 bispecifics (glofitamab, epcoritamab, mosunetuzumab, odronextamab) give complete remissions in about 40% of heavily pretreated patients, and chemotherapy-free doublets such as mosunetuzumab-polatuzumab (SUNMO) beat salvage chemotherapy. CD19 ADC (loncastuximab), tafasitamab-lenalidomide, and the ROR1 ADC zilovertamab vedotin fill later lines.
The open questions are regulatory as much as scientific. EPCORE DLBCL-1 (2026) improved PFS but not overall survival against chemotherapy; STARGLO's survival benefit was rejected by the FDA because the trial was mostly enrolled in Asia. Nobody has compared bispecifics with CAR-T head to head. ctDNA (PhasED-seq) predicts cure better than PET and is the obvious tool for response-adapted frontline therapy. Primary refractory disease, CNS relapse, older and frail patients, and access to CAR-T outside major centres remain the hard problems.
State of the art today
- CAR-T second line.
- Bispecifics as off-the-shelf T-cell therapy.
- Frontline has moved: Pola-R-CHP (POLARIX) is standard for IPI 2-5, and frontMIND (tafasitamab-lenalidomide-R-CHOP) is the first phase 3 to beat R-CHOP in IPI 3-5 disease since rituximab.
- Four CD20×CD3 bispecifics approved or conditionally approved worldwide give ~40% complete remissions off the shelf; chemotherapy-free doublets (mosun-pola) beat salvage chemotherapy.
- ctDNA by phased-variant sequencing detects residual lymphoma below PET sensitivity and is entering response-adapted trials.
Show survival figures (2)
Averages across everyone diagnosed, often years ago. Your stage, subtype, age, fitness and the treatment you receive matter more than the average, and the numbers are improving quickly.
- CD19 CAR-T is second-line standard for early relapse, with an overall survival benefit in ZUMA-7 (4-year OS 54.6% vs 46.0%).
- Regulators now scrutinise generalisability (STARGLO CRL) and demand overall survival for confirmatory bispecific trials (EPCORE DLBCL-1 missed OS).
~150,000 new cases a year worldwide; ~25,000 in the US; median age 65; about 60% cured with first-line therapy.
Where the cases are
Site: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (all subtypes) (shared total; subtype split not reported). World: 553,389 new cases, 250,679 deaths.
| # | Country | New cases | Deaths | Incidence ASR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | China | 80,829 | 39,700 | |
| 2 | United States of America | 77,956 | 20,827 | |
| 3 | India | 39,736 | 22,972 | |
| 4 | Japan | 36,179 | 15,408 | |
| 5 | Germany | 18,980 | 7,879 | |
| 6 | France (metropolitan) | 16,972 | 6,073 | |
| 7 | Indonesia | 16,175 | 9,440 | |
| 8 | United Kingdom | 16,047 | 5,671 | |
| 9 | Italy | 15,576 | 5,879 | |
| 10 | Russian Federation | 12,070 | 6,338 |
GLOBOCAN reports NHL as one site; DLBCL is roughly 30-40% of cases.
CD20×CD3 bispecifics, loncastuximab, tafasitamab.
R-CHOP × 4 with PET-guided omission of radiation (FLYER, S1001): 4 cycles if interim PET negative; involved-site radiotherapy if PET positive.
R-CHOP × 6 (or Pola-R-CHP); consider 4 cycles plus 2 rituximab in young low-risk patients (FLYER).
Pola-R-CHP × 6 (POLARIX) or R-CHOP × 6; tafasitamab + lenalidomide + R-CHOP (frontMIND) pending approval for IPI 3-5; DA-EPOCH-R for double-hit lymphoma; CNS prophylaxis for high CNS-IPI (contested).
R-mini-CHOP; epcoritamab-based regimens in trials for the elderly (EPCORE NHL-2 cohorts); tafasitamab-lenalidomide where transplant is never an option.
CD19 CAR-T (axi-cel or liso-cel) preferred over salvage chemotherapy and transplant (ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM); bridging therapy while manufacturing; bispecific ± chemotherapy if CAR-T unavailable.
Salvage chemotherapy (R-ICE, R-DHAP, R-GemOx) → high-dose therapy and autologous transplant if chemosensitive; CAR-T if not.
CD20×CD3 bispecific (glofitamab, epcoritamab) or mosunetuzumab-polatuzumab (SUNMO); pola-BR; tafasitamab-lenalidomide; loncastuximab tesirine.
CAR-T if not yet given; bispecific after CAR-T (active in CD19-negative relapse if CD20 retained); loncastuximab; zilovertamab vedotin (trial); allogeneic transplant in selected fit patients; clinical trials.
Subtypes & biomarkers
top- Germinal-centre B-cell-like (GCB) vs activated B-cell-like (ABC / non-GCB)
- High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements (double hit)
- LymphGen genetic subtypes : MCD, BN2, N1, EZB, ST2, A53
- Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (distinct; PD-1 responsive)
- Primary CNS lymphoma (distinct; methotrexate-based)
- Transformed indolent lymphoma (Richter, transformed follicular)
- EBV-positive DLBCL of the elderly
- Primary refractory vs early relapse (<12 months) vs late relapse
- Cell of origin (GCB/ABC)
- Double-hit (MYC/BCL2)
- CD19/CD20
- ctDNA MRD
- IPI / NCCN-IPI
- Cell of origin (Hans IHC, Lymph2Cx)
- MYC, BCL2, BCL6 FISH
- TP53 mutation
- CD19 and CD20 expression (loss after CAR-T or bispecific)
- Interim and end-of-treatment PET (Deauville)
- ctDNA (PhasED-seq, clonoSEQ)
- LDH
- CNS-IPI for CNS prophylaxis decisions
Target prevalence in this cancer
| Target / alteration | Prevalence | Measure | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| CD19 Loss in ~30% of CAR-T relapses | >95% | Surface expression | Wikipedia |
| CD20 | >95% | Surface expression | Wikipedia |
| CD79b | 95% | surface expression | doi.org |
| CD47 | >90% | Surface expression | Wikipedia |
| ROR1 | 30-50% | IHC, any expression | Wikipedia |
| BCL-2 ~90% in follicular lymphoma t(14;18) | 30-40% | BCL2 translocation/overexpression | Wikipedia |
| EZH2 Tazemetostat withdrawn March 2026 | 20-25% | EZH2 Y641 mutation in follicular/GCB lymphoma | Wikipedia |
How common each drug target or alteration is in this cancer. Population-level and approximate; see the target page for detail. Full matrix.
- 1976CHOP regimen introduced
Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone becomes the backbone for aggressive lymphoma.
- 1993CHOP proves equal to more intensive regimens; IPI published
- 1997Rituximab: first antibody for cancer
- 1997Rituximab: first monoclonal antibody approved for cancer
- 2000Gene-expression profiling defines GCB and ABC subtypes
- 2002GELA LNH-98.5: R-CHOP improves survival over CHOP
Rituximab added to CHOP raises cure rates by ~15 points; the standard for the next twenty years.
- 2014Lugano classification unifies PET-based staging and response
- 2017Axi-cel CAR-T approved
- 2017Axi-cel: first CAR-T approved for large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1)
- 2019Polatuzumab vedotin approved with BR for relapsed disease
- 2020Tafasitamab-lenalidomide (L-MIND) approved for transplant-ineligible relapse
- 2021Loncastuximab tesirine approved; BELINDA fails while ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM succeed
- 2022ZUMA-7: CAR-T beats transplant
- 2022POLARIX: first frontline improvement on R-CHOP in twenty years; CAR-T approved second line
- 2023Glofitamab, epcoritamab approved
- 2023Glofitamab and epcoritamab approved: off-the-shelf T-cell redirection
- 2024STARGLO shows OS benefit for glofitamab-GemOx; odronextamab approved in EU
- 2025SUNMO positive (mosun-pola); FDA rejects STARGLO indication over applicability; POLARIX 5-year data
- 2026frontMIND published in Lancet; EPCORE DLBCL-1 misses OS; frontline bispecific data (EPCORE DLBCL-2) at EHA
Open problems
- Primary refractory disease.
- CAR-T access and cost.
- Primary refractory disease (~10-15%) still has poor outcomes even with CAR-T; CD19-negative and CD20-negative escape after targeted therapy.
- No head-to-head comparison of bispecifics and CAR-T; sequencing is by access rather than evidence.
- Overall survival is hard to demonstrate for bispecifics against chemotherapy with crossover and effective later lines (EPCORE DLBCL-1).
- Trial generalisability: STARGLO's rejection shows regional enrolment can decide approvals.
- CNS relapse: prophylaxis with high-dose methotrexate is of uncertain benefit and CNS-penetrant options are few.
- Older and frail patients are underrepresented; R-mini-CHOP cure rates lag and cellular therapies carry toxicity.
- Cost and access: CAR-T requires certified centres; bispecific CRS management needs infrastructure; lenalidomide-based triplets add expense.
- Response-adapted therapy: interim PET is unreliable and ctDNA is not yet a regulatory endpoint.
Trials
topRecruiting now (live from ClinicalTrials.gov)
Country and place are remembered in this browser only. A postcode is sent to OpenStreetMap's Nominatim service to find coordinates when you press the button; nothing else leaves your device.
Landmark trials in OnCo
Expert centres
topCentres linked to this cancer in OnCo
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer
- via this cancer
- via this cancer
- via this cancer
- via this cancer
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- LYSA – The Lymphoma Study AssociationPierre-Bénite (Lyon), FRvia this cancer, Axicabtagene ciloleucel, Glofitamab, FDG PET +3
- International Extranodal Lymphoma Study GroupBellinzona, CHvia this cancer, FDG PET, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), Monoclonal antibodies
- via this cancer, Glofitamab, CAR-T cell therapy, CD20
- via this cancer, FDG PET, CD20, Monoclonal antibodies
- Geneva University Hospitals (HUG)Geneva, CHvia this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), CAR-T cell therapy
- German Lymphoma AllianceHomburg, DEvia this cancer, Cytotoxic chemotherapy, Monoclonal antibodies
- Nordic Lymphoma GroupStockholm, SEvia this cancer, Cytotoxic chemotherapy, Monoclonal antibodies
- Rigshospitalet – Copenhagen University HospitalCopenhagen, DKvia this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), CAR-T cell therapy
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT)Frankfurt am Main, DEvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy, Monoclonal antibodies
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- American Society of HematologyWashington, DC, USvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- Butaro Cancer Center of ExcellenceButaro, RWvia this cancer, Cytotoxic chemotherapy
- Central Drugs Standard Control OrganizationNew Delhi, INvia CAR-T cell therapy, Monoclonal antibodies
- via this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijing, CNvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- Cleveland Clinic Abu DhabiAbu Dhabi, AEvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- European Hematology AssociationThe Hague, NLvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- German Hodgkin Study GroupCologne, DEvia FDG PET, Cytotoxic chemotherapy
- Hadassah Medical CenterJerusalem, ILvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Henan Cancer HospitalZhengzhou, CNvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via CAR-T cell therapy, Monoclonal antibodies
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- Institut Jules BordetBrussels, BEvia this cancer, Monoclonal antibodies
- IRCCS Humanitas Research HospitalRozzano (Milan), ITvia this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), CAR-T cell therapy
- Juravinski Cancer Centre / Escarpment Cancer Research InstituteHamilton, ON, CAvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), CAR-T cell therapy
- Kenyatta National HospitalNairobi, KEvia this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- NCI Center for Cancer Research (intramural programme)Bethesda, MD, USvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- Peking University Cancer HospitalBeijing, CNvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research CentreNew Delhi, INvia this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghai, CNvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- Seoul St. Mary's HospitalSeoul, KRvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- Sheba Medical CenterRamat Gan, ILvia this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol UniversityBangkok, THvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), CAR-T cell therapy
- Tata Medical Center, KolkataKolkata, INvia this cancer, IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via Zilovertamab vedotin, Monoclonal antibodies
- Uganda Cancer InstituteKampala, UGvia this cancer, Cytotoxic chemotherapy
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer, CAR-T cell therapy
- via CAR-T cell therapy, Cytotoxic chemotherapy
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam), Cytotoxic chemotherapy
- Aarhus University HospitalAarhus, DKvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- Advanced Research Projects Agency for HealthWashington, DC, USvia CAR-T cell therapy
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New DelhiNew Delhi, INvia CAR-T cell therapy
- American Society for Radiation OncologyArlington, VA, USvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via Cytotoxic chemotherapy
- BC CancerVancouver, BC, CAvia this cancer
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- Centre Antoine LacassagneNice, FRvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Centre Oscar LambretLille, FRvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Chan Zuckerberg BiohubSan Francisco, USvia CAR-T cell therapy
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia, PA, USvia CAR-T cell therapy
- Christian Medical College, VelloreVellore, INvia CAR-T cell therapy
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- City of Hope Orange CountyIrvine, CA, USvia CAR-T cell therapy
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg (CCCF)Freiburg im Breisgau, DEvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of MedicineHouston, TX, USNCI comprehensivevia CAR-T cell therapy
- via Monoclonal antibodies
- European Medicines AgencyAmsterdam, NLvia CAR-T cell therapy
- European Society for Radiotherapy and OncologyBrussels, BEvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via this cancer
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- GEICAM Spanish Breast Cancer GroupMadrid, ESvia Cytotoxic chemotherapy
- via Monoclonal antibodies
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- Groote Schuur Hospital / University of Cape TownCape Town, ZAvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Hacettepe University Cancer InstituteAnkara, TRvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via this cancer
- Ho Chi Minh City Oncology HospitalHo Chi Minh City, VNvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Hokkaido University HospitalSapporo, JPvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona / IDIBAPSBarcelona, ESvia CAR-T cell therapy
- Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubreMadrid, ESvia CAR-T cell therapy
- HOVONRotterdam, NLvia this cancer
- Hunan Cancer HospitalChangsha, CNvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer CenterIndianapolis, IN, USNCI comprehensivevia Cytotoxic chemotherapy
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- Institut BergoniéBordeaux, FRvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Institut National d'Oncologie, RabatRabat, MAvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Institut Paoli-CalmettesMarseille, FRvia CAR-T cell therapy
- Institut Salah AzaïezTunis, TNvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Institute of Oncology LjubljanaLjubljana, SIvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (Mexico)Mexico City, MXvia this cancer
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- IRCCS Ospedale San RaffaeleMilan, ITvia CAR-T cell therapy
- Istanbul University Institute of OncologyIstanbul, TRvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Istituto di Candiolo IRCCS – FPOCandiolo, ITvia Monoclonal antibodies
- Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCSPadua, ITvia Monoclonal antibodies
- Keio University HospitalTokyo, JPvia this cancer
- King Hussein Cancer CenterAmman, JOvia this cancer
- Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer CenterTaipei, TWvia this cancer
- Korle Bu Teaching HospitalAccra, GHvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Kyushu University HospitalFukuoka, JPvia this cancer
- Lagos University Teaching HospitalLagos, NGvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via this cancer
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- National Cancer Centre SingaporeSingapore, SGvia CAR-T cell therapy
- National Institute of Oncology, HungaryBudapest, HUvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- Nationwide Children's HospitalColumbus, OH, USvia CAR-T cell therapy
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Northwell Health Cancer InstituteNew Hyde Park, NY, USvia CAR-T cell therapy
- Ocean Road Cancer InstituteDar es Salaam, TZvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- Rambam Health Care CampusHaifa, ILvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Royal Adelaide HospitalAdelaide, AUvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- via Monoclonal antibodies
- Society for Immunotherapy of CancerMilwaukee, WI, USvia CAR-T cell therapy
- Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular ImagingReston, VA, USvia FDG PET
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- Taipei Veterans General HospitalTaipei, TWvia CAR-T cell therapy
- Tawam HospitalAl Ain, AEvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel Aviv, ILvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology CenterHouston, TX, USvia CAR-T cell therapy
- via Monoclonal antibodies
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- TROG Cancer ResearchNewcastle, NSW, AUvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- UMC Utrecht Cancer CenterUtrecht, NLvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- via CAR-T cell therapy
- via this cancer
- University of Malaya Medical CentreKuala Lumpur, MYvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- UZ Leuven / Leuven Cancer InstituteLeuven, BEvia Monoclonal antibodies
- Velindre Cancer CentreCardiff, GBvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- via IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
- Weizmann Institute of ScienceRehovot, ILvia Monoclonal antibodies
- via this cancer
- Zhejiang Cancer HospitalHangzhou, CNvia IMRT / IGRT (modern external beam)
Questions to ask
topQuestions to ask your oncologist about Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Newly diagnosed
- What is my exact diagnosis, stage, and grade, and which tests established them?Why: Everything else follows from an accurate stage and subtype.
- Which biomarkers have been tested on my tumour (for example Cell of origin, Double-hit, CD19/CD20, ctDNA MRD, IPI / NCCN-IPI), and what were the results?Why: These results decide eligibility for targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and trials.
- Which subtype is my cancer, and does that change the recommended treatment?Why: Recognised subtypes for this cancer include Germinal-centre B-cell-likevs activated B-cell-like, High-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC and BCL2 rearrangements, LymphGen genetic subtypes: MCD, BN2, N1, EZB, ST2, A53.
- Is germline (inherited) genetic testing recommended for me or my family?Why: Inherited variants can change treatment and matter for relatives.
Frontline
- For my situation (frontline), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: R-CHOP or Pola-R-CHP.
Early relapse
- For my situation (early relapse), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: CD19 CAR-T.
- Am I a candidate for Axicabtagene ciloleucel, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
Later
- For my situation (later), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: CD20×CD3 bispecifics, loncastuximab, tafasitamab.
- Am I a candidate for Glofitamab, Loncastuximab tesirine, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
Limited stage (I-II, non-bulky)
- For my situation (limited stage (i-ii, non-bulky)), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: R-CHOP × 4 with PET-guided omission of radiation (FLYER, S1001): 4 cycles if interim PET negative; involved-site radiotherapy if PET positive.
- Am I a candidate for Doxorubicin, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
Advanced stage, IPI 0-1
- For my situation (advanced stage, ipi 0-1), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: R-CHOP × 6 (or Pola-R-CHP); consider 4 cycles plus 2 rituximab in young low-risk patients (FLYER).
- Am I a candidate for Doxorubicin, Polatuzumab vedotin, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
Advanced stage, IPI 2-5
- For my situation (advanced stage, ipi 2-5), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: Pola-R-CHP × 6 (POLARIX) or R-CHOP × 6; tafasitamab + lenalidomide + R-CHOP (frontMIND) pending approval for IPI 3-5; DA-EPOCH-R for double-hit lymphoma; CNS prophylaxis for high CNS-IPI (contested).
- Am I a candidate for Polatuzumab vedotin, Tafasitamab, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
- How do the results of POLARIX and frontMIND apply to someone like me?Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.
Frail or elderly
- For my situation (frail or elderly), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: R-mini-CHOP; epcoritamab-based regimens in trials for the elderly (EPCORE NHL-2 cohorts); tafasitamab-lenalidomide where transplant is never an option.
- Am I a candidate for Epcoritamab, Tafasitamab, Lenalidomide, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
Primary refractory or relapse within 12 months
- For my situation (primary refractory or relapse within 12 months), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: CD19 CAR-T (axi-cel or liso-cel) preferred over salvage chemotherapy and transplant (ZUMA-7, TRANSFORM); bridging therapy while manufacturing; bispecific ± chemotherapy if CAR-T unavailable.
- Am I a candidate for Axicabtagene ciloleucel, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
- How do the results of ZUMA-7 and TRANSFORM apply to someone like me?Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.
Late relapse (>12 months), transplant-eligible
- For my situation (late relapse (>12 months), transplant-eligible), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: Salvage chemotherapy (R-ICE, R-DHAP, R-GemOx) → high-dose therapy and autologous transplant if chemosensitive; CAR-T if not.
Relapse, transplant-ineligible
- For my situation (relapse, transplant-ineligible), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: CD20×CD3 bispecific (glofitamab, epcoritamab) or mosunetuzumab-polatuzumab (SUNMO); pola-BR; tafasitamab-lenalidomide; loncastuximab tesirine.
- Am I a candidate for Glofitamab, Epcoritamab, Mosunetuzumab or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
- How do the results of SUNMO apply to someone like me?Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.
Third line and beyond
- For my situation (third line and beyond), which of the standard options do you recommend and why?Why: Guideline options include: CAR-T if not yet given; bispecific after CAR-T (active in CD19-negative relapse if CD20 retained); loncastuximab; zilovertamab vedotin (trial); allogeneic transplant in selected fit patients; clinical trials.
- Am I a candidate for Axicabtagene ciloleucel, Glofitamab, Epcoritamab or related drugs, and what side effects should I expect?Why: Knowing the expected toxicities helps you plan work, family, and supportive care.
- How do the results of waveLINE-003 apply to someone like me?Why: Trial populations differ from individual patients; ask how closely you match.
Any stage
- Are there clinical trials I could join, for example of Zilovertamab vedotin, frontMIND, Tafasitamab, EPCORE DLBCL-2?Why: Trials are how the next standard of care is set; asking early keeps options open.
- Would a second opinion at a high-volume centre change anything, and can you help arrange it?Why: Rare or high-stakes decisions benefit from a centre that treats many similar patients.
- What supportive care (symptom control, nutrition, exercise, mental health, financial help) is available from the start?Why: Supportive care improves quality of life and helps patients complete treatment.
- I read that “Primary refractory disease”. How does that affect my plan?Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.
- I read that “CAR-T access and cost”. How does that affect my plan?Why: Open problems are where trials and second opinions matter most.
Print this page for your appointment (your browser's print command). These prompts are for discussion; your clinical team knows your case.
Direct links plus the targets, companies, and technologies of this cancer's products.
technologies
17targets
13drugs
27companies
26institutions
61pathways
2terms
11trials
14pairings
3ideas
18collections
2people
15bottlenecks
3key papers
6CD20 x CD3 bispecifics gave patients whose lymphoma has failed CAR-T, or who cannot access it, an effective off-the-shelf treatment that can be started within days. Epcoritamab and glofitamab are now standard third-line options and are moving into earlier lines and combinations. They do not yet replace CAR-T, whose remissions appear more durable.
POLARIX gave the first new first-line standard for DLBCL since rituximab was added to CHOP, and pola-R-CHP is now approved and widely used, especially in higher-risk or ABC-type disease. The gain is modest and survival is unchanged, so many clinicians still use R-CHOP in lower-risk or GCB-type patients. Cost and subgroup uncertainty drive ongoing debate.
TRANSFORM confirmed ZUMA-7's conclusion with a different CD19 CAR-T and a more permissive design that allowed bridging chemotherapy, making the results closer to real-world practice. Liso-cel's low toxicity makes it attractive for older or frailer patients and for outpatient delivery. Together the two trials made CAR-T the standard second-line therapy for early-relapsing aggressive lymphoma.
ZUMA-7 rewrote second-line treatment for aggressive lymphoma: patients whose disease returns within a year of R-CHOP should be offered CAR-T rather than salvage chemotherapy and transplant. It is also one of the few cell-therapy trials to show an overall survival benefit despite crossover. Patients relapsing later than 12 months were not studied and transplant remains standard for them if chemosensitive.
JULIET, with ZUMA-1, showed that CAR-T could rescue a substantial minority of adults with chemotherapy-refractory lymphoma and that complete responders often stay in remission. The lower toxicity of a 4-1BB construct and the option of bridging therapy made it usable in a broader population. The high drop-out between enrolment and infusion remains a lesson about turnaround time.
ZUMA-1 showed that CAR-T can cure a meaningful fraction of adults whose aggressive lymphoma no longer responds to chemotherapy, a group with a historical median survival of about six months (SCHOLAR-1). Axi-cel became the first CAR-T approved for lymphoma and later the first to beat standard second-line therapy in ZUMA-7. The comparatively high neurotoxicity of CD28-costimulated products was also first characterised here.
Latest papers
topQuery for this cancer: (TITLE:"Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma" OR ABSTRACT:"Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma") AND (treatment OR therapy OR trial OR survival OR diagnosis). Results are unfiltered search hits about Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not a curated reading list.